Bullshit that happened

[Tgo01]

A new thread for all of the bullshit happening in this country thanks to the far left.

First there was Jazmine Barnes' murder that somehow initially pinned the blame on a racist MAGA hat wearing white man then it turned out it was two black men, then the whole Covington MAGA hat wearing teens fiasco that the media got 100% wrong, now this (https://reason.com/blog/2019/01/29/chicago-police-deny-claim-that-jussie-sm).

Jussie Smollett was supposedly attacked and beaten by two men shouting racist and homophobic slurs at him. Initially the news said it was two white men who told him "This is MAGA country" (in Chicago of all places.) The police said that's wrong because the victim said the men were wearing masks and gloves so the victim has no way of knowing if they were white, they also said the victim said nothing about the men shouting MAGA country. So the police asked him about it the next day and wouldn't you know it? He suddenly remembers that yes, yes in fact they DID shout "This is MAGA country." I'm sure what's coming next is they weren't really wearing masks and he could indeed tell they were white.

Oh and some other interesting aspects of this story, Jussie Smollett just so happens to hate Trump with every fiber of his being and has referred to anyone who supports Trump as a "white hooded clown." The police have also so far reviewed dozens of surveillance video in the area and the only one they have found so far that shows Smollett in it shows him all alone. They also haven't found any video that shows two men in the area wearing masks nor any vehicles in the area of the attack. Imagine that.

Also the initial news reporting says the attackers had a rope tied like a noose and wrapped it around his neck, the police have said it was a clothesline that didn't resemble a noose at all.

Smollett wasn't even the ones who called the cops, he went to a friend's place after the attack and the friend called the police, which was about an hour after the attack. Smollett refused medial attention by police and later took himself to the hospital.

And remember this took place in Chicago of all places, one of the most diverse and left leaning cities in the entire world. I'm guessing one of two things happened: this was just a robbery or the guy is making the entire thing up.

And let me say you the trouble Androidpk and sellstuff1; you're gonna call me a racist and a bigot and an asshole and a MAGAhead. Got it.

[Androidpk]

Cool story, bro.

[Tgo01]

Cool story, bro.

It's actually a terrible story of a gay black man possibly being the victim of a mugging or a hate crime. Why do you hate gays and blacks so much? Oh, right, you're on the far left, that goes without saying.

[Androidpk]

It's actually a terrible story of a gay black man possibly being the victim of a mugging or a hate crime. Why do you hate gays and blacks so much? Oh, right, you're on the far left, that goes without saying.

Cool story, bro.

[Methais]

Cool story, bro.

Don't you have some dildos to stress test?

[Parkbandit]

Don't you have some dildos to stress test?

LOL.

[Alfster]

You want to talk bullshit happening in this country - just follow Trump on Twitter. Pure bullshit.

The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, but...

..a source of potential danger and conflict. They are testing Rockets (last week) and more, and are coming very close to the edge. There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!

This senile douche believes 1) he is intelligent and 2) he somehow knows more about foreign policy than people who have made a career of it.

L

[Androidpk]

You want to talk bullshit happening in this country - just follow Trump on Twitter. Pure bullshit.

The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, but...

..a source of potential danger and conflict. They are testing Rockets (last week) and more, and are coming very close to the edge. There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!

This senile douche believes 1) he is intelligent and 2) he somehow knows more about foreign policy than people who have made a career of it.

L

Trump is such a moron they had to dumb down the PDB to just a few bullet points and even then he doesn't listen to it. This is right up there with him saying he knows more than the generals in the military about how ISIS operates.

[Wrathbringer]

I'm such a moron.

Yep.

[Tgo01]

You want to talk bullshit happening in this country - just follow Trump on Twitter. Pure bullshit.

The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, but...

..a source of potential danger and conflict. They are testing Rockets (last week) and more, and are coming very close to the edge. There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!

This senile douche believes 1) he is intelligent and 2) he somehow knows more about foreign policy than people who have made a career of it.

L

Can't possibly imagine why I thought you were a leftist.

[Alfster]

So you'd side with the president over the intelligence community? Knowing that our intelligence community uses facts? If Trump does have facts - who is feeding them to him?

Disliking Trump for being incompetent doesn't make someone a leftist.

[Tgo01]

So you'd side with the president over the intelligence community? Knowing that our intelligence community uses facts? If Trump does have facts - who is feeding them to him?

Side with him over what? The dangers of Iran? I don't even know who or what in particular he is arguing against but yes, yes I would say Iran is dangerous. They are in fact arming and supporting terrorists in the region, developing nuclear missiles, oh wait sorry, "nuclear energy", and letting their own people suffer and murdering people who dare speak up against the regime.


Disliking Trump for being incompetent doesn't make someone a leftist.

No, your constant whining about every little thing Trump does points to you being a leftist, to the point you defend Bernie Sanders saying Trump is a pathological liar and a racist.

If you think Trump is so incompetent why did you supposedly vote for him? There were other options besides Trump and Hillary.

[Androidpk]

Tgo finally admits he labels everyone that criticizes Trump, including Republicans, as far leftists.

[Alfster]

Side with him over what? The dangers of Iran? I don't even know who or what in particular he is arguing against but yes, yes I would say Iran is dangerous. They are in fact arming and supporting terrorists in the region, developing nuclear missiles, oh wait sorry, "nuclear energy", and letting their own people suffer and murdering people who dare speak up against the regime.



No, your constant whining about every little thing Trump does points to you being a leftist, to the point you defend Bernie Sanders saying Trump is a pathological liar and a racist.

If you think Trump is so incompetent why did you supposedly vote for him? There were other options besides Trump and Hillary.

Let me help you then. He's openly contradicting his own intelligence community. Yesterday his top intelligence official gave his official report that contradicts the president. How does trump handle it? Calling him out on Twitter.

In said report - there is no evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons - which it appears you also disagree with. The report also states that North Korea is unlikely to do anything to get rid of their nuclear weapons and that ISIS is not defeated.

Trump lies about everything. Like I said before - he even lied about how many hamburgers he bought for a celebration at the White House.

[Tgo01]

In said report - there is no evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons - which it appears you also disagree with. The report also states that North Korea is unlikely to do anything to get rid of their nuclear weapons and that ISIS is not defeated.

Like no evidence that right at this particular moment in time, or like in general they never want to develop nuclear weapons? Because wasn't the entire point of the nuclear agreement to make sure Iran doesn't get nuclear weapons for at least another 10 years back when it was signed? Are we saying Obama and the entire EU were wrong at the time or what?


Trump lies about everything. Like I said before - he even lied about how many hamburgers he bought for a celebration at the White House.

This is what I mean about you whining about everything Trump says. You're really complaining about an obvious hyperbole? I suppose you're also angry because he said the hamburgers were stacked a mile high when in reality they were only stacked a couple of feet high?

[Alfster]

Like no evidence that right at this particular moment in time, or like in general they never want to develop nuclear weapons? Because wasn't the entire point of the nuclear agreement to make sure Iran doesn't get nuclear weapons for at least another 10 years back when it was signed? Are we saying Obama and the entire EU were wrong at the time or what?



This is what I mean about you whining about everything Trump says. You're really complaining about an obvious hyperbole? I suppose you're also angry because he said the hamburgers were stacked a mile high when in reality they were only stacked a couple of feet high?

During the hearing, Coats said Iran isn't taking any steps to make a nuclear weapon. “We do not believe Iran is currently undertaking the key activities we judge necessary to produce a nuclear device," he said.

CIA Director Gina Haspel, who also spoke at the hearing, said Tehran, "at the moment, technically they're in compliance" with the deal.

But Coats also noted that Iranian officials have “publicly threatened to push the boundaries” of the nuclear deal if it did not see any benefits from it. He also alleged that Iran has sponsored terrorism in both Europe and the Middle East, while also backing proxy militias such as the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite armed groups in Iraq.

As far as the burgers go - it's not hyperbole. He inflates numbers when they help his cause. He straight up lied in order to make his feast more extravagent.

[Tgo01]

During the hearing, Coats said Iran isn't taking any steps to make a nuclear weapon. “We do not believe Iran is currently undertaking the key activities we judge necessary to produce a nuclear device," he said.

Keyword "currently." That's because they are still trying to salvage the nuclear deal with the EU.


But Coats also noted that Iranian officials have “publicly threatened to push the boundaries” of the nuclear deal if it did not see any benefits from it. He also alleged that Iran has sponsored terrorism in both Europe and the Middle East, while also backing proxy militias such as the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite armed groups in Iraq.

Hey look it's exactly what I said.


As far as the burgers go - it's not hyperbole. He inflates numbers when they help his cause. He straight up lied in order to make his feast more extravagent.

So you think he was also trying to pull the wool over our eyes by saying the burgers were stacked a mile high?

[Androidpk]

Keyword "currently." That's because they are still trying to salvage the nuclear deal with the EU.



Hey look it's exactly what I said.



So you think he was also trying to pull the wool over our eyes by saying the burgers were stacked a mile high?

Do you think Trump knows more than the CIA, NSA, ODNI?

[Alfster]

Yes currently they are adhering, and Trump is complaining on Twitter that they don't know what they are talking about. He was given that full briefing and decided to publicly complain about their intelligence while backing it up with nothing.

As far as burgers being stacked a mile high - no reasonable person would believe he meant literally. However - a reasonable person would hear 500 hamburgers and assume he actually meant...500.

[Solkern]

Yes currently they are adhering, and Trump is complaining on Twitter that they don't know what they are talking about. He was given that full briefing and decided to publicly complain about their intelligence while backing it up with nothing.

As far as burgers being stacked a mile high - no reasonable person would believe he meant literally. However - a reasonable person would hear 500 hamburgers and assume he actually meant...500.

From what I’ve read, he doesn’t even read the briefings, that true?

[Androidpk]

From what I’ve read, he doesn’t even read the briefings, that true?

The stable genius doesn't need briefings when he lives in his own world and creates his own reality.

[Androidpk]

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/12/13/1818994/-U-S-Intelligence-is-frustrated-that-Trump-can-t-comprehend-even-dumbed-down-reports

[Solkern]

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/12/13/1818994/-U-S-Intelligence-is-frustrated-that-Trump-can-t-comprehend-even-dumbed-down-reports

That article seems extremely bias, just based on the first paragraph. So I stopped reading... prefer ariticles that are unbiased or not so blantently bias

[Tgo01]

That article seems extremely bias, just based on the first paragraph. So I stopped reading... prefer ariticles that are unbiased or not so blantently bias

Dailykos is about is biased as they come. Surprised Androidpk didn't link to a Shareblue article.

[Alfster]

From what I’ve read, he doesn’t even read the briefings, that true?

I've read that too - but I can't really find any sources other than obviously anti Trump sites

[Solkern]

I heard the economist is as unbiased as they come? Thoughts?

[Androidpk]

https://www.gq.com/story/donald-trump-daily-intel-briefings-are-dumb

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/which-is-scarier--that-trump-doesnt-read-his-daily-intel-briefing-or-that-jared-kushner-does/2018/02/11/faad67e4-0f30-11e8-9065-e55346f6de81_story.html

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-briefings-232479

[Androidpk]

Dailykos is about is biased as they come. Surprised Androidpk didn't link to a Shareblue article.

Do you think Trump knows more than the CIA, NSA, ODNI?

[Seran]

Comrade, you are not supposed to talk about the president's Russian handlers. It's a secret.

[Tgo01]

And here it goes right back to Russia.

Again.

[Androidpk]

Comrade, you are not supposed to talk about the president's Russian handlers. It's a secret.

World's worst kept secret.

[Androidpk]

And here it goes right back to Russia.

Again.

Tgo still won't bother to share his sources that show that the Trump/Russia conspiracy is a vast left wing hoax cooked up by Hillary Clinton supporters just because Hillary lost the election.

[Methais]

Comrade, you are not supposed to talk about the president's Russian handlers. It's a secret.

Your AIM icon makes me mourn.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/94ec8e77f201109a234ae494b82bb514/tenor.gif?itemid=4988274


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cui1YCbwNJM

[Tgo01]

It's looking more and more like Smollet made the whole thing up. A dozen police officers went through hundreds of hours of video and the best they could come up with is video of two people walking AWAY from the alleged scene of the attack 30 minutes before it allegedly happened.

This is the problem when the far left insists there is a hood wearing boogeyman behind every corner waiting to attack a defenseless black person; when that doesn't happen they have to make up attacks to keep the threat alive.

But I'm sure Androidpk will be along any minute now to tell us how the "rising right wing violence" of 50 deaths in 20 years is something we all need to worry about.

[Androidpk]

It's looking more and more like Smollet made the whole thing up. A dozen police officers went through hundreds of hours of video and the best they could come up with is video of two people walking AWAY from the alleged scene of the attack 30 minutes before it allegedly happened.

This is the problem when the far left insists there is a hood wearing boogeyman behind every corner waiting to attack a defenseless black person; when that doesn't happen they have to make up attacks to keep the threat alive.

But I'm sure Androidpk will be along any minute now to tell us how the "rising right wing violence" of 50 deaths in 20 years is something we all need to worry about.

So because it wasn't caught on camera it didn't happen? Why are you so fanatic about protecting violent white supremacists? And that 50 murders wasn't 20 years, it was 1 year. The violence isn't coming from south of the border, its coming from unhinged white males like you.

[sellstuff1]

It's looking more and more like Smollet made the whole thing up. A dozen police officers went through hundreds of hours of video and the best they could come up with is video of two people walking AWAY from the alleged scene of the attack 30 minutes before it allegedly happened.

This is the problem when the far left insists there is a hood wearing boogeyman behind every corner waiting to attack a defenseless black person; when that doesn't happen they have to make up attacks to keep the threat alive.

But I'm sure Androidpk will be along any minute now to tell us how the "rising right wing violence" of 50 deaths in 20 years is something we all need to worry about.

Nah I'll just link this WAPO article that proves that, you know, your favorite factually accurate source:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/in-the-united-states-right-wing-violence-is-on-the-rise/2018/11/25/61f7f24a-deb4-11e8-85df-7a6b4d25cfbb_story.html

[Methais]

I hate white people because time4fun told me if I don't then I'll have to find somewhere else to live.

This is correct.

[Androidpk]

"Donald Trump Calls Jussie Smollett Attack Horrible "

Will Tgo change his tune on this violent hate crime? Survey says no.

[Tgo01]

"Donald Trump Calls Jussie Smollett Attack Horrible "

Will Tgo change his tune on this violent hate crime? Survey says no.

Because Trump said the supposed attack was horrible means it happened now? Everyone hear that? Androidpk says if Trump says something that means it's true and it happened! What an interesting development.

[Androidpk]

Only one saying "supposed" is you. Pretty sad when even Trump has come to the realization and you haven't.

[Tgo01]

Only one saying "supposed" is you. Pretty sad when even Trump has come to the realization and you haven't.

The mayor of Chicago, you know that guy more far left than even Androidpk, referred to Smollett's description of the attack as an "alleged statement."

The mayor is already hedging his bets against taking the actor at his word. But since when does Androidpk worry about pesky facts?

[Androidpk]

The mayor of Chicago, you know that guy more far left than even Androidpk, referred to Smollett's description of the attack as an "alleged statement."

The mayor is already hedging his bets against taking the actor at his word. But since when does Androidpk worry about pesky facts?

You mean the same mayor that condemned the attack and said that kind of violence has no place in Chicago?

Tgo once again showing his true colors by defending violent hate crimes perpetrated by white supremacists. And you wonder why people call you racist..

[Methais]

You mean the same mayor that condemned the attack and said that kind of violence has no place in Chicago?

Tgo once again showing his true colors by defending violent hate crimes perpetrated by white supremacists. And you wonder why people call you racist..

Who else calls him racist besides you and the rest of the PC mental illness tard crew?

[Tgo01]

More news from the VA governor who is in favor of 4th trimester abortions: in his grad school year book he has a picture of him with someone in black face and another picture with someone dressed in a KKK robe. The Democrats are of course largely giving him a pass, and I almost gave him a pass too thinking this year book was from like 1960 or something, but it was fucking in 1984. That's way past "That's just how shit was back then."

Well I misunderstood this. The person in blackface and the KKK robed person was the same photo and one of them is apparently Northam, that makes this much worse than before thinking he was just standing next to these people. And in 1984!

[Astray]

More news from the VA governor who is in favor of 4th trimester abortions: in his grad school year book he has a picture of him with someone in black face and another picture with someone dressed in a KKK robe. The Democrats are of course largely giving him a pass, and I almost gave him a pass too thinking this year book was from like 1960 or something, but it was fucking in 1984. That's way past "That's just how shit was back then."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/nu_oq-ZjtZD9QpmTMyrNyuliE0c=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/2TA3RSRGMYI6TNNUDUMN7N5QQQ.jpg


“I am deeply sorry for the decision I made to appear as I did in this photo and for the hurt that decision caused then and now,” he said. “This behavior is not in keeping with who I am today and the values I have fought for throughout my career in the military, in medicine, and in public service. But I want to be clear, I understand how this decision shakes Virginians’ faith in that commitment.”

[Tgo01]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/nu_oq-ZjtZD9QpmTMyrNyuliE0c=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/2TA3RSRGMYI6TNNUDUMN7N5QQQ.jpg

Yeah at first I thought the black face guy and the KKK guy were in different photos and he was standing next to them, but nope, looking at the picture it's obvious one of them is him. I don't know which one being him would make it worse.

[Alfster]

That's something I agree with you on. They should be screaming for his resignation.

[Tgo01]

This video gets a lot more hilarious now having seen his yearbook photo:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqO4u0yrkjA

Yes, that's Northam literally refusing to shake a black man's hand. Holy hell in a hand basket.

[Tgo01]

So Northam is refusing to resign and says he will serve out his term.

Media when teen smiles at a Native American: OUTRAGEOUS! Burn their school to the ground with them in it!
Media when Democrat governor calls for fourth trimester abortions and either poses in blackface or wore a full KKK hood and robe: Well let's not jump to conclusions...

[Tgo01]

Word is police have seen video footage showing Jussie Smollett was still holding his Subway sandwich when he returned to his friend's apartment after being attacked.

Yes, this man was shoved around and attacked by two men, had a chemical substance thrown on him, had a noose wrapped around his neck, AND he fought back, and through all of that he held onto his Subway sandwich for dear life.

Maybe Subway will hire him to be their newest spokesperson. They can show him leaving a Subway restaurant holding a foot long, get attacked, fighting back and all of that and through it all he's holding his sandwich up high to make sure no harm comes to it, then the scene turns to black and white with a colorized Subway logo over it with a narrator saying "Subway sandwiches are so good, you'll let no harm come to them before they reach your mouth."

[Androidpk]

White knighting for people that commit violent hate crimes is such a good look.

[Fortybox]

White knighting for people that commit violent hate crimes is such a good look.

Racist.

[Methais]

Yeah at first I thought the black face guy and the KKK guy were in different photos and he was standing next to them, but nope, looking at the picture it's obvious one of them is him. I don't know which one being him would make it worse.

No need to worry, CNN is on the case.

https://i.imgur.com/B7z2zT6.jpg

[Tgo01]

No need to worry, CNN is on the case.

https://i.imgur.com/B7z2zT6.jpg

CNN is such a joke. Fox News wasn't even half this bad during Obama's first term in office and the left couldn't stop calling them fake news, but they seem to flock to CNN. Strange.

[Back]

So Northam is refusing to resign and says he will serve out his term.

Media when teen smiles at a Native American: OUTRAGEOUS! Burn their school to the ground with them in it!
Media when Democrat governor calls for fourth trimester abortions and either poses in blackface or wore a full KKK hood and robe: Well let's not jump to conclusions...

Welcome to the Tgo spin zone.

VA democrats are calling for his resignation. Hate to burst your angry little bubble.

[Androidpk]

CNN is such a joke. Fox News wasn't even half this bad during Obama's first term in office and the left couldn't stop calling them fake news, but they seem to flock to CNN. Strange.

CNN is such a joke yet the US military and national security agencies use it on a daily basis.. weird.

[Tgo01]

Welcome to the Tgo spin zone.

VA democrats are calling for his resignation. Hate to burst your angry little bubble.

I said media. Is resisting white supremacy affecting your ability to read? Also you'll notice there are some Democrats in VA who are still sticking up for him and the VA black caucus at first gave him a pass (around the time I made that post I might add) but have since called for him to resign.

Why do you hate facts so much, Back? Show us on this doll where the facts touched you.

[Back]

I said media. Is resisting white supremacy affecting your ability to read? Also you'll notice there are some Democrats in VA who are still sticking up for him and the VA black caucus at first gave him a pass (around the time I made that post I might add) but have since called for him to resign.

Why do you hate facts so much, Back? Show us on this doll where the facts touched you.

I was not aware anyone was sticking up for him. Thats a bad move on their part. We can agree on that.

Keep raging on though. Watch your blood pressure.

[Parkbandit]

I was not aware

A reoccurring theme in your life....

[Gelston]

CNN is such a joke yet the US military and national security agencies use it on a daily basis.. weird.

Rofl youre retardrd

[Back]

A reoccurring theme in your life....

:jerkit:

[Parkbandit]

:jerkit:

Another reoccurring theme in your life...

[Methais]

Another reoccurring theme in your life...

Fun fact: PK has never complained about hearing dudes masturbating

[Tgo01]

Since Back is such a dumbshit and thinks the media isn't giving Northam a pass, here you go:

Sorry, Republicans. You can’t call out Northam for racism and give Trump a pass. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/02/03/sorry-republicans-you-cant-call-out-northam-racism-give-trump-pass/?utm_term=.42f0a655ae2b)

[Back]

Since Back is such a dumbshit and thinks the media isn't giving Northam a pass, here you go:

Sorry, Republicans. You can’t call out Northam for racism and give Trump a pass. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/02/03/sorry-republicans-you-cant-call-out-northam-racism-give-trump-pass/?utm_term=.42f0a655ae2b)

Wut? You're really going to cite an opinion piece to bolster your bogus claim that the media is giving Northam a pass? Not only that, but the opinion piece agrees that Northrom should step down.

[Neveragain]

Wut? You're really going to cite an opinion piece to bolster your bogus claim that the media is giving Northam a pass? Not only that, but the opinion piece agrees that Northrom should step down.

Shouldn't he be "hunted down and locked away"?

[Tgo01]

Wut? You're really going to cite an opinion piece to bolster your bogus claim that the media is giving Northam a pass? Not only that, but the opinion piece agrees that Northrom should step down.

Opinion pieces no longer count as the media! You heard it straight from Back's fingertips!!

Sure they say Northram should resign, but they also say Republicans can't say anything about it until we demand Trump resign because of reasons. If that's not being the most disingenuous piece of shit they can possibly be then I don't know what is. Those teen's so called crimes were wearing a MAGA hat and smiling and the opinion pieces were much more harsh than "resign" and downplaying it by comparing their "crimes" to someone else's crimes. You're about as disingenuous as this opinion writer.

[Back]

Opinion pieces no longer count as the media! You heard it straight from Back's fingertips!!

Sure they say Northram should resign, but they also say Republicans can't say anything about it until we demand Trump resign because of reasons. If that's not being the most disingenuous piece of shit they can possibly be then I don't know what is. Those teen's so called crimes were wearing a MAGA hat and smiling and the opinion pieces were much more harsh than "resign" and downplaying it by comparing their "crimes" to someone else's crimes. You're about as disingenuous as this opinion writer.

Dude, the media is not giving Northram a pass. No matter how badly you wish that were true, its just not, and it does not take a brain surgeon to figure that out. Everyone agrees Northram needs to step down. And thats a good thing. Lets try to find things we agree on.

As for those kids, the Native Americans, and the black Israelites, a totally different subject in my opinion, I'm just glad that no one got hurt. If everyone was trying to diffuse the situation, like they said, then it worked.

[Tgo01]

Dude, the media is not giving Northram a pass. No matter how badly you wish that were true, its just not, and it does not take a brain surgeon to figure that out. Everyone agrees Northram needs to step down. And thats a good thing. Lets try to find things we agree on.

Media on teens: Punch those smug fuckers!
Media on Northam: Orange man bad! Also if you can like resign please Northam?

Oh yeah, these two things are certainly equal. Why you being so disingenuous?


As for those kids, the Native Americans, and the black Israelites, a totally different subject in my opinion, I'm just glad that no one got hurt. If everyone was trying to diffuse the situation, like they said, then it worked.

I agree, the teens did a great job diffusing the situation by remaining still and doing nothing. Too bad the media and far left cretins took them smiling and doing nothing as a racist attack.

[Androidpk]

Media on teens: Punch those smug fuckers!

This is some amazing hyperbole, even by tgo standards.

[Roiken]

I want to know what has to be done to get the Blow job this time... any Republican chicks that devoted to the cause?

[Tgo01]

"He is a deplorable. Some ppl can also be punched in the face." - Bakari Sellers in reference to this incident and showing a picture of the main teen in question in this tweet.

"So you see the story you see a video of a kid who has a Native American man who’s playing his drum, and these kids are around the guy and they’re all jeering and they’re dancing–he’s got the smug look on his face. And let’s not lie, everyone that sees that smug look wants to punch that kid, right?" - Trevor Noah

"Honest question. Have you ever seen a more punchable face than this kid’s?" - Reza Aslan

"I will blow whoever manages to punch that maga kid in the face" - Sarah Beattie

"MAGAkids go screaming, hats first, into the woodchipper." - Jack Morrissey

"LOCK THE KIDS IN THE SCHOOL AND BURN THAT BITCH TO THE GROUND" - Michael Buchanan

I wonder why Back and Androidpk hate facts so much? All we need now is for sellstuff1 to come along and say it's okay that people in the media said such harsh things about those teens because they deserved it, then Androidpk and sellstuff1 can suck each other off for a few posts over how brilliant the other one is.

[Androidpk]

Tgo gets called out for his idiocy, as per usual, so he jumps straight to homophobic insults. GG.

[Tgo01]

Look at this hot take from CNN regarding Northam:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/03/us/racist-photo-northam-blake-analysis/index.html

Analysis: The most shocking part of the racist yearbook photo is what critics leave out


But here's an uncomfortable truth that photo won't reveal:

Some of the biggest champions for black people in America's past have been white politicians who were racists.

Guys! Northam might be the best champion for blacks because the best politicians for blacks have historically been racist whites!

But naww! No one in the media is giving Northam a pass. Funny I can't find any articles from CNN saying "Sure everyone has decided that Trump is the biggest racist to ever serve because of...reasons...but that might be a good thing!"

[Methais]

Tgo gets called out for his idiocy, as per usual, so he jumps straight to homophobic insults. GG.

Quoted for when you do the same in probably like an hour.

[Tgo01]

The lawyer representing The Covington teen at the center of attention of Chief Bullshit's lies is suing about 50 people and put out this video that greatly explains the entire incident and shows Nathan Phillips for the lying sack of shit he is, shows the Black Hebrew Israelites for being the racist, sexist sacks of shit they are, and shows the teens did nothing wrong. Well nothing other than being white and wearing a MAGA hat of course, which is worse than rape to the far left.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSkpPaiUF8s

[Alfster]

The state of US politics: the other side is more racist than me!

[Parkbandit]

The state of US politics: the other side is more racist than me!

This is what happens when you use racist to describe someone who you disagree with politically...

[Androidpk]

Hodeidah, Yemen (CNN) – Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners have transferred American-made weapons to al Qaeda-linked fighters, hardline Salafi militias, and other factions waging war in Yemen, in violation of their agreements with the United States, a CNN investigation has found.


The weapons have also made their way into the hands of Iranian-backed rebels battling the coalition for control of the country, exposing some of America's sensitive military technology to Tehran and potentially endangering the lives of US troops in other conflict zones.


Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, its main partner in the war, have used the US-manufactured weapons as a form of currency to buy the loyalties of militias or tribes, bolster chosen armed actors, and influence the complex political landscape, according to local commanders on the ground and analysts who spoke to CNN.


By handing off this military equipment to third parties, the Saudi-led coalition is breaking the terms of its arms sales with the US, according to the Department of Defense. After CNN presented its findings, a US defense official confirmed there was an ongoing investigation into the issue.

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/02/middleeast/yemen-lost-us-arms/

Wasn't Trump bragging about selling weapons to Saudi Arabia? And now those weapons are being funneled to Al Qaeda groups?

[Tgo01]

Update on Jussie Smollett's fak...I mean very real attack by white supremacist Trump supporters.

Both Smollett and his manager claim they were on the phone with one another when the attack happened and his manager heard part of the scuffle including the "This is MAGA country!" comment. Smollett has refused to hand over his cell phone to police and hasn't provided any data that would show he was on the phone with his manager. His manager has also refused to hand over his phone or cooperate with police.

Sure is sounding like Smollett and his manager made this whole thing up in an attempt to boost Smollett's career and was never planning on getting the police involved but had to go along with it once his friend called the police.

Not looking good for team racist Smollett.

[Androidpk]

Nice faux outrage over a violent racist and homophobic crime. Really a good look for you.

[Tgo01]

Androidpk still dying on this hill huh. Video evidence could come out showing Smollett tying the "noose" around his neck and there would be Androidpk screaming "FAKE NEWS! TRUMP HIMSELF TIED THAT AROUND HIS NECK!!! FJINIQTHQIHFZNFZNFMNTQTIQTIQTIJTQIJT!!!!"

I kind of feel bad for Democrats that Androidpk is the type of person their party draws now. Sad.

[Androidpk]

Androidpk still dying on this hill huh. Video evidence could come out showing Smollett tying the "noose" around his neck and there would be Androidpk screaming "FAKE NEWS! TRUMP HIMSELF TIED THAT AROUND HIS NECK!!! FJINIQTHQIHFZNFZNFMNTQTIQTIQTIJTQIJT!!!!"

I kind of feel bad for Democrats that Androidpk is the type of person their party draws now. Sad.

I'm not the one attacking a victim of a hate crime simply because you somehow associate people experiencing and talking about rising right wing violence as a personal affront against yourself. This is your hill to die on, not mine.

[Parkbandit]

Nice faux outrage over a violent racist and homophobic crime. Really a good look for you.

That's the thing.. did a crime actually take place or was it just a staged attack for someone who wanted to get attention?

[Parkbandit]

I kind of feel bad for Democrats that Androidpk is the type of person their party draws now. Sad.

I don't. I'm glad he's no longer an alt-right Conservative.

Keep all the retards in one place.. makes them easier to identify.

[Androidpk]

Have never been a part if the alt right or alt left movement. Still an independent centrist as I've always been.

[Ashlander]

That's the thing.. did a crime actually take place or was it just a staged attack for someone who wanted to get attention?

Better question is did an attack even take place staged or not?

[Tgo01]

Better question is did an attack even take place staged or not?

All signs point to no.

Smollett originally claimed he had a broken rib, when police asked for medical records to prove his claim he then suddenly remembered it was just a bruised rib. So as far as physical injuries that we can actually see from this supposed brutal attack was a very tiny cut on his cheek.

[Parkbandit]

Have never been a part if the alt right or alt left movement. Still an independent centrist as I've always been.

Ron and Rand Paul are not centrists.
Bernie Sanders is not centrists.

Also: Kamala Harris just said we should legalize marijuana. Kamala Harris, your next "savior", is not centrist.

You are bipolar, there is no other clinical term for such manic swings.

[audioserf]

Legalizing marijuana is gaining support so rapidly that I don't consider it a radical idea at all. Honestly, weed not being legal yet falls to drug companies not wanting competition/big tobacco not wanting competition/the portion of the country who still pull out the 'THINK OF THE CHILDREN CARD THAT'S THE DEVIL'S PLANT' card. Alcohol is more harmful than weed by a long shot and a kid could walk into the kitchen and chug a beer at age 8. That kid wouldn't even know what to do with weed. Also, I don't smoke and barely drink, I just think sending people to jail for weed is beyond fucking stupid at this point.

edit: also if I get to pick between drunk motorist and stoned motorist on the road with me give me the baked guy any day.

[Androidpk]

Ron and Rand Paul are not centrists.
Bernie Sanders is not centrists.

Also: Kamala Harris just said we should legalize marijuana. Kamala Harris, your next "savior", is not centrist.

You are bipolar, there is no other clinical term for such manic swings.

1. Donald Trump is not a conservative.
2. Marijuana isn't a radical issue.
3. You're the dumbest troll on the PC.

[Stumplicker]

Yeah there's...no real reason not to legalize marijuana at this point. I don't smoke it, and I am vehemently anti-drug to boot, but it doesn't raise crime levels in the places where it's been decriminalized, it doesn't cause harmful effects, at least not in any greater capacity than other legalized substances, and it's a taxable revenue stream with a guaranteed customer base. It also lends support to economies that may be hurting from the decline of smoking. Yes, the big tobacco companies have long been diversified and have other markets cornered, including the "quit smoking" market, but on the whole I'd bet there's a decrease in revenue since their heyday. Those companies and the farmers who support them are already set up to mass produce, package, and distribute marijuana in place of tobacco.

Legalization of marijuana can very much be viewed in a light as a "centrist" policy at this point.

[Androidpk]

Yes, the big tobacco companies have long been diversified and have other markets cornered, including the "quit smoking" market

I'm surprised they haven't jumped onto the green industry yet.

[Parkbandit]

1. Donald Trump is not a conservative.
2. Marijuana isn't a radical issue.
3. You're the dumbest troll on the PC.

1. Strawman. Who here said he was? He was the lesser of two evils... plus the meltdown you experience was icing on the cake.
2. Strawman. Who here said it was? You are a 1 issue voter.
3. Deflection. But please.. explain why you are a centrist again.. because that is hilarious.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah there's...no real reason not to legalize marijuana at this point. I don't smoke it, and I am vehemently anti-drug to boot, but it doesn't raise crime levels in the places where it's been decriminalized, it doesn't cause harmful effects, at least not in any greater capacity than other legalized substances, and it's a taxable revenue stream with a guaranteed customer base. It also lends support to economies that may be hurting from the decline of smoking. Yes, the big tobacco companies have long been diversified and have other markets cornered, including the "quit smoking" market, but on the whole I'd bet there's a decrease in revenue since their heyday. Those companies and the farmers who support them are already set up to mass produce, package, and distribute marijuana in place of tobacco.

Legalization of marijuana can very much be viewed in a light as a "centrist" policy at this point.

Explain how tobacco is so bad for your health because smoking it is bad.. and how marijuana is somehow not bad for you by smoking it?

[Stumplicker]

I'm surprised they haven't jumped onto the green industry yet.

Yes. I'm sure "Multibillion dollar corporation openly breaks federal and state laws to tap still illegal market" would not be a perfect target for legalization's political opposition.

In the likely event that you've smoked too much pot to tell: Yes. That was sarcasm.

[Stumplicker]

Explain how tobacco is so bad for your health because smoking it is bad.. and how marijuana is somehow not bad for you by smoking it?

No. I have no need to explain a stance I didn't take. Good luck with that though.

[Androidpk]

1. Strawman. Who here said he was? He was the lesser of two evils... plus the meltdown you experience was icing on the cake.
2. Strawman. Who here said it was? You are a 1 issue voter.
3. Deflection. But please.. explain why you are a centrist again.. because that is hilarious.

Didn't you vote for Reagan? The only bipolar voter here is you.

[Androidpk]

Yes. I'm sure "Multibillion dollar corporation openly breaks federal and state laws to tap still illegal market" would not be a perfect target for legalization's political opposition.

In the likely event that you've smoked too much pot to tell: Yes. That was sarcasm.

It's a multi-billion dollar industry as it stands now. They wouldn't be concerned just because it's still illegal on the federal level. Companies in Cali, Oregon, Washington, and elsewhere, are raking up the cash.

[Stumplicker]

It's a multi-billion dollar industry as it stands now. They wouldn't be concerned just because it's still illegal on the federal level. Companies in Cali, Oregon, Washington, and elsewhere, are raking up the cash.

And the tobacco companies as well as their production chains are based in states where it's illegal both at a Federal AND state level.

[Androidpk]

Forgot about this

Earlier this month, tobacco major Altria indicated that it would pay about $1.8 billion for a 45% stake in Canadian marijuana company Cronos Group. Altria also has an option to take a majority interest in Cronos in the future. While the deal could help Altria diversify beyond the declining cigarette market, it could prove significantly beneficial to Cronos from both a financial and strategic perspective.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2018/12/26/cronos-group-benefits-from-the-altria-deal-in-multiple-ways/#2b0fb3a73648

Altria (from Wiki) - Altria Group, Inc. (renamed from Philip Morris Companies Inc. on January 27, 2003) is an American corporation and one of the world's largest producers and marketers of tobacco, cigarettes and related products. It operates worldwide and is headquartered in Henrico County, Virginia, just outside the city of Richmond.

[Parkbandit]

Didn't you vote for Reagan? The only bipolar voter here is you.

Yes.. because the jump from Rand Paul to Bernie Sanders is a smaller gap than Reagan to Trump.

Your “NOU” game is as weak as your character.

[Androidpk]

Yes.. because the jump from Rand Paul to Bernie Sanders is a smaller gap than Reagan to Trump.

Your “NOU” game is as weak as your character.

From tearing down walls to building walls.

From fighting Russian corruption and influence to embracing it with open arms.

From an actual commander in chief to one that actively sides with hostile nation's leaders over his own military and intelligence leaders.

From a President that secured international treaties on nuclear weapons to a president that leaves them.

From a President that is revered in American history to one that is going to be reviled.


There isn't a small gap between Reagan and Trump, there's a massive fucking canyon, so GTFO with your lame ass "bipolar" trolling.

[Wrathbringer]

From tearing down walls to building walls.

From fighting Russian corruption and influence to embracing it with open arms.

From an actual commander in chief to one that actively sides with hostile nation's leaders over his own military and intelligence leaders.

From a President that secured international treaties on nuclear weapons to a president that leaves them.

From a President that is revered in American history to one that is going to be reviled.


There isn't a small gap between Reagan and Trump, there's a massive fucking canyon, so GTFO with your lame ass "bipolar" trolling.

Dear god you're a huge fucking retard and don't even realize it.

[Tgo01]

From tearing down walls to building walls.

Androidpk thinks Trump wants to build a wall to keep US citizens in. I knew Androidpk was dumb, but holy shit.

[Androidpk]

Why am I not surprised Tgo is incapable of countering my statement so he resorts to making up a strawman argument. :lol:

[Tgo01]

Why am I not surprised Tgo is incapable of countering my statement so he resorts to making up a strawman argument. :lol:

You said Reagan wanted to tear down the Berlin Wall while Trump wants to build walls. Surely you know the Berlin Wall was designed to keep East Germans in and not keep West Germans out right?

What's next on Androidpk's greatest hits, Hitler wasn't really that bad of a guy?

[Stumplicker]

Let's uh...let's not forget that Reagan also conspired with foreign governments to sell arms through Iran to South American rebels, and the administration destroyed or withheld tons of documents when its involvement was being investigated.

That is a thing that happened.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

[Androidpk]

You said Reagan wanted to tear down the Berlin Wall while Trump wants to build walls. Surely you know the Berlin Wall was designed to keep East Germans in and not keep West Germans out right?

What's next on Androidpk's greatest hits, Hitler wasn't really that bad of a guy?

Why did Reagan want the wall torn down? Because it was inhumane. Why are so many Americans opposed to Trump's wall fantasy? Because it's inhumane. It's like you aren't even trying anymore, tgo, your trolling is as sad and pathetic as parkbandit's. Even had to go so far as invoking Godwin's Law. You must be really desperate to score some internet points against me :/

[Wrathbringer]

Why did Reagan want the wall torn down? Because it was inhumane. Why are so many Americans opposed to Trump's wall fantasy? Because it's inhumane. It's like you aren't even trying anymore, tgo, your trolling is as sad and pathetic as parkbandit's :/

Why does everyone think you're retarded? Because you're retarded. Why does everyone think you're a thief? Because you're a thief. Why does everyone think you're stupid? Because you're stupid. It's like you're trying really hard and just failing. Again. At everything. Your mental capacity is the only thing here that is sad and pathetic.

[Tgo01]

Why did Reagan want the wall torn down? Because it was inhumane.

It was inhumane because it restricted the travel of it's own citizens. Their own citizens were murdered if they tried to cross the border into Western Germany. Holy shit you're so fucking dumb it hurts me just to think about how dumb you are.

Here, Androidpk, I'll throw you a bone. If Trump proposed a border wall in which American citizens were not allowed to cross the border and would be killed on sight if they attempted to leave the country I would be 100% behind you in saying his ambitions are inhumane and he should be removed from office.

But you would have to be the dumbest person to have ever existed to think that's what Trump is trying to do. Oh wait, you are the dumbest person to have ever existed so this makes sense. Carry on.

[Wrathbringer]

It was inhumane because it restricted the travel of it's own citizens. Their own citizens were murdered if they tried to cross the border into Western Germany. Holy shit you're so fucking dumb it hurts me just to think about how dumb you are.

Here, Androidpk, I'll throw you a bone. If Trump proposed a border wall in which American citizens were not allowed to cross the border and would be killed on sight if they attempted to leave the country I would be 100% behind you in saying his ambitions are inhumane and he should be removed from office.

But you would have to be the dumbest person to have ever existed to think that's what Trump is trying to do. Oh wait, you are the dumbest person to have ever existed so this makes sense. Carry on.

You are arguing with a willfully ignorant and retarded moron with a terminal case of TDS. You're not going to teach him anything. He's not interested in being right. He's interested in bashing Trump.

[Androidpk]

It was inhumane because it restricted the travel of it's own citizens. Their own citizens were murdered if they tried to cross the border into Western Germany. Holy shit you're so fucking dumb it hurts me just to think about how dumb you are.

Here, Androidpk, I'll throw you a bone. If Trump proposed a border wall in which American citizens were not allowed to cross the border and would be killed on sight if they attempted to leave the country I would be 100% behind you in saying his ambitions are inhumane and he should be removed from office.

But you would have to be the dumbest person to have ever existed to think that's what Trump is trying to do. Oh wait, you are the dumbest person to have ever existed so this makes sense. Carry on.

Someone's angry, maybe parkbandit will cuddle with you until you feelings calm down? :lol:

[Stumplicker]

It's also kind of funny because a bit ago he claimed that the Berlin wall didn't even work as a deterrent from people crossing it. Now he's claiming that it worked so well that it needed to be torn down because it was inhumane.

[Wrathbringer]

Someone's angry, maybe parkbandit will cuddle with you until you feelings calm down? :lol:

Someone's retarded with TDS, maybe t4f will cuddle on her couch with you until your feelings calm down? :lol:

[Androidpk]

It's also kind of funny because a bit ago he claimed that the Berlin wall didn't even work as a deterrent from people crossing it. Now he's claiming that it worked so well that it needed to be torn down because it was inhumane.

1. It didn't deter people from trying to cross it.
2. I never said it needed to be town down "because it worked so well." Stick the facts instead of making them up like tgo and parkbandit.

[Parkbandit]

From tearing down walls to building walls.

From fighting Russian corruption and influence to embracing it with open arms.

From an actual commander in chief to one that actively sides with hostile nation's leaders over his own military and intelligence leaders.

From a President that secured international treaties on nuclear weapons to a president that leaves them.

From a President that is revered in American history to one that is going to be reviled.


There isn't a small gap between Reagan and Trump, there's a massive fucking canyon, so GTFO with your lame ass "bipolar" trolling.

"No, seriously guyz.. I'm a centrist!" - 2019 Androidpk

lulz

[Parkbandit]

Why did Reagan want the wall torn down? Because it was inhumane.

You realize that the BERLIN wall was put up to cut a country in half right?


Why are so many Americans opposed to Trump's wall fantasy? Because it's inhumane.

Specifically, how is it "inhumane" to secure a country's border?

Be specific.. not that it hurts your feelings.


It's like you aren't even trying anymore, tgo, your trolling is as sad and pathetic as parkbandit's. Even had to go so far as invoking Godwin's Law. You must be really desperate to score some internet points against me :/

Dude.. the score is Androidpk 0 - the rest of the Internet 1,921,322,211.333

Stop being stupid in every single post JUST to get a title shot for the title.

[Parkbandit]

Someone's angry, maybe parkbandit will cuddle with you until you feelings calm down? :lol:

Androidpk Defense Mechanism #5: "No, you're gay!"

[Stumplicker]

1. It didn't deter people from trying to cross it.
2. I never said it needed to be town down "because it worked so well." Stick the facts instead of making them up like tgo and parkbandit.

Yes. It did deter people from trying to cross it. Just like you were told before when you said it didn't. Here you go again. With facts. I know you're allergic to those:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_attempts_and_victims_of_the_inner_German_bo rder

"Between 1945 and 1988, around 4 million East Germans migrated to the West. 3.454 million of them left between 1945 and the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961. The great majority simply walked across the border or, after 1952, exited through West Berlin. After the border was fortified and the Berlin Wall was constructed, the number of illegal border crossings fell drastically. The numbers fell further as the border defenses were improved over the subsequent decades."

4 million illegal crossings between creation of the border and end of the wall. 3.454 million of those before the wall existed. As the border became more secure, illegal crossings and attempted illegal crossings dropped dramatically.

[Androidpk]

Be specific..

Coming from the sadist troll that still refuses to specify his sources on the FBI/SCO investigation being a massive conspiracy started by Hillary Clinton's super secret handlers :lol:

[Parkbandit]

1. It didn't deter people from trying to cross it.

Source that the Berlin Wall didn't deter people from trying to cross it?

I know, I know... it's my job to factcheck you because you are entirely too busy picking coins out of the couch you're currently residing on...


2. I never said it needed to be town down "because it worked so well." Stick the facts instead of making them up like tgo and parkbandit.

Let's see those "facts" that the Berlin Wall didn't deter people from trying to cross it.

Sounds like you just made that up.. weird.

[Neveragain]

Yes. It did deter people from trying to cross it. Just like you were told before when you said it didn't. Here you go again. With facts. I know you're allergic to those:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_attempts_and_victims_of_the_inner_German_bo rder

"Between 1945 and 1988, around 4 million East Germans migrated to the West. 3.454 million of them left between 1945 and the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961. The great majority simply walked across the border or, after 1952, exited through West Berlin. After the border was fortified and the Berlin Wall was constructed, the number of illegal border crossings fell drastically. The numbers fell further as the border defenses were improved over the subsequent decades."

4 million illegal crossings between creation of the border and end of the wall. 3.454 million of those before the wall existed. As the border became more secure, illegal crossings and attempted illegal crossings dropped dramatically.

Don't bother, PK skipped history class for gender studies.

[Parkbandit]

Coming from the sadist troll that still refuses to specify his sources on the FBI/SCO investigation being a massive conspiracy started by Hillary Clinton's super secret handlers :lol:

So.. you can't be specific.

I never saw this coming. Much like you're inability to source that the Berlin Wall didn't deter people from crossing...

GTFO of here with your weak ass shit that makes no sense. You aren't even trying at this point. OMG IN BEFORE YOUR NEXT RESPONSE OF "I'M NOT GOING ANYWHERE, I'LL POST WHATEVER I WANT!"

[Androidpk]

NOU!

You're such a low energy troll. Too bad there isn't a blue pill for that.

[Tgo01]

1. It didn't deter people from trying to cross it.

You're right it didn't deter people from TRYING to cross it, but it sure prevented almost everyone from crossing it.

Before the wall was built almost 4 million people fled East Berlin to the west, after the wall was built only 100k tried to flee the country with just a couple thousand succeeding.

There's a big difference between being ignorant and dumb and purposefully not understanding facts and history because you would rather bash Trump than get the facts right.

I wonder if Androidpk has noticed lately that his usual defenders are nowhere to be found? It seems all but sellstuff1 has had enough of trying to find ways to defend his absolutely batshit insane ideas.

[Androidpk]

All of this trolling just to deflect from the losers that went from Reagan to Trump. Sad, even for you lot. :lol:

[Tgo01]

All of this trolling just to deflect from the losers that went from Reagan to Trump. Sad, even for you lot. :lol:

I was like -4 when Reagan was first elected. Androidpk not only thinks the Soviet Union in East Germany was great, but is also really bad at math.

I wonder if Androidpk realizes the Soviet Union went on to become RUSSIA!!!! So the real Russian collusion was between he and Russia. Interesting.

[Parkbandit]

I fantasize about men with erections

Dude, there isn't much lower energy than someone who can't/won't leave the house he's squatting in because it would be too much for him.

[Androidpk]

Dude, there isn't much lower energy than someone who can't/won't leave the house he's squatting in because it would be too much for him.

Good thing I own my own house then. Try harder troll.

[Androidpk]

Androidpk not only thinks the Soviet Union in East Germany was great

Again with making up lies because you can't come up with an actual rebuttal. Go back to defending neo nazis and white supremacists committing hate crimes.

[Gelston]

Soviets had cool uniforms though. All our enemies always have cool uniforms.

[Astray]

Soviets had cool uniforms though. All our enemies always have cool uniforms.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/9e/Enemy_Gold_FilmPoster.jpeg/220px-Enemy_Gold_FilmPoster.jpeg

[Tgo01]

Soviets had cool uniforms though. All our enemies always have cool uniforms.

Racist.

[Androidpk]

Soviets had cool uniforms though. All our enemies always have cool uniforms.

Yeah but their paint schemes for military vehicles suck. At least that light blue color, I don't like it.

[Gelston]

Yeah but their paint schemes for military vehicles suck. At least that light blue color, I don't like it.

I always just liked solid olive drab or tan for vehicles. As far as camo, I like what we have the best. Multicam and MarPat.

[Astray]

I always just liked solid olive drab or tan for vehicles. As far as camo, I like what we have the best. Multicam and MarPat.

Hell yeah.

[Androidpk]

I always just liked solid olive drab or tan for vehicles. As far as camo, I like what we have the best. Multicam and MarPat.

The solid green/tan colors are great but there is just something god awful about that blue they like to use.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/XKtET.jpg

[Astray]

Nah dude, that's fine.

[Androidpk]

Now this is some real bullshit.. A Republican from the West Virginia legislation, Eric Porterfield, appeared in an interview to defend his comments that LGBTQ people are the modern day KKK, said he would drown his own kids if it turned out they were gay. How much of a shitty person do you have to be to say you'd murder your own kids just because you don't approve of their sexuality?

https://lgbtqnation-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/2019/02/eric-porterfield-702x521.jpg


“Well, I would dress my daughter first, as I would take her for a pedicure, I’d take her to get her nails done, and see if she could swim,” Porterfield said, smiling.


“If it was my son, I would probably take him hunting, I would take him fishing, then I’d see if he could swim,” Porterfield, still smiling.


The reporter asked him to clarify. “I just want to make sure they could swim,” he repeated when questioned, continuing to grin.


She again asked him to clarify, and he said, “That’s it. I’d take them out to do activities.” He was still smiling, as if threatening to kill his own children were cute.

[Parkbandit]

Good thing I own my own house then. Try harder troll.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx1eM/giphy.gif

[Gelston]

Now this is some real bullshit.. A Republican from the West Virginia legislation, Eric Porterfield, appeared in an interview to defend his comments that LGBTQ people are the modern day KKK, said he would drown his own kids if it turned out they were gay. How much of a shitty person do you have to be to say you'd murder your own kids just because you don't approve of their sexuality?

https://lgbtqnation-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/2019/02/eric-porterfield-702x521.jpg


“Well, I would dress my daughter first, as I would take her for a pedicure, I’d take her to get her nails done, and see if she could swim,” Porterfield said, smiling.


“If it was my son, I would probably take him hunting, I would take him fishing, then I’d see if he could swim,” Porterfield, still smiling.


The reporter asked him to clarify. “I just want to make sure they could swim,” he repeated when questioned, continuing to grin.


She again asked him to clarify, and he said, “That’s it. I’d take them out to do activities.” He was still smiling, as if threatening to kill his own children were cute.

Who?

[Alfster]

Why did Reagan want the wall torn down? Because it was inhumane. Why are so many Americans opposed to Trump's wall fantasy? Because it's inhumane. It's like you aren't even trying anymore, tgo, your trolling is as sad and pathetic as parkbandit's. Even had to go so far as invoking Godwin's Law. You must be really desperate to score some internet points against me :/

Dude. More miles of wall was built under Obama than under Trump.

This isn't some holier than thou fight. It's about whether or not Trump can even spend the amount of cash hes asking for. He hasn't even spent last year's cash. How the fuck can he logistically spend more?

[Androidpk]

Dude. More miles of wall was built under Obama than under Trump.

This isn't some holier than thou fight. It's about whether or not Trump can even spend the amount of cash hes asking for. He hasn't even spent last year's cash. How the fuck can he logistically spend more?

My opinions on the wall are the same no matter which politician/political party builds it.

[Tgo01]

Who?

He's in the state legislature. I watched the video because unlike Androidpk I no longer trust any news organization to just tell me the facts.

First of all he doesn't attack gay people personally, he is very clear he is referring to the LGBTQ community and considers them as a group as a threat. It would be like saying he doesn't necessarily think any particular member of Antifa is a terrorist but as a group Antifa certainly is a terrorist organization.

As far as him grinning it appears to be some sort of nervous tic, when he's not speaking and he's waiting for the reporter to ask him a question he's got a big shit eating grin on his face. This goes on throughout the whole 20 minute interview, not just when talking about the swimming part.

Although he doesn't specifically say he would let his kids drown his answers to that question are quite odd. It would be one thing if he just said he would take them swimming, but instead he said he would see if they could swim.

[Tgo01]

My opinions on the wall are the same no matter which politician/political party builds it.

You didn't give a single shit about the border when Obama was president. Just like you didn't give a single shit when Obama was dropping bombs on US citizens. Oh right, you were "mildly concerned."

The "centrist" everyone!

[Androidpk]

You didn't give a single shit about the border when Obama was president. Just like you didn't give a single shit when Obama was dropping bombs on US citizens. Oh right, you were "mildly concerned."

The "centrist" everyone!

Show us on the doll where the bipartisan touched you.

[Parkbandit]

Dude. More miles of wall was built under Obama than under Trump.

This isn't some holier than thou fight. It's about whether or not Trump can even spend the amount of cash hes asking for. He hasn't even spent last year's cash. How the fuck can he logistically spend more?

He was told to say "But walls are immoral" even though it makes zero sense.

[Androidpk]

He's in the state legislature. I watched the video because unlike Androidpk I no longer trust any news organization to just tell me the facts.

First of all he doesn't attack gay people personally, he is very clear he is referring to the LGBTQ community and considers them as a group as a threat. It would be like saying he doesn't necessarily think any particular member of Antifa is a terrorist but as a group Antifa certainly is a terrorist organization.

As far as him grinning it appears to be some sort of nervous tic, when he's not speaking and he's waiting for the reporter to ask him a question he's got a big shit eating grin on his face. This goes on throughout the whole 20 minute interview, not just when talking about the swimming part.

Although he doesn't specifically say he would let his kids drown his answers to that question are quite odd. It would be one thing if he just said he would take them swimming, but instead he said he would see if they could swim.

Why am I not surprised our resident scumlord is the first one to defend a father saying he'd murder his own children if they were gay/lesbian. ​I'm shocked!

[Fortybox]

I'm a creepy stalker that loves couches.

Yes, we know.

[Ashlander]

Why am I not surprised our resident scumlord is the first one to defend a father saying he'd murder his own children if they were gay/lesbian. ​I'm shocked!

Because he didn't?

Edit: Tgo that is, not the guy.

[~Rocktar~]

Now this is some real bullshit.. A Republican from the West Virginia legislation, Eric Porterfield, appeared in an interview to defend his comments that LGBTQ people are the modern day KKK, said he would drown his own kids if it turned out they were gay. How much of a shitty person do you have to be to say you'd murder your own kids just because you don't approve of their sexuality?

I don't know, tell us how shitty you and other Liberals have to be to think it's ok to murder a full term baby moments before birth because it might be an inconvience to the "mother" since it is only a bundle of cells until birth? And then to determine that if an abortion failed and the baby was born anyway, it would be ok to kill it or let it die?

[Back]

I don't know, tell us how shitty you and other Liberals have to be to think it's ok to murder a full term baby moments before birth because it might be an inconvience to the "mother" since it is only a bundle of cells until birth? And then to determine that if an abortion failed and the baby was born anyway, it would be ok to kill it or let it die?

Jezus. Exaggerate much? No one is aborting full term babies moments before birth. No one is advocating for that either.

You self righteous "saviors of the unborn" are awful. You expend all this vitriolic energy on some mythical legion of innocent babies yet turn your back on real people in this world who need real help.

Our society has deemed abortion a right. Disagree with abortion? Don't get one and mind your own damn business.

[Parkbandit]

Jezus. Exaggerate much? No one is aborting full term babies moments before birth. No one is advocating for that either.

You self righteous "saviors of the unborn" are awful. You expend all this vitriolic energy on some mythical legion of innocent babies yet turn your back on real people in this world who need real help.

Our society has deemed abortion a right. Disagree with abortion? Don't get one and mind your own damn business.

The pro-life viewpoint is that they are protecting the babies that have no voice whether or not they live or die. Not their own baby, all babies.

And maybe you can tell everyone here what the changes to the Virginia abortion law and the New York abortion law?

And for what it's worth: I'm pro-choice up to the first trimester.

[Back]

The pro-life viewpoint is that they are protecting the babies that have no voice whether or not they live or die. Not their own baby, all babies.

And maybe you can tell everyone here what the changes to the Virginia abortion law and the New York abortion law?

And for what it's worth: I'm pro-choice up to the first trimester.

Having a desire to help is great! Saving babies is great. Just a suggestion, but helping actual already born babies from being killed by war, starvation, crime, lack of medical resources, or bad tacos, would be a great way to focus all that good energy.

The majority of people in our democratic society have already determined that people have the right to make their own choices, especially the people it affects the most, women.

[Gelston]

Having a desire to help is great! Saving babies is great. Just a suggestion, but helping actual already born babies from being killed by war, starvation, crime, lack of medical resources, or bad tacos, would be a great way to focus all that good energy.

The majority of people in our democratic society have already determined that people have the right to make their own choices, especially the people it affects the most, women.

Except they literally just changed the law in NY to be able to abort babies in the third trimester. You apparently just overlook the pure evil your party enables.

Btw, it doesn't effect women the most, it effects those people it murders a lot more.

[Parkbandit]

Having a desire to help is great! Saving babies is great. Just a suggestion, but helping actual already born babies from being killed by war, starvation, crime, lack of medical resources, or bad tacos, would be a great way to focus all that good energy.

The majority of people in our democratic society have already determined that people have the right to make their own choices, especially the people it affects the most, women.

1) So you can't tell everyone about the changes made to the Virginia and NY abortion laws. Do you even know about them?

2) If Roe vs. Wade is overturned, will you also be on the "front lines" saying that it's now the law and we just need to get behind it.. or is it only laws you agree with that you will virtue signal?

3) You still don't understand the pro-life mindset. They are specifically trying to give a voice to the babies yet to be born since they cannot speak for themselves. It's not a difficult concept to understand.. yet, here we go for the 2nd time...

[Back]

Except they literally just changed the law in NY to be able to abort babies in the third trimester. You apparently just overlook the pure evil your party enables.

Btw, it doesn't effect women the most, it effects those people it murders a lot more.

Ok ok. Now you're just fucking around. Ha ha.

Just wait until we harvest enough pure souls. Then we will summon the Unspoken and rule the universe for a million eons.

[Gelston]

Ok ok. Now you're just fucking around. Ha ha.

Just wait until we harvest enough pure souls. Then we will summon the Unspoken and rule the universe for a million eons.

... What? No I'm not. This happened. Go ahead and put your hands over your ears and yell so you don't hear it though. I know how uncomfortable it must be to be associated with the party that sanctions the murder of babies.

[Parkbandit]

Ok ok. Now you're just fucking around. Ha ha.

Just wait until we harvest enough pure souls. Then we will summon the Unspoken and rule the universe for a million eons.

Have you read the NY law yet or are you getting all your information from motherjones.com still?

[Parkbandit]

... What? No I'm not. This happened. Go ahead and put your hands over your ears and yell so you don't hear it though. I know how uncomfortable it must be to be associated with the party that sanctions the murder of babies.

That's the thing though... he will look at it as safeguarding the planet from overpopulation.

He's the real hero here.

#RESIST OVERPOPULATION!

[Back]

Truly some comedy gold, gentlemen.

The law has been passed. If you really and truly have the time and energy to put into your cause, then fight it legislatively instead of virtue signaling on the internet. Meanwhile, actual babies and people in this world legitimately need help from potentially deadly situations. You've got options.

[Gelston]

Truly some comedy gold, gentlemen.

The law has been passed. If you really and truly have the time and energy to put into your cause, then fight it legislatively instead of virtue signaling on the internet. Meanwhile, actual babies and people in this world legitimately need help from potentially deadly situations. You've got options.

.... Yes, we're aware that NY has passed a law that legalizes the murder of babies. Why do you support murder? And you trying to call out anyone for "virtue signaling on the internet" is just pure fucking irony. And those are actual babies. Being murdered.

And who says I don't help with other causes? I give to St Judes. I volunteer for charities like Camp Tiger. I do go out and do stuff. I'm guessing you probably just talk shit on the internet though.

[Parkbandit]

Truly some comedy gold, gentlemen.

The law has been passed. If you really and truly have the time and energy to put into your cause, then fight it legislatively instead of virtue signaling on the internet. Meanwhile, actual babies and people in this world legitimately need help from potentially deadly situations. You've got options.

Dude.. did you really just call someone out for virtue signalling??

That is why you are the champion. I can't even set up a title defense for you with moves like that.

NO ONE wants to face you.

NO ONE can face you.

You are the champ.

[Parkbandit]

.... Yes, we're aware that NY has passed a law that legalizes the murder of babies. Why do you support murder? And you trying to call out anyone for "virtue signaling on the internet" is just pure fucking irony. And those are actual babies. Being murdered.

And who says I don't help with other causes? I give to St Judes. I volunteer for charities like Camp Tiger. I do go out and do stuff. I'm guessing you probably just talk shit on the internet though.


It's not talking shit if you put a hashtag in front of it. It's being the Internet Warrior he was born and not aborted to be.

#Resist White Supremacy

[Tgo01]

The majority of people in our democratic society have already determined that people have the right to make their own choices, especially the people it affects the most, women.

It's funny you think this is about choice. There has already been one case in NY where a man murdered a pregnant woman and was charged with not only her murder but the murder of the unborn baby, but now the murder charges against the baby have been dropped because this law no longer makes it a crime to harm a baby in the womb, no matter who is the one doing harm.

So much for a woman's choice huh? Even if the woman wants to give birth to the baby a random man can come up and hit her in the stomach with a baseball bat and face no charges for harming the baby.

Face it, Back, this law is about the most evil law in recent memory, but you're all too happy to defend it because as cwolff would say; it's all about "us" vs "them" for you.

[Back]

It's funny you think this is about choice. There has already been one case in NY where a man murdered a pregnant woman and was charged with not only her murder but the murder of the unborn baby, but now the murder charges against the baby have been dropped because this law no longer makes it a crime to harm a baby in the womb, no matter who is the one doing harm.

So much for a woman's choice huh? Even if the woman wants to give birth to the baby a random man can come up and hit her in the stomach with a baseball bat and face no charges for harming the baby.

Face it, Back, this law is about the most evil law in recent memory, but you're all too happy to defend it because as cwolff would say; it's all about "us" vs "them" for you.

Hysteria and paranoia aside...

When looking at laws, or rules, you have to take into account the "intent" of the law or rule. Why is it a law or rule? Then you can look at how it applies to a situation.

The intent of the recent law is to protect the woman's health, not to allow people to attack pregnant women to kill their unborn baby and get away with it without repercussion.

I understand your fear of what you think this law may legally allow, and extreme circumstances should be taken into account and the law changed if necessary, but no one is advocating for the murder of babies.

[Methais]

From tearing down walls to building walls.

From fighting Russian corruption and influence to embracing it with open arms.

From an actual commander in chief to one that actively sides with hostile nation's leaders over his own military and intelligence leaders.

From a President that secured international treaties on nuclear weapons to a president that leaves them.

From a President that is revered in American history to one that is going to be reviled.


There isn't a small gap between Reagan and Trump, there's a massive fucking canyon, so GTFO with your lame ass "bipolar" trolling.

The fact that you can't differentiate between the Berlin wall and a US/Mexico border wall shows how utterly stupid you are and will always be.

[Androidpk]

Hysteria and paranoia aside...

That's all they have left at this point, don't take that away from them too.

[Methais]

Why does everyone think you're retarded? Because you're retarded. Why does everyone think you're a thief? Because you're a thief. Why does everyone think you're stupid? Because you're stupid. It's like you're trying really hard and just failing. Again. At everything. Your mental capacity is the only thing here that is sad and pathetic.

This is correct.


Someone's angry, maybe parkbandit will cuddle with you until you feelings calm down? :lol:

Ever notice how literally every time your stupidity is called out you immediately deflect?

If not, then you're the only person on the PC who doesn't notice. Though I'm sure you do too, you've just accepted what a massive failure at everything you are and I guess decided to roll with it.

But for real, you should really take like 5 minutes one day and think about how stupid you are. Not that it'll do any good, because stupid people tend to think they're the smartest person in every room they enter.

[Tgo01]

Hysteria and paranoia aside...

When looking at laws, or rules, you have to take into account the "intent" of the law or rule. Why is it a law or rule? Then you can look at how it applies to a situation.

The intent of the recent law is to protect the woman's health, not to allow people to attack pregnant women to kill their unborn baby and get away with it without repercussion.

I understand your fear of what you think this law may legally allow, and extreme circumstances should be taken into account and the law changed if necessary, but no one is advocating for the murder of babies.

You're not understanding, this isn't my "fear" of what may legally be allowed, it's written into the law that someone killing a baby in the womb will NOT be held accountable for any crime. At least one person has already had charges dropped for murdering a baby in the womb.

This is why the far left is pathetic, you're so afraid to call out an obviously bad law for fear you might be kicked out of the club for supposedly not caring about women's rights. Might be time to rethink your entire life if you think "fighting for a woman's right to choose" also includes protecting a third party for murdering a woman's unborn child.

[Tgo01]

That's all they have left at this point, don't take that away from them too.

It's never a good sign when Androidpk is the first to come to your rescue, Back. Seriously have a hard long look at your political beliefs, because they are apparently shared by Androidpk.

[Methais]

I know, I know... it's my job to factcheck you because you are entirely too busy picking coins out of the couch you're currently residing on...

Let's be real, any change that might have been in that couch was picked clean within the first hour on day 1.

[Androidpk]

It's never a good sign when Androidpk is the first to come to your rescue, Back. Seriously have a hard long look at your political beliefs, because they are apparently shared by Androidpk.

This coming from the troll scum that defended a MAGA father who said he'd murder his own children if they were gay. :lol:

[Neveragain]

It's funny you think this is about choice. There has already been one case in NY where a man murdered a pregnant woman and was charged with not only her murder but the murder of the unborn baby, but now the murder charges against the baby have been dropped because this law no longer makes it a crime to harm a baby in the womb, no matter who is the one doing harm.

So much for a woman's choice huh? Even if the woman wants to give birth to the baby a random man can come up and hit her in the stomach with a baseball bat and face no charges for harming the baby.

Face it, Back, this law is about the most evil law in recent memory, but you're all too happy to defend it because as cwolff would say; it's all about "us" vs "them" for you.

Just the simple law of statistics would suggest that half the children being murdered are female.

Democrats:

May I choose to not have health insurance?

Dem: No!

May I choose to own a gun?

Dem: No!

May I choose to invest my own money for retirement?

Dem: No!

May I kill my babies?

Dem: YES!!!!!!!!!!

[Methais]

Show us on the doll where the bipartisan touched you. In my case, the doll is time4fun, and she touched me here: *points toward gaping wrecked anus*

This is correct.

[Back]

You're not understanding, this isn't my "fear" of what may legally be allowed, it's written into the law that someone killing a baby in the womb will NOT be held accountable for any crime. At least one person has already had charges dropped for murdering a baby in the womb.

This is why the far left is pathetic, you're so afraid to call out an obviously bad law for fear you might be kicked out of the club for supposedly not caring about women's rights. Might be time to rethink your entire life if you think "fighting for a woman's right to choose" also includes protecting a third party for murdering a woman's unborn child.

You are cherry-picking. I said if the law needs changing to prevent something unintended from happening it should be changed.

I'm not convinced your interpretation is accurate. What part of the law do you think allows people to attack pregnant women and get away without repercussion? What part of the law do you think says you can kill a baby moments before it is born?

[RichardCranium]

You are cherry-picking. I said if the law needs changing to prevent something unintended from happening it should be changed.

I'm not convinced your interpretation is accurate. What part of the law do you think allows people to attack pregnant women and get away without repercussion? What part of the law do you think says you can kill a baby moments before it is born?

No one is killing babies full term out of inconvenience with this law. There does seem to be an unintended side-effect when it comes to pregnant women being attacked that needs to be addressed.

[Tgo01]

You are cherry-picking. I said if the law needs changing to prevent something unintended from happening it should be changed.

You're STILL not getting it. The law was written like that on purpose to cement the Democrat position that life begins at birth.


I'm not convinced your interpretation is accurate. What part of the law do you think allows people to attack pregnant women and get away without repercussion? What part of the law do you think says you can kill a baby moments before it is born?

It is literally written in plain text in the bill.

https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=S00240&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y


Homicide means conduct which causes the death of a person under circumstances constituting murder, manslaughter in the first degree, manslaughter in the second degree, or criminally negligent homicide
"Person," when referring to the victim of a homicide, means a human being who has been born and is alive.

As far as killing a baby moments before born I direct you yet again to the text of the law I linked to:


Abortion. 1. A health care practitioner licensed, certi-
43 fied, or authorized under title eight of the education law, acting with-
44 in his or her lawful scope of practice, may perform an abortion when,
45 according to the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional
46 judgment based on the facts of the patient's case: the patient is within
47 twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an
48 absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the
49 patient's life or health.

Right there in black in white. None of this is even remotely ambiguous.

[Back]

You're STILL not getting it. The law was written like that on purpose to cement the Democrat position that life begins at birth.

It is literally written in plain text in the bill.

https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=S00240&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y

I think you're being conspiratorial. Read the intent of the law. This is all about protecting women and their health.


As far as killing a baby moments before born I direct you yet again to the text of the law I linked to:


Abortion. 1. A health care practitioner licensed, certi-
43 fied, or authorized under title eight of the education law, acting with-
44 in his or her lawful scope of practice, may perform an abortion when,
45 according to the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional
46 judgment based on the facts of the patient's case: the patient is within
47 twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an
48 absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the
49 patient's life or health.



Right there in black in white. None of this is even remotely ambiguous.

24 weeks isn't "moments before birth".

At this point I'd like to point out there are other conditions to this law that in no way allow people to murder babies the moment before they are born. Notably...



the requirements of the health care practitioner
the good faith and reasonable judgment of said practitioner
the procedure being done in the specific case of reducing possible risk to the patient's health
in the case that the fetus is not viable.

[Tgo01]

Intent doesn't matter. If the law spells out in plain English that homicide can only be committed against someone who was born and alive then homicide can only be committed against someone who was born and alive. This isn't a complicated concept, Back.

You're right 24 weeks isn't "moments before birth" it's the "or" in that statement that allows for abortions past 24 weeks.

Don't you find it strange the law used to require 3 doctors to say an abortion is necessary to save the patient's life and now it just requires one medical practitioner to say the patient's health might be affected. Almost as if they are making it as easy as possible for a woman to find someone who will attest that an abortion is necessary to protect the woman's health, because after all if you don't specify what "protecting the woman's health" even means then it can literally mean anything to medical practitioner.

[Back]

Intent doesn't matter. If the law spells out in plain English that homicide can only be committed against someone who was born and alive then homicide can only be committed against someone who was born and alive. This isn't a complicated concept, Back.

You're right 24 weeks isn't "moments before birth" it's the "or" in that statement that allows for abortions past 24 weeks.

Don't you find it strange the law used to require 3 doctors to say an abortion is necessary to save the patient's life and now it just requires one medical practitioner to say the patient's health might be affected. Almost as if they are making it as easy as possible for a woman to find someone who will attest that an abortion is necessary to protect the woman's health, because after all if you don't specify what "protecting the woman's health" even means then it can literally mean anything to medical practitioner.

Intent very much matters. It is how we apply laws to situations.

As I have said all along, if there is something overlooked, or the law is written poorly to allow something unintended, then the law needs to be looked at and changed accordingly.

I don't find these changes strange or a part of some conspiracy to murder babies. I read the intent and believe "that comprehensive reproductive health care, including contraception and abortion, is a fundamental component of a woman's health, privacy and equality."

[Methais]

Intent very much matters. It is how we apply laws to situations.

As I have said all along, if there is something overlooked, or the law is written poorly to allow something unintended, then the law needs to be looked at and changed accordingly.

I don't find these changes strange or a part of some conspiracy to murder babies. I read the intent and believe "that comprehensive reproductive health care, including contraception and abortion, is a fundamental component of a woman's health, privacy and equality."

Remember when Comey let Hillary off the hook because he didn't think breaking the law was her intent therefore it was ok?

[Tgo01]

Intent very much matters. It is how we apply laws to situations.

No intent does not matter in law. That's why we have laws and not opinions. If the law says a person who has yet to be born cannot be murdered then a person who has yet to be born cannot be murdered. Stop being intellectually dishonest just because it's the easiest path forward.


As I have said all along, if there is something overlooked, or the law is written poorly to allow something unintended, then the law needs to be looked at and changed accordingly.

It's not "overlooked", or "written poorly." It is written very specifically because NY state wants to recognize life as starting at birth. This is written in very plain English straight from the text of the bill itself, something of which I don't think you bothered to read and instead got all of your facts from HuffPost or possibly MSNBC.

[Taernath]

No intent does not matter in law.

It does. That's why we have different levels of murder and manslaughter charges.

[Tgo01]

It does. That's why we have different levels of murder and manslaughter charges.

Those are separate crimes which have different requirements.

If the law flat out says an unborn person cannot be murdered then one cannot be charged with murdering an unborn child. Full stop. Period.

It doesn't matter if the "intent" of the law was to guarantee a woman's right to choose.

[Taernath]

Those are separate crimes which have different requirements.

One being intent.

[Tgo01]

One being intent.

Okay let's cut right through the deflections and distractions; do you think in NY one can be charged with murdering an unborn baby, intent or no intent of the purpose of the law?

[Back]

No intent does not matter in law. That's why we have laws and not opinions. If the law says a person who has yet to be born cannot be murdered then a person who has yet to be born cannot be murdered. Stop being intellectually dishonest just because it's the easiest path forward.



It's not "overlooked", or "written poorly." It is written very specifically because NY state wants to recognize life as starting at birth. This is written in very plain English straight from the text of the bill itself, something of which I don't think you bothered to read and instead got all of your facts from HuffPost or possibly MSNBC.

We are talking about an amendment to an already existing public health law in New York state. The intent of the amendment is to protect women's rights, privacy, and health. How many times have I said this?

Reading the amendment, and the intent, my interpretation is that the democratically elected lawmakers of New York state wanted to clarify some things in the public health law that could be misconstrued to TAKE AWAY women's rights, privacy, and possibly endanger their health.

If this is the plot of some vampire cabal embedded in New York state legislature then we need to call Blade.

[Tgo01]

We are talking about an amendment to an already existing public health law in New York state. The intent of the amendment is to protect women's rights, privacy, and health. How many times have I said this?

Reading the amendment, and the intent, my interpretation is that the democratically elected lawmakers of New York state wanted to clarify some things in the public health law that could be misconstrued to TAKE AWAY women's rights, privacy, and possibly endanger their health.

If this is the plot of some vampire cabal embedded in New York state legislature then we need to call Blade.

You say an awfully lot of words to hide the fact that you just don't want to admit the law is fucked up.

NY lawmaker: Let's define life as beginning at birth!
Other ghoul NY lawmakers: Sounds good!
NY lawmaker: Of course this means one can no longer be charged with murdering an unborn child so we have to update the homicide law on the books.
Other ghoul NY lawmakers: Let's get right on that!

And here's Back, thinking that was all just an oversight or something. They purposefully rewrote the homicide law on the books to specify that an unborn person cannot be the victim of a homicide. Holy shit. You're getting dangerously close to Androidpk levels of retard now.

[Taernath]

Okay let's cut right through the deflections and distractions; do you think in NY one can be charged with murdering an unborn baby, intent or no intent of the purpose of the law?

I don't even know anything about the law you're talking about, I just saw you being wrong in the activity stream, lol

[Tgo01]

I don't even know anything about the law you're talking about, I just saw you being wrong in the activity stream, lol

I'm never wrong!

[~Rocktar~]

You are cherry-picking. I said if the law needs changing to prevent something unintended from happening it should be changed.

I'm not convinced your interpretation is accurate. What part of the law do you think allows people to attack pregnant women and get away without repercussion? What part of the law do you think says you can kill a baby moments before it is born?

OK, so let me break this down for you. No one gives one rat fuck what you think about Tgo01's "interpretation" of the law or what it does. They are pointing out to you something that has ALREADY HAPPENED in reality. Not some legal scholar arguing a point, not some politician trying to make a point, an actual case where charges were dropped because of this law.

Here is a nice Liberal/Leftist article about how the law changed in New York and allows full term abortions based on an undetermined "health" of the mother. Not life threatening danger, abortion is allowed at full term if only "health" of the mother is to be protected. Now, you clearly don't know shit about what you are talking about and defending so maybe go read up and shut the fuck up. Your side is advocating the right to murder a viable baby up to the moment of delivery and decriminalizing the murder of the unborn by a third party in all cases. See the link below.

https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2019/01/22/abortion-laws-new-york-how-they-change-immediately/2643065002/

[~Rocktar~]

No one is killing babies full term out of inconvenience with this law. There does seem to be an unintended side-effect when it comes to pregnant women being attacked that needs to be addressed.

If it hasn't happened already, it is just a matter of time until some ghoul does it because delivering the baby will cause undue mental stress/"harm" to the mother.

[~Rocktar~]

I don't find these changes strange or a part of some conspiracy to murder babies. I read the intent and believe "that comprehensive reproductive health care, including contraception and abortion, is a fundamental component of a woman's health, privacy and equality."

Yep, that's because you are a raving Leftist pure and simple. Hope you never reproduce or if you do that your children get a load of genes that have been dormant and that make them better people than you.

[~Rocktar~]

We are talking about an amendment to an already existing public health law in New York state. The intent of the amendment is to protect women's rights, privacy, and health. How many times have I said this?

Reading the amendment, and the intent, my interpretation is that the democratically elected lawmakers of New York state wanted to clarify some things in the public health law that could be misconstrued to TAKE AWAY women's rights, privacy, and possibly endanger their health.

If this is the plot of some vampire cabal embedded in New York state legislature then we need to call Blade.


https://youtu.be/LQCU36pkH7c

[Tgo01]

Rumor has it that Chicago police have known for over a week the identities of the persons of interest caught on video i the Jussie Smollett attack, and they have reason to believe the entire thing was staged.

Both persons of interest are black and one of them is a fellow actor who has worked on the show Empire with Jussie.

Not looking good for Jussie Smollett or Androidpk.

Especially with Jussie Smollett doing the talk show circuit talking about this alleged attack and claiming it was because of racist and homophobic Trump supporters. If he doesn't at least lose his entire career over this then there truly is no more justice in this country. He should at the very least be arrested if police think this entire thing was staged.

[Androidpk]

Rumor has it... :lol2:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/239/110/8a8.gif

[Tgo01]

Rumor has it... :lol2:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/239/110/8a8.gif

Can't have you scrubbing this in the next few days.

[Androidpk]

Can't have you scrubbing this in the next few days.

Yes, because that's all I do, sit around and delete my posts.. Get a life, dude. Or better yet, share an actual source instead of "rumor has it" BS.

[Androidpk]

Chicago police on Thursday say they "have no evidence" to support reports they are investigating whether actor Jussie Smollett fabricated the story about his alleged assault in Chicago last month.

Chicago police spokesman said reports the attack was a hoax are "unconfirmed by case detectives" following multiple reports by Chicago news media.

Twentieth Century Fox Television and Fox Entertainment denied the allegation that the “Empire” actor was being written off the program.


“The idea that Jussie Smollett has been, or would be, written off of Empire is patently ridiculous,” the network said in a statement to multiple media outlets. “He remains a core player on this very successful series and we continue to stand behind him.”

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/430125-smollett-allegedly-staged-attack-over-being-written-off-empire

[Methais]

Yes, because that's all I do, sit around

This is correct.

[Parkbandit]

Yes, because that's all I do, sit around and delete my posts.. Get a life, dude. Or better yet, share an actual source instead of "rumor has it" BS.

Are you suggesting that you haven't sat around and deleted old posts in the past?

Get a life.. that's hilarious. Well played.

I'll make the title match.

[Fortybox]

Yes, because that's all I do, sit around and delete my posts.. Get a life, dude. Or better yet, share an actual source instead of "rumor has it" BS.

I would have said others are exaggerating about you but your post history, including how frequently you post suggests they are right - you really do sit around and spend all your time on this forum.

Get a job.

[Fortybox]

Are you suggesting that you haven't sat around and deleted old posts in the past?

Get a life.. that's hilarious. Well played.

I'll make the title match.

Might as well. time4fun left this cryptic message the other night:

[LNet]-GSIV:Vishra: "okay goodbye forever"[9:20 PM]

[Methais]

I would have said others are exaggerating about you but your post history, including how frequently you post suggests they are right - you really do sit around and spend all your time on this forum.

Get a job.

In before he scrubs 90% of his postS and is then like WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???? I HARDLY POST!!!!! SOMETHING SOMETHING TRIGGERED MAGA BOT TOXIC TROLL GRANDPA SUBPOENA NOU!!!!!

[Parkbandit]

Might as well. time4fun left this cryptic message the other night:

[LNet]-GSIV:Vishra: "okay goodbye forever"[9:20 PM]

No loss to the game.. a huge hole on this forum though.

But alas, she was soundly defeated by Backlash as he is the 2 time title holder now.

[Parkbandit]

CHICAGO -- Chicago police confirmed Thursday that detectives are talking to two persons of interest in connection with the alleged attack on "Empire" actor Jussie Smollett.


Multiple sources have told ABC7 Eyewitness News that police are investigating whether Smollett and the two men staged the attack allegedly because Smollett was being written off of "Empire."


A source familiar with the investigation told the ABC7 I-Team that Smollett failed to appear for an interview with detectives earlier Thursday, but has since spoken with police.


Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson contacted ABC7 to say they are continuing to treat Smollett as a victim and the investigation remains ongoing.


Chicago police told ABC News, "Police are investigating whether the two individuals committed the attack - or whether the attack happened at all."


Smollett released a statement Thursday evening, saying, "Today Jussie did answer routine followup questions for Chicago Police Department and continues to cooperate."


Smollett's representatives said he is not being written off "Empire."


Twentieth Century Fox Television and Fox Entertainment released a statement saying, "The idea that Jussie Smollett has been, or would be, written off of EMPIRE is patently ridiculous. He remains a core player on this very successful series and we continue to stand behind him."


A source briefed on the Smollett investigation confirmed to ABC News that Chicago police are questioning the two persons of interest -- one of whom has appeared on "Empire."

https://abc7chicago.com/sources-smollett-staged-attack-with-help-of-others-allegedly-being-written-off-empire/5138497/

[Methais]

No loss to the game.. a huge hole on this forum though.

But alas, she was soundly defeated by Backlash as he is the 2 time title holder now.

There's a 99.99999% chance she's not going anywhere and is just trolling for attention like usual.

[audioserf]

I don't play a melee class but it would be obnoxious AF to quit the game with like 95% of the good blunt weapons going into a black hole with her.

[Methais]

I don't play a melee class but it would be obnoxious AF to quit the game with like 95% of the good blunt weapons going into a black hole with her.

But just imagine how special it will make her feel.

Why do you hate special people?

[Stumplicker]

The concept of Pragmatics seems to be lost on some of you. Edit to add: And yes, I intentionally left the target of that message ambiguous to illustrate that point.

[Tgo01]

From what I've read the police are now treating the two persons of interest as suspects.

Here is a picture of the two possible suspects:

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02/15/14/9864298-6708821-image-m-14_1550242723677.jpg

Yes, these are the two men Jussie Smollett:

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/966374081527414784/FxD_C4FL_400x400.jpg

Fought off by himself while holding a cell phone in one hand and a sandwich in the other.

To be fair though they haven't been charged with assault and instead police have said they believe they are involved in a crime, leaving open the possibility the crime isn't assault, but rather helping to create fake crime.

[Methais]

From what I've read the police are now treating the two persons of interest as suspects.

Here is a picture of the two possible suspects:

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02/15/14/9864298-6708821-image-m-14_1550242723677.jpg

Yes, these are the two men Jussie Smollett:

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/966374081527414784/FxD_C4FL_400x400.jpg

Fought off by himself while holding a cell phone in one hand and a sandwich in the other.

To be fair though they haven't been charged with assault and instead police have said they believe they are involved in a crime, leaving open the possibility the crime isn't assault, but rather helping to create fake crime.

That's clearly two white dudes wearing blackbody.

[Tgo01]

That's clearly two white dudes wearing blackbody.

Well yeah, I honestly didn't even notice they were black until you pointed it out. Racist.

[Neveragain]

I don't play a melee class but it would be obnoxious AF to quit the game with like 95% of the good blunt weapons going into Time4PKanalpunishments black hole.

Fixed.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/4QFzDdeLmo19MTm9AF/source.gif

[Gelston]

BREAKING: Chicago Police release a photo of the men suspected to be Jussie Smollett attackers

https://scontent.fmem1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51855831_2064648686954418_3469424695663656960_n.jp g?_nc_cat=104&_nc_ht=scontent.fmem1-2.fna&oh=989cc45f0c82ef0930be0393e9faa01d&oe=5CFD0F6F

[Tgo01]

From what I gather so far police are at the moment treating this as an actual assault and the two pictured above are indeed the suspects of the assault.

So let's recap.

These two men:

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02/15/14/9864298-6708821-image-m-14_1550242723677.jpg

Attacked this man:

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/966374081527414784/FxD_C4FL_400x400.jpg

And while holding a sandwich and a cellphone, Smollett managed to fight off those two walking muscles while receiving just a little scratch on his cheek?

Right. Sure sounds like some cover up for Smollett going on if this is the direction the police are going.

Even if that is the direction they want to go this totally destroys Jussie Smollett's bullshit account of what happened. He didn't know these two? He sure as fuck knows at least one of them because he worked on the show Empire with him. They yelled "This is MAGA country"? Right, sure.

It was a racist and homophobic attack? Weird, from what I've read one of the two men is gay. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm............................

[Androidpk]

Deep state cover up!

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0COGmHhLQjyh5iX6/giphy.gif

[Methais]

Deep state cover up!

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0COGmHhLQjyh5iX6/giphy.gif

https://www.indeed.com/

[Parkbandit]

Deep state cover up!

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0COGmHhLQjyh5iX6/giphy.gif

So far.. only you have said anything about a deep state anything.

This could have been an assault.. but since his story keeps changing, the police are suspecting it might be staged.

[Tgo01]

I just don't understand how it went from:

2 white racist, homophobic attackers who yelled "THIS IS MAGA COUNTRY!
Jussie didn't know his attackers
he fought them off

To:

2 black people from Nigeria, one of which worked on the show Jussie plays on
Jussie follows them on Instagram so he knows them
No way in hell his 100 pound weakling ass fought off those two 4% fat bodybuilders, especially while holding a phone and a sandwich
They don't fit the profile of a Trump supporter AT ALL
Supposedly one of them is gay, also sinking Jussie's claim this was a homophobic attack

Either this was staged and these two aren't admitting it or Jussie Smollett completely 100% lied about how the attack happened. Either way Jussie should be in some legal trouble and at the very least lose his acting career.

Also let's keep in mind the police STILL haven't found any video evidence showing the actual alleged attack, so either this attack happened on the 1 square foot of that street with no video coverage or the police aren't releasing that information to the public yet for whatever reason.

[Androidpk]

So far.. only you have said anything about a deep state anything.

This could have been an assault.. but since his story keeps changing, the police are suspecting it might be staged.

Except you know, tgo talking about how it looks like a cover up to prevent the real truth from coming out.



Right. Sure sounds like some cover up for Smollett going on if this is the direction the police are going.

thanks for playing, gramps

[Methais]

Except you know, tgo talking about how it looks like a cover up to prevent the real truth from coming out.

Look at those 0 mentions of DEEP STATE!


thanks for playing, gramps

That's 1. 16 more to go before midnight!

[Tgo01]

Is Androidpk engaging in gas lighting again?

Parkbandit: No one said anything about deep state anything.
Androidpk: Yes huh! Right here! <proceeds to provide a quote where the words "deep" and "state" do not appear at all.>

[Methais]

Is Androidpk engaging in gas lighting again?

Parkbandit: No one said anything about deep state anything.
Androidpk: Yes huh! Right here! <proceeds to provide a quote where the words "deep" and "state" do not appear at all.>

PK hasn't farted or taken a dump even once since he's been crashing on time4fun's couch.

[Neveragain]

It was obviously a typo.

[Androidpk]

Is Androidpk engaging in gas lighting again?

Parkbandit: No one said anything about deep state anything.
Androidpk: Yes huh! Right here! <proceeds to provide a quote where the words "deep" and "state" do not appear at all.>

Tell us again how the police are conspiring to cover up the truth from coming out. I'm sure glad you're here to expose the deep state for us.

https://i.makeagif.com/media/2-15-2017/W5MFuC.gif

[Neveragain]

PK hasn't farted or taken a dump even once since he's been crashing on time4fun's couch.

Time4fun: You ever had your shit pushed in?

PK: What's that?

Time4fun: let me show you something.

[Methais]

Time4fun: You ever had your shit pushed in?

PK: What's that?

Time4fun: let me show you something.

The following morning...

https://media.giphy.com/media/xhvv985KTwsrm/giphy.gif

[Wrathbringer]

Time4fun: You ever had your shit pushed in?

PK: What's that?

Time4fun: let me show you something.


The following morning...

https://media.giphy.com/media/xhvv985KTwsrm/giphy.gif

:lol: One problem with that gif though; he looks like he has a job.

[Fortybox]

In before he scrubs 90% of his postS and is then like WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???? I HARDLY POST!!!!! SOMETHING SOMETHING TRIGGERED MAGA BOT TOXIC TROLL GRANDPA SUBPOENA NOU!!!!!

So far on 2/15, PK posts on average every 15 minutes

On 2/14, every 20 minutes

On 2/13, every 30 minutes

On 2/12, every 19 minutes

On 2/11, every 38 minutes

Most posts were yesterday where he literally was posting from 9AM in the morning until 9PM at night (central standard)

[rolfard]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/02/15/entertainment/jussie-smollett-suspects/index.html

Earlier Friday, police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said two Nigerian brothers were being treated as "potential suspects" and that detectives had "probable cause that they may have been involved in an alleged crime."

Police did not say at that time precisely what the brothers were accused of or what the alleged crime might have been.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/jussie-smollett-attack-police-arrest-brothers-questioned-today-2019-02-15-live-updates/

Police have raided the Chicago home of the persons of interest. Doors were broken and clothes and belongings were tossed around.

CBS Chicago station WBBM-TV reports police removed bleach, a black "facemask hat," a red hat, an "Empire" script, receipts and other items


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/police-push-back-against-claim-that-attack-on-empire-star-was-a-hoax-11550255540

Chicago Police said they have arrested two possible suspects in an attack reported last month by “Empire” television star Jussie Smollett and pushed back against a media report that the attack was staged.

Charges haven’t been filed against the suspects, who are being interviewed by investigators, police said.

“Detectives have probable cause...

[Tgo01]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/02/15/entertainment/jussie-smollett-suspects/index.html

Earlier Friday, police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said two Nigerian brothers were being treated as "potential suspects" and that detectives had "probable cause that they may have been involved in an alleged crime."

Police did not say at that time precisely what the brothers were accused of or what the alleged crime might have been.

Yeah the news on this is moving fast, it's being reported that the two are now suspects in an alleged assault.

It's looking like a staged attack but since the police have no evidence of that they are treating it as an assault like Smollett reported.

Either that or Smollett just 100% straight up lied about how the assault happened, seeing as how he knew the attackers and still managed to save his sandwich through this vicious beat down.

[Parkbandit]

Except you know, tgo talking about how it looks like a cover up to prevent the real truth from coming out.

thanks for playing, gramps

Wait.. in your tiny little pea sized brain.. a cover up must be coming from the Deep State?

thanks for being the #1 contender, retard.

[Wrathbringer]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/02/15/entertainment/jussie-smollett-suspects/index.html

Earlier Friday, police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said two Nigerian brothers were being treated as "potential suspects" and that detectives had "probable cause that they may have been involved in an alleged crime."

Police did not say at that time precisely what the brothers were accused of or what the alleged crime might have been.

cnn :lol: Better wait a couple days to see if they retract the story for not fact checking things to be sure it's not more fake news.

[Methais]

So far on 2/15, PK posts on average every 15 minutes

On 2/14, every 20 minutes

On 2/13, every 30 minutes

On 2/12, every 19 minutes

On 2/11, every 38 minutes

Most posts were yesterday where he literally was posting from 9AM in the morning until 9PM at night (central standard)

https://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gif

[Fortybox]

https://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gif

https://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gifhttp://i.imgur.com/EqQOTR9.gifhttps://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gif

[Tgo01]

This Jussie Smollett case is just pissing me off now.

So first there were several sources inside the police department that said they believed the attack was staged. But okay, anonymous sources, blah blah blah.

So the police officially come out to push back on the staged attack theory, they bring two persons of interest in for questioning, then later say they are suspects in an assault, then later say they have been officially arrested as suspects of an assault, and now they let them go with no charges and they say they have more investigative work to do.

How do these two go from being persons of interest, to being the ones who attacked him, to "Well gee, guess we were wrong."

Either the police in Chicago are incompetent or they are purposefully keeping things confusing because they don't want to tip the suspects off that they know more than they are letting on.

[Androidpk]

:lol2:

[Fortybox]

:lol2:

https://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gifhttps://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gifhttps://i.imgur.com/iJq8Yo1.gif

[Tgo01]

Now police are confirming (as in this is an official statement and not just anonymous sources) that the two persons of interest they released earlier are the two people they saw on video.

So let's recap again:

Jussie Smollett says he was viciously beat by two people. Police say the entire area the alleged attack occurred is covered with surveillance cameras. They not only don't see evidence of the attack, but the only two people they see on video are the two people they just recently released from custody.

Where does this leave us? No video evidence of an attack and no video evidence of the alleged attackers, unless they just let them go because they want to gather more evidence first.

[Tgo01]

This latest bit of information from anonymous sources makes the whole fiasco with the persons of interest make sense.

Apparently police had evidence that the two persons of interest had purchased the rope found around Smollett's neck, which is why police decided to upgrade them from "persons of interest" to "suspects." After police told them about the evidence of purchasing the rope and the fact that they are the only two people seen on video around the area at the time of the attack the two were then arrested for battery, the two then caved and told the police Smollett had staged the attack and they are now cooperating with police, which is why they were let go.

Again this is just anonymous sources so far and nothing officially confirmed, but that sure as shit makes perfect sense given what we do know.

[Methais]

my anus ———>:lol2: <——- time4fun and her newest dildo

This is correct.

[Tgo01]

Still nothing official yet but even CNN is now reporting that police believe Smollett hired two people to stage the attack on himself.

Not looking good for Smollett at all. Or Androidpk for that matter, yet another hoax he fell for and somehow made him look even dumber in the process. How is this even possible anymore? How can Androidpk look even dumber than he already does?

[Androidpk]

Not looking good for me?? Jesus I want whatever it is that you're smoking.. :lol:

[Tgo01]

Not looking good for me?? Jesus I want whatever it is that you're smoking.. :lol:

Androidpk still holding out hope that Jussie Smollett isn't a lying sack of shit. I guess lying sacks of shit stick together.

[Androidpk]

Androidpk still holding out hope that Jussie Smollett isn't a lying sack of shit. I guess lying sacks of shit stick together.

If it turns out he staged a fake attack I'll have 0 problems saying he gets whatever comes his way. Stay super unhinged though tgo :lol:

[Tgo01]

It's official now; the police no longer consider Smollett to be a victim.

[Tgo01]

If it turns out he staged a fake attack I'll have 0 problems saying he gets whatever comes his way. Stay super unhinged though tgo :lol:

Isn’t that big of you? Fall for an obvious hoax AGAIN, blame it on Trump and his supporters, call everyone a racist for calling out this obvious hoax from the beginning, then when it turns out you’re wrong, AGAIN, just say “my bad” until the next manufactured outrage comes along.

Is it any wonder you are the most useless person alive? This is no longer my opinion, this is now a proven fact. Source? This thread.