Tyranny of the ATF

[Parkbandit]

No? Almost a hundred years passed between the writing of the Second Amendment and the South rising in rebellion, not sure why you think the 2nd Amendment had anything to do with it. Doesn't exactly address Trump trying to pull a Jefferson Davis either.

Lexington and Concord were battles in the Civil War?

Good to know.......................

I'm going to rate your post on our scale an 8.

You've said way more seran things.

[Seran]

I didn’t say anything about the American Civil War. I was referring to the American Revolutionary War. You know…the one the one we fought against King George III & the British?

Please do yourself a favor. Google Lexington & Concord. Read about what happened there and the events that led up to that battle. Hopefully you can then understand just a little bit of historical context for why our founders thought it’s important for the people, not government, to have access to firearms.

As to the nonsense you said about comparing Donald Trump & Jefferson Davis (who was a Democrat I may add), I’ll say to you what Trump tweeted (X’d?) on J6: Go home with love & in peace.

You seem to be pretty hip on slaughtering history there. The Second Amendment argument has nothing to do without the Revolutionary War, nor does stopping psychotic people from continuing the possess firearms have any impact on our country's ability to defend itself from foreign threats as your side seems to imply.

[Parkbandit]

You seem to be pretty hip on slaughtering history there. The Second Amendment argument has nothing to do without the Revolutionary War, nor does stopping psychotic people from continuing the possess firearms have any impact on our country's ability to defend itself from foreign threats as your side seems to imply.

9

I literally cannot glean any intelligent thought in your post.. or what you were trying to say.

[Methais]

You seem to be pretty hip on slaughtering history there. The Second Amendment argument has nothing to do without the Revolutionary War, nor does stopping psychotic people from continuing the possess firearms have any impact on our country's ability to defend itself from foreign threats as your side seems to imply.

[Suppressed Poet]

You seem to be pretty hip on slaughtering history there. The Second Amendment argument has nothing to do without the Revolutionary War, nor does stopping psychotic people from continuing the possess firearms have any impact on our country's ability to defend itself from foreign threats as your side seems to imply.

Yeah I’m with PB & Methais in having a difficult time translating your retard speak.

The Second Amendment argument has nothing to do without the Revolutionary War

Give us clarification on this double negative. Are you saying the purpose of the Second Amendment had nothing to do with the founders’ experience from the Revolutionary War?

You didn’t read about Concord & Lexington, did you? I’ll summarize it for you. The very first thing the British tried to do in order to quell the rebellion is to seize control of all the firearms from the colonists. Kinda makes sense when you rub your two brain cells to think about it… It would have been impossible for the USA to exist & fight a war of independence against a tyrannical government (Great Britain) without guns.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

You didn’t read about Concord & Lexington, did you? I’ll summarize it for you.

ChatGPT says the two are "the birthplaces of American liberty." So many tools to make your life easier, and Seracist chooses to watch Fox.

[Seran]

Yeah I’m with PB & Methais in having a difficult time translating your retard speak.



Give us clarification on this double negative. Are you saying the purpose of the Second Amendment had nothing to do with the founders’ experience from the Revolutionary War?

You didn’t read about Concord & Lexington, did you? I’ll summarize it for you. The very first thing the British tried to do in order to quell the rebellion is to seize control of all the firearms from the colonists. Kinda makes sense when you rub your two brain cells to think about it… It would have been impossible for the USA to exist & fight a war of independence against a tyrannical government (Great Britain) without guns.

Basic causality seems to escape your ability to wrap your head around the subject. Do you have anything backing up your claim that the signatories of the Constitution wrote the Second Amendment due to what happened in the last few example you listed? I presume you're extrapolating without evidence as usual.

[Arqueto]

Basic causality seems to escape your ability to wrap your head around the subject. Do you have anything backing up your claim that the signatories of the Constitution wrote the Second Amendment due to what happened in the last few example you listed? I presume you're extrapolating without evidence as usual.

1000% a bot.

[Suppressed Poet]

Basic causality seems to escape your ability to wrap your head around the subject. Do you have anything backing up your claim that the signatories of the Constitution wrote the Second Amendment due to what happened in the last few example you listed? I presume you're extrapolating without evidence as usual.

Sure. There is plenty of evidence on that topic, but probably the best is from Alexander Hamilton. He wrote this in Federalist papers which predates the Bill of Rights:

It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

And also:

If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.

[Parkbandit]

1000% a bot.

So... that whole "ZOMG AI WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH THEIR SUPER INTELLECT" is a complete lie?

Because Seranbot is retarded af.