Things that made you Facepalm today (Political Version)

[~Rocktar~]

As horrible as is sounds, the white farmers need to leave, like they did in Zimbabwe and the nation needs to starve, like they did in Zimbabwe until they figured out they needed farmers that knew how to farm and learned to somewhat work together.

Both are proof that Republics/Democracies don't work with an ignorant populace.

[Methais]

You said, "The South African government isn't even trying to hide the fact that they are stealing land from white land owners."

Your initial statement quoted above was wrong for two reasons. First, the South African government denies that they are stealing land. So clearly, if the South African government is at fault, they are trying to hide it. Second, no land has been stolen, confiscated, expropriated or otherwise taken under the new law. The new law has not been used.




Your new statement is wrong because the law, which you can read for yourself here, does not condition expropriation on the race of the landowner.

I will not be at all surprised if South Africa implements the new law in a way that discriminates against white landowners. Contrary to your statements, however, they haven't done so yet.

Since whites in South Africa own 70% of the land and make up 7% of the population, it is very likely that the law, when implemented, will disproportionately affect white landowners. During Apartheid, land was legally stolen from blacks by whites. Few, if any, of the people who stole the land are alive today, and few, if any, of the victims are alive today. The question, then, is whether or not the heirs of the thieves should get to keep the land and the heirs of the victims should be denied the land. The new law is broadly worded, leaving great discretion to the government officials who will enforce it. It seems like it will be a difficult balancing act.

You're a fucking idiot. And a retard. And a piece of shit.

But anyway, the white farmers should just roll out of there and let the people starve to death.

And then ClydeR will make a new thread blaming the farmers for leaving and saying it's because they're racist, even if they're literally forced out or executed by the government, and call it genocide or something equally gay and stupid.

Then eventually his mommy will come into the room to change his diaper while his dad watches Chris Benoit matches.

[~Rocktar~]

You know, we have loads of smaller, family farms around the US shutting down because the kids don't want to take over the family farm. Food security is national security, I think that might be a great reason to fast track a lot of refugees and with a bit of grants, they could be up and farming here in short order. MAHA!

[Tgo01]

You said, "The South African government isn't even trying to hide the fact that they are stealing land from white land owners."

Your initial statement quoted above was wrong for two reasons. First, the South African government denies that they are stealing land. So clearly, if the South African government is at fault, they are trying to hide it. Second, no land has been stolen, confiscated, expropriated or otherwise taken under the new law. The new law has not been used.




Your new statement is wrong because the law, which you can read for yourself here, does not condition expropriation on the race of the landowner.

I will not be at all surprised if South Africa implements the new law in a way that discriminates against white landowners. Contrary to your statements, however, they haven't done so yet.

Since whites in South Africa own 70% of the land and make up 7% of the population, it is very likely that the law, when implemented, will disproportionately affect white landowners. During Apartheid, land was legally stolen from blacks by whites. Few, if any, of the people who stole the land are alive today, and few, if any, of the victims are alive today. The question, then, is whether or not the heirs of the thieves should get to keep the land and the heirs of the victims should be denied the land. The new law is broadly worded, leaving great discretion to the government officials who will enforce it. It seems like it will be a difficult balancing act.

Blah blah blah.

Simple question, Clyder: Is it wrong for a government to forcefully take the land of their own citizens based on the color of their skin? Just a simple yes or no answer is required.

[ClydeR]

Simple question, Clyder: Is it wrong for a government to forcefully take the land of their own citizens based on the color of their skin?

Of course it would not be right. I never said otherwise. You made multiple false statements about the South African law, and I posted corrections. Instead of raising straw men, you should acknowledge your errors.

[Tgo01]

Of course it would not be right. I never said otherwise. You made multiple false statements about the South African law

lol

Right. Right.

You: These racist whities are alleging their government is unjustly taking away their land!
Me: They ain't alleging shit, their government has literally said this is what is happening.
You: NUH-UH! It's not unjust because the government said they are only doing it if it's in the country's best interests and only under certain conditions!

Again, no one is falling for the far left's bullshit anymore. You can try to downplay what is going on all you want, but no one is falling for it anymore.

The South African government literally said this is what they are going to do. They have been saying they are going to go after white farm owners for many years now. Shit even the article YOU LINKED TO said this was all about white farm owners.

You really think anyone outside of your despicable bubble doesn't understand "country's best interest" and "under certain circumstances" is vague as fuck and can literally mean anything the government wants it to mean?

[Tgo01]

I just went back and read your post again. Is your argument really that they haven't taken any land YET? I mean sure, it's law. Sure, the South African government said they want to take away land from white people. Sure lawyers are suing to have this law removed because they say it unfairly targets white people. But the South African government hasn't taken away any land YET.

This is why people such as you are absolutely disgusting. Muddying the waters at every chance you get.

[Back]

Look, Clyder and Back and the rest of you fuckers.

Hey man I haven't said shit about this. You like to throw around a lot of grown up words for someone who acts like a 3 year old. Instead of being lazy by grouping everyone you think you disagree with into one big pot try to settle down and listen to each individual.

PS. Don't listen to the white replacement lie that the billionaire class likes to use to manipulate you. Its a myth designed to prey on your fears so that you will be obedient and keep you under their control.

[Parkbandit]

Hey man I haven't said shit about this. You like to throw around a lot of grown up words for someone who acts like a 3 year old. Instead of being lazy by grouping everyone you think you disagree with into one big pot try to settle down and listen to each individual.

PS. Don't listen to the white replacement lie that the billionaire class likes to use to manipulate you. Its a myth designed to prey on your fears so that you will be obedient and keep you under their control.

Why do you believe that the Biden Administration allowed millions and millions into the US illegally?

[Back]

Why do you believe that the Biden Administration allowed millions and millions into the US illegally?

WOOOOOOW!!! Please please please tell me you don't really believe that bullshit bro! Please?