Quote Originally Posted by Seran View Post
Now you're just splitting hairs. Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'. That the sentence concludes with 'shall not be infringed' doesn't negate the fact the Framers intended for the federal government to regulate firearms. I'm sure someone else will agree with your argument about undue burden and take it to Court, however I don't see it being overridden on any constitutional merit.
New York State Rifle and Pistol Association vs Bruen, 2020

Per the decision, laws restricting firearms ownership must meet the "text, history, and tradition" measure. So, show me the text, history and tradition of banning firearms based on the decision of an unelected official with no text of law authorizing such ban. Despite there not being a text, history or tradition of bans at all to support the constitutionality of any such ban in the first place.

Fuck off retard.