Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
You didn’t say registry of arms dealers. You said registry of arms sales.

Regarding the illegality of the ATF changing the definition of a dealer & making a new rule:

1) Bruen vs NY State Pistol Association: This restriction does not meet the standard of having the history, text, or tradition at the time the Bill of Rights was ratified.

2) Sackett vs EPA: This decision effectively ended the reliance of chevron deference doctrine that bureaucratic agencies can make up their own interpretation of the law & implement their own rules. The courts have the ultimate authority to interpret laws written by Congress, not the ATF.

We’ll see it play out in the courts. It just takes time.
You're now arguing that because two other unrelated rulings, one on concealed and carry, the other unrelated to firearms whatsoever is the basis that ATF requiring additional dealer registration is unconstitutional? That's a stretch, but as you pointed out we'll see how that argument plays out if it is actually heard before the Court with that justification.