Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 60 of 60

Thread: Day One

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,435
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    I won’t disagree that added language would not help clarify, but that was not even a thought in 1791. The arms the people possessed were the same technology level as the military.

    But I digress…respectfully, answer my question about if you believe the author(s) of the 14th amendment intended for those protections to apply to the children of foreign nationals that entered our country illegally of their own free will.
    I believe I've already made it clear that they wrote the Amendment a specific way, yes.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  2. #52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    Yes, that is an exact and concise statement of what the Trump administration will argue.

    Most, if not all, states have laws that require all parents, including those here illegally, to send their children to school. If they don't, the government can force the children to attend school. Both the parent and the child can face legal consequences for truancy. The children are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. That is true regardless of whether or not the child is born in the U.S. Being born in the U.S., though, affects citizenship.

    A diplomat, on the other hand, is a different matter. As we all know from Law and Order, diplomats and their children are not subject to U.S. criminal laws. If a diplomat or the diplomat's child commits a crime in the U.S., they will have to be prosecuted, if at all, in their home country.

    Trump violated his oath -- on the same day he swore it -- by signing an executive order that he knew was unconstitutional. A normal person who did that would feel shame.
    You talking shit about how literally anyone else on the planet should feel shame is funny as fuck, because just look at you.



    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Last edited by Methais; 01-22-2025 at 12:13 PM.
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  3. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    I believe I've already made it clear that they wrote the Amendment a specific way, yes.
    Ok, fair enough. I’m skeptical that was their intent, but it’s hard to overcome it written as “all persons”.

    Appreciate the dialogue & your insights. I’ll let this go now.
    Last edited by Suppressed Poet; 01-22-2025 at 12:24 PM.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    7,567

    Default

    This was an interesting tidbit.

    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,435
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    This was an interesting tidbit.

    Then he should have written the Amendment to include that.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    7,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Then he should have written the Amendment to include that.
    English was different back then and people weren't nearly as fucking retarded.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,435
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    English was different back then and people weren't nearly as fucking retarded.
    Funny, they were awfully specific and concise in the other sections about who was and wasn't included. Did they just decide to not be in the section concerning citizenship for no reason at all?

    Or perhaps it is because that was his opinion, but he wasn't the only one authoring it. He might not have wanted that, but perhaps the majority did.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  8. #58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    He called them “presidential memorandum” which is simply EO by another name. When you include those, the number is much higher.

    Your attempts to rewrite history for your narrative have failed.
    As you attempt to rewrite constitutional amendment based on what you feel the authors actually meant.

    Both of you are heavily showing your ignorance.

    Sent from my motorola one 5G ace using Tapatalk
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  9. #59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    As you attempt to rewrite constitutional amendment based on what you feel the authors actually meant.

    Both of you are heavily showing your ignorance.
    That's literally what the courts do.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    As you attempt to rewrite constitutional amendment based on what you feel the authors actually meant.

    Both of you are heavily showing your ignorance.

    Sent from my motorola one 5G ace using Tapatalk
    The judicial branch has the final say to interpret the Constitution. Legal challenges happen on both sides of the political spectrum. SCOTUS believes it is important to consider the language and meaning at the time it was written, and that makes sense to me. My guess is Trump’s take on birth right citizenship and jurisdiction will not be interpreted favorably for him by SCOTUS, but it’s also not absurd to question if the 14th amendment (which was very obviously intended for emancipated slaves & their children) was ever intended to be applied to illegal aliens & their children in the way it does today.

    Also…nice to hear from you again.
    Last edited by Suppressed Poet; 01-29-2025 at 06:50 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •