Last edited by Methais; 01-22-2025 at 12:13 PM.
This was an interesting tidbit.
I asked for neither your Opinion,
your Acceptance
nor your Permission.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
"It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie
I asked for neither your Opinion,
your Acceptance
nor your Permission.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
"It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie
Funny, they were awfully specific and concise in the other sections about who was and wasn't included. Did they just decide to not be in the section concerning citizenship for no reason at all?
Or perhaps it is because that was his opinion, but he wasn't the only one authoring it. He might not have wanted that, but perhaps the majority did.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
The judicial branch has the final say to interpret the Constitution. Legal challenges happen on both sides of the political spectrum. SCOTUS believes it is important to consider the language and meaning at the time it was written, and that makes sense to me. My guess is Trump’s take on birth right citizenship and jurisdiction will not be interpreted favorably for him by SCOTUS, but it’s also not absurd to question if the 14th amendment (which was very obviously intended for emancipated slaves & their children) was ever intended to be applied to illegal aliens & their children in the way it does today.
Also…nice to hear from you again.
Last edited by Suppressed Poet; 01-29-2025 at 06:50 PM.