Justice for Hire - SCOTUS

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Only if you're adding amendments which state an embryo has more rights to a womb than the woman whose anatomy is being usurped by an unwanted collection of cells. But I think you're confusing the text of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, a common enough mistake for the uneducated.

The statement contains a disrespectful and derogatory remark about the person being addressed, suggesting that they are uneducated for potentially confusing two important documents. It also implies a strong opinion on a controversial issue without providing any evidence or reasoning to support that opinion.

[Parkbandit]

Mystifying how the far right on this forum have forgotten their social studies lessons and decided our Representative Democracy has to be called something else because we have a Constitution. As of they are mutually exclusive, instead of being mutually inclusive as designed by by the Framers. James Madison and the other social elites were terrified of the idea of the lower class gaining a majority, while at the same time recognized the inherit flaws of the monarchy and aristocracies where so many of our citizens migrated out from under. Hence came the Constitution, which is a statement of unalienable rights, while also being a living document guiding the framework of the United States.

The only part of our federal government that is a real Representative Democracy is the House of Representatives.

The Senate is not.

The Presidency is not.

The SCOTUS is not.

[Seran]

The only part of our federal government that is a real Representative Democracy is the House of Representatives.

The Senate is not.

The Presidency is not.

The SCOTUS is not.

Umm.. wow. Members of Congress and the President are officials elected through direct democratic elections exercising the will of the people as their representatives. Meanwhile, a Supreme Court Justice is a direct appointee of the democratically elected President and confirmed by the Senate. Meanwhile, members of Congress can be recalled by their home state's for failure to exercise the will of the people, while both the President and Supreme Court Justices may be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors by.. wait for it, articles of impeachment drafted by the House!

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Umm.. wow. Members of Congress and the President are officials elected through direct democratic elections exercising the will of the people as their representatives. Meanwhile, a Supreme Court Justice is a direct appointee of the democratically elected President and confirmed by the Senate. Meanwhile, members of Congress can be recalled by their home state's for failure to exercise the will of the people, while both the President and Supreme Court Justices may be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors by.. wait for it, articles of impeachment drafted by the House!

The statement contains a few inaccuracies:


- Supreme Court Justices are not direct appointees of the President. The President nominates them, but they must be confirmed by the Senate.
- Members of Congress cannot be recalled by their home state, at least not under federal law. Some states have recall provisions for state officials, but not for federal officials.
- While it is true that both the President and Supreme Court Justices can be impeached, the process for each is different. The House of Representatives drafts articles of impeachment for both, but only the Senate can hold a trial and remove the President from office. For Supreme Court Justices, the Senate serves as both judge and jury.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Seran, my dude. It's so easy to just paste your word salad into chatGPT and it'll help correct all your retarded "thoughts".

[Neveragain]

Only if you're adding amendments which state an embryo has more rights to a womb than the woman whose anatomy is being usurped by an unwanted collection of cells. But I think you're confusing the text of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, a common enough mistake for the uneducated.

You have a real hard time with science.

Can't have a "mass of cells" if it's not life. It's no other life than human life, thus, that human life has a right to life that is protected under the constitution.

Only really dumb, selfish and evil people believe otherwise and should be removed from humanity, just like the slave owners.

[Parkbandit]

Umm.. wow. Members of Congress and the President are officials elected through direct democratic elections exercising the will of the people as their representatives. Meanwhile, a Supreme Court Justice is a direct appointee of the democratically elected President and confirmed by the Senate. Meanwhile, members of Congress can be recalled by their home state's for failure to exercise the will of the people, while both the President and Supreme Court Justices may be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors by.. wait for it, articles of impeachment drafted by the House!

If the Senate were a true representation of the population of every state, then California would have more than Wyoming. They both have 2.

If the President was a true representation of the population of every state, then there would be no Electoral Collage.

If the SCOTUS was a true representation of the population of every state, they would be elected BY the people of the states, not nominated by the President who is elected by the Electoral College and voted on by the Senate.

Please stop being retarded to just be retarded in every fucking post you make.

[Seran]

If the Senate were a true representation of the population of every state, then California would have more than Wyoming. They both have 2.

If the President was a true representation of the population of every state, then there would be no Electoral Collage.

If the SCOTUS was a true representation of the population of every state, they would be elected BY the people of the states, not nominated by the President who is elected by the Electoral College and voted on by the Senate.

Please stop being retarded to just be retarded in every fucking post you make.

What's particularly retarded about your statement is you falsely assume Representation is equal. What part of the Constitution outlining the number of representatives confuses you? What part of the electoral college stymies your ability to understand that states do not have equal voices in either? Do you not understand anything about the House of Representatives? The structure of the House and Senate are /completely/ different and yet the methodology to be elected is the same. Winning at the ballot of their district or state through a democratic election. That's how a democracy works bro, if you don't understand the differences then you really ought to bow out of the conversation.

[Parkbandit]

What's particularly retarded about your statement is you falsely assume Representation is equal. What part of the Constitution outlining the number of representatives confuses you? What part of the electoral college stymies your ability to understand that states do not have equal voices in either? Do you not understand anything about the House of Representatives? The structure of the House and Senate are /completely/ different and yet the methodology to be elected is the same. Winning at the ballot of their district or state through a democratic election. That's how a democracy works bro, if you don't understand the differences then you really ought to bow out of the conversation.

Clue#1: You keep referring back to this thing called the Constitution.
Clue #2: When you first suggested that the US is a Representative Democracy, you used the House of Representatives as an example. It only worked for the House of Representatives.
Clue #3: I gave you the definitions of Representative Democracy and a Republic.

Let's ask ChatGPT:

If I had to choose between the two, I would say that the United States is a republic. While it is true that the United States is a representative democracy, the term "republic" more accurately describes the United States' form of government.In a republic, power is held by the people or their elected representatives, rather than by a monarch or other hereditary ruler. The United States operates as a federal republic, with power divided between the federal government and the individual states. The Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances, in which the three branches of government - the legislative, executive, and judicial - have separate powers and responsibilities.
While the United States is also a representative democracy, this term does not fully capture the complexities of the country's government structure. The term "republic" emphasizes the importance of a written constitution, the rule of law, and the role of elected representatives in governing the country.

Now, I can either believe you.. someone who is never correct about anything.. or I can believe an artificial intelligence program.

I'm going with the one who is not the reigning Retard Champion.

Sorry.

[Seran]

It's alright PB, I accept your defeat no matter how in graciously you depart the conversation. Maybe one day you can repeat a social studies course, learn the definition of democracy and come to understand we vote in elections in this country. Idiot