We shall see. I would be amused if Justice Thomas goes into another tirade that any constitution provision or amendment is limited to circumstances at the time of writing, particularly on the Rahimi matter who is arguing his right to threaten his former lovers with being shot to death shall not be infringed by taking away his guns. Mr Thomas probably thinks the government had no rights to protect women as Mr Rahimi alleges, because they were little more than possessions or chattal when the Constitution was drafted.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.
"Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
-Superracist, Joe Biden
“If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
-My favorite liberal
Trump was the one who gave the EO and directed the ATF on the bump stock ban, which I have been consistently critical of. I thought you would be happy if it’s struck down? Justice Thomas wouldn’t have to specify Bruen standard if morons like you simply understood what “shall not be infringed” means.
Well regulated..
Last edited by Parkbandit; 11-07-2023 at 07:37 AM.