:facepalm:
Right, because motivation, drive, the will to succeed, education and the will to learn more are never factors of successful people who get paid.
If success could be found in a bottle, everyone would have it.
And why do they get paid more than poor people?
(sorry to interrupt the populist robin hood circle jerk session)
![]()
It would be taxed.
And my post was merely pointing out a widely known fact.
Why you consider it a diss against the tools of motivation, determination, education, and a powerful will to succeed is beyond me. Obviously the wealthy drive the American economy, but let's not forget that the middle-class ride it just as hard.
Every time someone gets all up in arms about how the wealthy are being over-taxed and treated so unfairly I can't help but think of CEO compensation.
Your sister's HOT, but your Mom does that thing with her tongue.
I think I only included your post for context. It was not meant as a dis in as much as I am highlighting the fact that income is not the only difference in rich people and poor people.
And yes, I think some of the CEO compensation that is being paid out right now is stupid insane; however, the only way I know of to mitigate that from happening is to encourage more employee owned participation that way the share holders would be willing to reward the workers more than lumping it all in the pay of the CEO.
Then those same people supported the Bush tax policies via supporting him.
IMO Obama will probably cut defense also. Those who hold defense as a sacred cow may begin complaining now. The truth is that every administrative set has their sacred programs IMO, and none of them are good with money.
"We are the change that we've been screaming for."
- Strung Out, Mission Statement
If you receive rep signed -M, it's probably from me... or one of the other three people using the same signature. In the scheme of things though, do you really care?