Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 59

Thread: About those LA fires?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    8,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Low income housing is a necessity. Or have you not noticed the average price of homes lately? The prices in LA are most likely higher than average. Working people need places to live too.

    Also, those cash cards are privately funded.
    No it's not and certainly not at the expense of stealing the homes and property of tax paying citizens. A lot of those homes that were burned were family homes of working people and retired working people but you don't give a fuck about them because that doesn't play well with the Leftist message.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    7,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Low income housing is a necessity. Or have you not noticed the average price of homes lately? The prices in LA are most likely higher than average. Working people need places to live too.

    Also, those cash cards are privately funded.
    Right. I bet you are dumb enough to believe we can solve the homeless problem in America simply by building more houses and making them affordable. Of course you do.

    By privately funded you mean George Soros and other Democrat OSFs and government NPOs?

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Low income housing is a necessity. Or have you not noticed the average price of homes lately? The prices in LA are most likely higher than average. Working people need places to live too.

    Also, those cash cards are privately funded.
    Are you in favor of the city buying up these torched properties and making them into low income housing? Or should they just let the current owners rebuild without a ton of red tape?

    Which is better?
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    28,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    No it's not and certainly not at the expense of stealing the homes and property of tax paying citizens. A lot of those homes that were burned were family homes of working people and retired working people but you don't give a fuck about them because that doesn't play well with the Leftist message.
    No one is stealing property. You need to stop listening to the people who hate California, liberals, the left, and America. They're filling your mind with poison to turn you against your brothers and sisters. It's all coming down from the top. The billionaires want to fighting each other. They've got you convinced that it's the poorest, weakest, least threatening people on the planet who are your enemy. They do this so that you keep voting them in power so they can keep hoarding more and more for themselves.

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Right. I bet you are dumb enough to believe we can solve the homeless problem in America simply by building more houses and making them affordable. Of course you do.

    By privately funded you mean George Soros and other Democrat OSFs and government NPOs?
    Low income housing is important for society in many ways. Not only does it benefit low income individuals it benefits everyone else as well.

    Private money can be spent however they want to spend it. In this case it's going to people who need it the most. Why do you hate the poor?
    Last edited by Back; 07-16-2025 at 02:47 PM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    28,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    Are you in favor of the city buying up these torched properties and making them into low income housing? Or should they just let the current owners rebuild without a ton of red tape?

    Which is better?
    It's not an either or proposition. It's all up to the owners. Maybe they have the money to rebuild maybe they don't. If they do they have to go through the regulations for construction like everybody else. Those regulations are in place for many reasons including safety and impact on the environment/neighborhood.

    I know you're not asking these questions as any type of intellectual pursuit or constructive debate. You're just trying to set up got you questions. And you're not doing a good job of it.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    8,052

    Default

    So here is more of the details, this is purely a land grab by the Leftist government.


    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    7,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Low income housing is important for society in many ways. Not only does it benefit low income individuals it benefits everyone else as well.

    Private money can be spent however they want to spend it. In this case it's going to people who need it the most. Why do you hate the poor?
    Let’s get our definitions straight… Making housing affordable through the free market economy is indeed important to me. Less important, but nevertheless still available, is government subsidies for low income people to afford housing. Any working citizen can apply and receive federal housing subsidy benefits as long as they meet the basic eligibility requirements. So why is this necessary?

    I do not hate the poor. It does bother me that progressive commie NPOs are funding illegal immigrants that are trying to evade ICE & deportation. Why not instead take care of legal tax paying citizens that are in need? Karen Bass is doing all she can as mayor to impede the efforts of federal ICE enforcement, which is not her role as mayor.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    28,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    So here is more of the details, this is purely a land grab by the Leftist government.
    Your graphic is incorrect. The bill is actually SB 658.

    SB 663 extends property tax deadlines for rebuilding.

    I don't know where the info is coming from for whoever made that graphic but it seems to be totally incorrect. Just another lie to get you mad and keep voting for the elites.

  9. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    impact on the environment/neighborhood.
    lol

    The entire neighborhood burned to the ground, in large part because the government of California sucks at not turning California into a giant tinder box and because they couldn't keep enough water to fight the fires, but yeah sure, let's be sure we do an "environmental" impact study and make sure we aren't annoying our neighbor's lot filled with burned ruble.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    28,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Let’s get our definitions straight… Making housing affordable through the free market economy is indeed important to me. Less important, but nevertheless still available, is government subsidies for low income people to afford housing. Any working citizen can apply and receive federal housing subsidy benefits as long as they meet the basic eligibility requirements. So why is this necessary?

    I do not hate the poor. It does bother me that progressive commie NPOs are funding illegal immigrants that are trying to evade ICE & deportation. Why not instead take care of legal tax paying citizens that are in need? Karen Bass is doing all she can as mayor to impede the efforts of federal ICE enforcement, which is not her role as mayor.
    If Los Angeles buys property it can protect the neighborhood by what is built there. Rather than having billionaires snatch up all the properties for condos to rent out to the bourgeoisie who are chasing the American dream or high rent strip malls for dollar stores. What? You think Los Angeles City is buying these properties to turn a hearty profit?

    Legal citizens were being taken care of but now with the big bullshit bill vital medical and supplemental food services have been stripped from millions of them to add trillions to the debt and reward the few wealthy individuals who need help the least.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •