Page 46 of 47 FirstFirst ... 3644454647 LastLast
Results 451 to 460 of 464

Thread: Tyranny of the ATF

  1. #451
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,304

    Default

    Just in case anyone needs even more evidence that the ATF is a tyrannical rogue federal agency that should be abolished:

    ATF accused of altering DEI official's job title to skirt Trump ban
    https://news3lv.com/news/nation-worl...and-explosives

  2. #452

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Just in case anyone needs even more evidence that the ATF is a tyrannical rogue federal agency that should be abolished:

    ATF accused of altering DEI official's job title to skirt Trump ban
    https://news3lv.com/news/nation-worl...and-explosives



    I hope whoever's idea that was is also shit canned.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  3. #453
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,416
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Just in case anyone needs even more evidence that the ATF is a tyrannical rogue federal agency that should be abolished:

    ATF accused of altering DEI official's job title to skirt Trump ban
    https://news3lv.com/news/nation-worl...and-explosives
    I'm jsut unsure if she was hired prior to that and they promoted her to it within or if she was hired directly into that. If the former, I don't see the issue.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  4. #454
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    I'm jsut unsure if she was hired prior to that and they promoted her to it within or if she was hired directly into that. If the former, I don't see the issue.
    Her title was changed from chief diversity officer to senior executive just after Trump ordered all federal DEI staff be immediately placed on administrative leave. You think that’s just a mere coincidence?

    I say Trump should fire her ass immediately along with anyone else identified that had a part in this insubordination, but at minimum Congress should investigate & subpoena Ms. Boykin & other ATF leaders to testify.
    Last edited by Suppressed Poet; 01-25-2025 at 04:56 PM.

  5. #455
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,416
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Her title was changed from chief diversity officer to senior executive just after Trump ordered all federal DEI staff be immediately placed on administrative leave. You think that’s just a mere coincidence?

    I say Trump should fire her ass immediately along with anyone else identified that had a part in this insubordination, but at minimum Congress should investigate & subpoena Ms. Boykin & other ATF leaders to testify.
    Yes, I understand that, because the position was eliminated. If she was an employee prior to the position being created and promoted/moved into the position, and then the position was eliminated so she was move out of it, it makes sense. This is different than if she was hired into the agency purely to fill that position.

    They created the position because the prior administration told them to. They got rid of it because this administration told them to.
    Last edited by Gelston; 01-25-2025 at 05:20 PM.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  6. #456
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    7,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Just in case anyone needs even more evidence that the ATF is a tyrannical rogue federal agency that should be abolished:

    ATF accused of altering DEI official's job title to skirt Trump ban
    https://news3lv.com/news/nation-worl...and-explosives
    In reality, every single top level official there that can be fired should be fired. Every one, without fail. They have knowingly and willingly violated the law, danced around semantics to avoid following the law and court orders and made every excuse in the book. They all need to go.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  7. #457
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Yes, I understand that, because the position was eliminated. If she was an employee prior to the position being created and promoted/moved into the position, and then the position was eliminated so she was move out of it, it makes sense. This is different than if she was hired into the agency purely to fill that position.

    They created the position because the prior administration told them to. They got rid of it because this administration told them to.
    So we’re on the same page, you are saying that it’s likely the agency just created another position (either before or after Trump assumed office & gave the DEI order) and hired this lady into that role after announcing that DEI staff positions be ordered on administrative leave? I find that both unlikely and problematic. So the agency just suddenly found themselves in need of a separate senior leadership position, created the requisition, interviewed multiple candidates, found that their former chief diversity officer was the best qualified person for this new role, hired her into the position, and then changed her title after Trump gave the DEI order? I smell bullshit.

    The most obvious assessment is the agency simply changed her job title to protect her from administrative leave. I suspect that she is still performing the same DEI functions she was previously hired to do. Again though, Trump’s team can quickly find out internally to eliminate any doubt or Congress could publicly investigate & compel her and others to testify. I’m good with either.

  8. #458
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    In reality, every single top level official there that can be fired should be fired. Every one, without fail. They have knowingly and willingly violated the law, danced around semantics to avoid following the law and court orders and made every excuse in the book. They all need to go.
    I advocate for both the repeal of the NFA and abolishment of the ATF.

    If the ATF were chiefly focused on making sure firearms were not in the hands of dangerous criminals I’d be all for it. Instead they choose to harass and prosecute otherwise law abiding citizens on stupid rules they frequently change based upon their current interpretation of the NFA and existing law. They have a well documented history of not being transparent with the public, unnecessary and extreme measures of enforcement that result in death & destruction, not abiding to court orders, and that’s only scratching the surface. The entire agency is beyond reform.
    Last edited by Suppressed Poet; 01-25-2025 at 07:05 PM.

  9. #459
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    7,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    I advocate for both the repeal of the NFA and abolishment of the ATF.

    If the ATF were chiefly focused on making sure firearms were not in the hands of dangerous criminals I’d be all for it. Instead they choose to harass and prosecute otherwise law abiding citizens on stupid rules they frequently change based upon their current interpretation of the NFA and existing law. They have a well documented history of not being transparent with the public, unnecessary and extreme measures of enforcement that result in death & destruction, not abiding to court orders, and that’s only scratching the surface. The entire agency is beyond reform.
    I could agree with that. Add repeal of the Gun Control Act, The Brady Act and PLCAA and Child Safety Lock Act among others. Scrap the whole mess. I don't even know what they do with the Tobacco and Alcohol part other than enforce tax stamps. That is easily done with other departments.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  10. #460
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,416
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    So we’re on the same page, you are saying that it’s likely the agency just created another position (either before or after Trump assumed office & gave the DEI order) and hired this lady into that role after announcing that DEI staff positions be ordered on administrative leave? I find that both unlikely and problematic. So the agency just suddenly found themselves in need of a separate senior leadership position, created the requisition, interviewed multiple candidates, found that their former chief diversity officer was the best qualified person for this new role, hired her into the position, and then changed her title after Trump gave the DEI order? I smell bullshit.

    The most obvious assessment is the agency simply changed her job title to protect her from administrative leave. I suspect that she is still performing the same DEI functions she was previously hired to do. Again though, Trump’s team can quickly find out internally to eliminate any doubt or Congress could publicly investigate & compel her and others to testify. I’m good with either.
    I'm not saying the did or didn't I don't know and you don't know. My question is on if the woman ALREADY WORKED at the ATF BEFORE the DEI position was created. If so, then I have no problem with her being moved back to her old job.

    I think it would be completely shitty to fire a woman from a job that she has been at for 10 or 20 years because she had to fill a position that was mandated by the prior admin. If she was simply hired in specifically for that position, then no, she shouldn't get any special treatment.
    Last edited by Gelston; 01-26-2025 at 07:03 PM.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •