Things that you have taken seriously today (Political version)

[Seran]

If they are "naturally exempt" then why set the threshold to 600 dollars?.

No idea why they set it at $600, it could have been $500 or $750. The important thing is that by reporting aggregate transactions exceeding the $600 they will be catching a lot more fraudsters.

One day you'll see your party is trying to destroy our country

[Tgo01]

The important thing is that by reporting aggregate transactions exceeding the $600 they will be catching a lot more fraudsters.

Democrats: We need to spy on everyone in order to catch the tax cheats!
Seran: DDDUUUUURRRRRR! Makes complete sense to me!

Up next:

Democrats: We need to install cameras in every house in order to catch the domestic abusers!
Seran: DDDUUUUURRRRRR! Makes complete sense to me!

[Neveragain]

Democrats: We need to spy on everyone in order to catch the tax cheats!
Seran: DDDUUUUURRRRRR! Makes complete sense to me!

Up next:

Democrats: We need to install cameras in every house in order to catch the domestic abusers!
Seran: DDDUUUUURRRRRR! Makes complete sense to me!

Seran doesn't realize that this will just cause a giant run on the banks.

In before "we'll just lock their accounts ~ Seran"

[Shaps]

Judge for yourself:

https://www.judicialwatch.org/videos...-fetal-tissue/

"FITTON: DOCUMENTS SHOW OBAMA FDA BUYING FETAL HEADS 'FRESH, NEVER FROZEN'"

https://www.yahoo.com/now/conservati...215100944.html

"A January 2013 invoice priced the bodies of unborn babies at $215 for the second trimester and $515 for the first trimester."

https://www.wicker.senate.gov/public...0-0894A476FFF1

"The 2019 restrictions on HFT were instituted because of glaring abuses that came to light. For example, a careful review of an FDA contract with Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR) to procure “fresh human fetal tissue” for transplantation into mice raised serious doubts about whether federal standards were being met, resulting in HHS’s decision to cancel the contract. Further investigations and disclosures led HHS to discontinue intramural research projects that exploited the remains of unborn children and to convene the statutorily-defined Ethics Advisory Board to provide oversight and accountability for extramural HFT projects.

Recently published FOIA documents have brought to light sickening details of the FDA’s dealings with ABR before 2018, in which FDA employees routinely placed orders for eyeballs, livers, skin, brains, skulls, and sometimes fully-intact bodies of infants aborted in the second trimester. According to email and court records, ABR received up to $2,000 for whole infant bodies and was paid $12,000 for a series of shipments of harvested organs that were used to humanize mice in lab experiments. More recently, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) revealed that researchers grafted the scalps of aborted babies onto lab rats as part of research funded by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)."

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...ntract-n913051

"Trump administration cancels FDA fetal tissue contract"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/healt...6d3_story.html

"Biden administration removes Trump-era restrictions on fetal tissue research" --- "A brief update for outside scientists from the NIH director’s office said the Department of Health and Human Services was reversing a 2019 decision that had required applicants for federal grants and contracts involving fetal tissue to undergo an extra layer of review by an ethics advisory board."



You body, your choice right? Why are they so supportive of people aborting babies again? Why would they get rid of an Ethics board?

This is chess, not checkers.

[time4fun]

They're supportive because it was a literal public health crisis when women were forced to get back alley abortions. And because women who do have access to reproductive rights face substantial socioeconomic consequences- as do their children.

The fact that you're actually implying that people are pro-choice for fetal tissue contracts tells me that you know absolutely nothing about the history of reproductive rights nor the societal consequences of not having those rights.

Please educate yourself.

[Neveragain]

And because women who do have access to reproductive rights face substantial socioeconomic consequences

A society that practices human sacrifice is a sure sign that society is shit.....

For example, tell us again how men can breastfeed.

[Methais]

No idea why they set it at $600, it could have been $500 or $750. The important thing is that by reporting aggregate transactions exceeding the $600 they will be catching a lot more fraudsters.

One day you'll see your party is trying to destroy our country

[Seran]

Seran doesn't realize that this will just cause a giant run on the banks.

In before "we'll just lock their accounts ~ Seran"

A run on the banks? That's asinine, what basis do you have for this claim? Banks present a secure, often interest bearing means for citizens to store, transfer and utilize their money. That will not change as a result of account balances exceeding a threshold being reported. Some may choose to go bank less to hide fraud, but then some may also choose to go back to horses and buggies to prevent state governments from requiring vehicle registration. That's personal choice.

[Seran]

You body, your choice right? Why are they so supportive of people aborting babies again? Why would they get rid of an Ethics board?

This is chess, not checkers.

Yeah, I'm not quite sure why you've posted it beyond trolling opportunities, but here goes.

Medical science has progressed beyond leeches and purging, over hundreds of years our science based medical advancement has involved the usage of dead bodies and tissues to further understanding of human anatomy and to treat / eliminate illness. The tissue resulting from an abortion is no different in terms of science, than an adult cadaver.

The cost associated with storing and transporting necessary materials for scientific advancement have to be met for then to be available. Some people may feel that the tissues following an abortion should be off limits, but I think that's a personal emotion/religious decision and not a legitimate basis for preventing medical science advancement.

[Methais]

A run on the banks? That's asinine, what basis do you have for this claim? Banks present a secure, often interest bearing means for citizens to store, transfer and utilize their money. That will not change as a result of account balances exceeding a threshold being reported. Some may choose to go bank less to hide fraud, but then some may also choose to go back to horses and buggies to prevent state governments from requiring vehicle registration. That's personal choice.

Enjoy that ultra trash .01% interest rate with banks.

Meanwhile, you can stake/lend stablecoins in the crypto market instead and get much much higher annual returns with pretty much zero risk.


Leave it to Serandroidpk to crusade to being a maximum cuck in every possible way though.