You're a mind reader now?
I've not seen any reason to think that failure to achieve a 100% response rate makes the reported crime rates inaccurate. To emphasize, the report is about crime rates. In most statistical measures based on voluntary responses, a 60% response rate is considered adequate to project conclusions about the entire population.
Some localities have difficulty complying with the NIBRS electronic reporting format. Some of those localities are large cities, but the compliance problem is mostly with small police departments.
The cities of New York and Los Angeles have independently reported decreases in violent crime in 2023.
You are arguing for what you want -- increasing violent crime rates -- instead of what exists in reality.
I should never have assumed you would be smart enough to let your retarded thread just die without quadrupling down on your original stupidity.
I just assumed you can't possibly be as dumb as sErAn and you were like "Mama, hold my cold cuts you had to go get for me.. I'm going in for another shot!"
I apologize for that assumption. It's my fault because I should have known better than to question the level of your retardation.
Y’all remember when Andrew Cuomo falsified and manipulated Covid death data to cover up his retarded policies that caused the accidental deaths of elderly people in nursing homes? Remember idiots like Seran and ClydeR reoeating the mainstream media narrative for them and telling us to trust the science? That’s exactly what they are doing here with crime, because they don’t want people to see the obvious chaos that comes with defunding police, decriminalization of retail theft, and so-called bail reform.