Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[ClydeR]

How many primaries did Kamala win in the last two election cycles?

You're changing the time period! You initially said Harris has never won a primary when her name was on the ballot, which is untrue.

It would be like if somebody claimed Trump had never been convicted of a crime. That statement could be made true by restricting the time period to "in the past three months."

Or if someone said Trump's business has not been found guilty of tax fraud. That statement could be made true by restricting it to "in the past two years."

Or if someone said Trump has never been in charge of a charity that was barred from existing because it spent charitable funds for Trump's personal benefit. That statement could be made true by restricting it to "in the past four years."

Or if someone said Trump's campaign chiefs have never been sent to prison. That statement could be made true by adding "except for two of them."

[Suppressed Poet]

You're changing the time period! You initially said Harris has never won a primary when her name was on the ballot, which is untrue.

It would be like if somebody claimed Trump had never been convicted of a crime. That statement could be made true by restricting the time period to "in the past three months."

Or if someone said Trump's business has not been found guilty of tax fraud. That statement could be made true by restricting it to "in the past two years."

Or if someone said Trump has never been in charge of a charity that was barred from existing because it spent charitable funds for Trump's personal benefit. That statement could be made true by restricting it to "in the past four years."

Or if someone said Trump's campaign chiefs have never been sent to prison. That statement could be made true by adding "except for two of them."

Kamala Harris has never received a single vote of the people in any national Democrat primary election.

Do you agree that revised statement is true?

[Neveragain]

You're changing the time period! You initially said Harris has never won a primary when her name was on the ballot, which is untrue.

It would be like if somebody claimed Trump had never been convicted of a crime. That statement could be made true by restricting the time period to "in the past three months."

Or if someone said Trump's business has not been found guilty of tax fraud. That statement could be made true by restricting it to "in the past two years."

Or if someone said Trump has never been in charge of a charity that was barred from existing because it spent charitable funds for Trump's personal benefit. That statement could be made true by restricting it to "in the past four years."

Or if someone said Trump's campaign chiefs have never been sent to prison. That statement could be made true by adding "except for two of them."

I assumed you weren't retarded and knew what a primary was.

My bad, I will from hence forth just assume you are retarded and work from there.

[ClydeR]

Kamala Harris has never received a single vote of the people in any national Democrat primary election.

Do you agree that revised statement is true?

No, I would not agree with that statement because is demonstrably false. Harris received votes in the 2020 primary even though she withdrew before voting began. She received votes because her name was still on the ballot. Why would somebody vote for somebody who has withdrawn? I don't know. We could ask RFK, Jr.

[ClydeR]

She didn’t answer any questions, blamed Trump for all of the problems during her time as VP of the current administration, and appear flustered & angry.

Exactly! It was a good interview.

[Solkern]

“I think she had a mission that she wanted to do,” Baier said after the interview. “Maybe she wanted to have a viral moment or pushback. She came to Fox News and she wanted to have a go-after-Donald-Trump viral moment that plays on a lot of other channels and on social media. She may have gotten that.”

Even Baier thinks Kamala did good at the interview.

https://www.nj.com/politics/2024/10/...a-mission.html

[Tgo01]

Even Baier thinks Kamala did good at the interview.

That's what you took away from that quote?

Holy shit, there isn't an emoji accurate enough to portray how hard I am laughing at what a clown you are.

Leave the too-dumb-to-be-real takes to Seran please.

[Neveragain]

“I think she had a mission that she wanted to do,” Baier said after the interview. “Maybe she wanted to have a viral moment or pushback. She came to Fox News and she wanted to have a go-after-Donald-Trump viral moment that plays on a lot of other channels and on social media. She may have gotten that.”

Even Baier thinks Kamala did good at the interview.

https://www.nj.com/politics/2024/10/...a-mission.html

What did YOU think?

Are you incapable of thinking for yourself?

[Neveragain]

No, I would not agree with that statement because is demonstrably false. Harris received votes in the 2020 primary even though she withdrew before voting began. She received votes because her name was still on the ballot. Why would somebody vote for somebody who has withdrawn? I don't know. We could ask RFK, Jr.

So, Kamala has never won a single primary, like I said?

[ClydeR]

So, Kamala has never won a single primary, like I said?

Unlike you said, Harris has won a primary. It was one of the obstacles she had to overcome to be elected Attorney General of California.