Quote Originally Posted by Seran View Post
Two liberal justices received gifts and travel and disclosed it. This is following federal law.
Why does Seran keep repeating this lie that the Democrat justices disclosed all of this information? Certainly not in the article I linked and I haven't seen a link from here suggesting what he is lying about here.

Also notice how his stance has changed from "OMG! Received gifts from a friend! BRIBERY! JUSTICES FOR HIRE!!!!"

But as soon as it comes out that the Democrat justices have also received lavish gifts (well it didn't "just come out", this has been known for a while, but I digress) suddenly it's "It's okay that justices receive lavish gifts! Just as long as they follow the law and disclose them!"

But here is the other lie Seran is omitting (I have to use that word now since Seran apparently didn't know what it meant until I told him in my last post); justices aren't required to disclose vacations and lodging from friends, which was the biggest "Gotcha!" the Democrats thought they had on Thomas.