http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.
"Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
-Superracist, Joe Biden
“If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
-My favorite liberal
You mean like this? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rd/1453524002/
or this?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...482_story.html
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.
"Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
-Superracist, Joe Biden
“If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
-My favorite liberal
Last edited by Parkbandit; 03-09-2023 at 10:54 AM.
Seran & Whoopi: That pesky 1st Amendment is getting in the way of the government shutting down Foxy Nudes! Rights for me but not for thee!!
https://www.dailywire.com/news/whoop...-people-to-lie
Whoopi Goldberg claimed on Wednesday that the First Amendment did not allow people to “willingly lie” — and argued that Fox News, after airing never-before-seen footage from January 6th, was “recruiting domestic terrorists.”
Goldberg made the comments during Wednesday’s broadcast of her ABC midday talk show — “The View” — and she argued that it “should be against the law” for Fox News host Tucker Carlson to have access to and the ability to air footage that the January 6th Committee had opted not to show the American people.
“I have a question, I have a question,” Goldberg began, referencing the newly-released footage. “How come this is not thought of as being recruiting? How come they’re not thinking about this as … radicalizing — why is this not being scrutinized the way they scrutinize other things, because to me, this is — this should be against the law.”
“You should not be able to lie to the American [people] — knowingly,” Goldberg continued. “You know, it’s one thing if you made a mistake and you didn’t know, but we heard for five or six years how, you know, the media was a lying sack of doo, they were ‘fake news’ … so how come — what is our — what do we do as Americans to say this is not okay?”
Cohost Sara Haines interrupted, pointing out the fact that people who disagreed with her had a First Amendment right to say so — but Goldberg quickly shot her down.
“The First Amendment doesn’t allow you to willingly lie,” Goldberg asserted, despite volumes of case law that suggest otherwise in all but a few very specific cases.
Goldberg claimed on Tuesday’s show that Americans should believe their eyes and ears when watching footage released the day of the January 6th riot on Capitol Hill — and the footage that was edited, produced, and released by the January 6th Committee — but suggested that the footage aired by Carlson should be held to a different standard.
Taking a turn as Shaps masquerading someone's subjective opinion as the opinion of an entire party? News outlets are free to post whatever they want, however if it's slanderous or libel proven to be such, then without a retraction they're exposed to massive civil liability. See Dominion Voting v Faux Newds where their lies regarding the 2020 elections versus their exposed knowledge of it's slanderous nature is the basis of a billion dollar suit.
You know what? That is a fair criticism and I shouldn’t assume that is your opinion. I just know how you hate Faulks Noods, seem to often share the same view as The View, and thought you would support government shutting it down. Yes slander and libel is a civil suit. See also Nick Sandmann vs CNN.
However, didn’t you just summarize the stance of all Republicans supporting child indentured servitude and a bunch of other nonsense?
Last edited by Suppressed Poet; 03-10-2023 at 12:26 PM.