Terrorists break into US Capitol Building

[Methais]

I'm pressing charges.

No wait, wrong one.

Here we go:

[Shaps]

If they decide it was justified, no crime has been committed. People are being charged with breaking into the Capitol though.

Normal situation would 100% agree with you. These are not normal situations.

Before an investigation is complete, police officer involved shootings footage is released and the officer's name is doxxed by insane lefties.

People get arrested for rioting, arson, and assault, but DA's have been releasing them over the past year.

Sadly the disparity in logic and application of the law has been corrupted - and even more sadly the suppression of the events, the suppression of video, and the rewriting of events by mainstream media outlets misleads the public. It's absurd to watch happen, but that's where we are.

[drauz]

Normal situation would 100% agree with you. These are not normal situations.

Before an investigation is complete, police officer involved shootings footage is released and the officer's name is doxxed by insane lefties.

People get arrested for rioting, arson, and assault, but DA's have been releasing them over the past year.

Sadly the disparity in logic and application of the law has been corrupted - and even more sadly the suppression of the events, the suppression of video, and the rewriting of events by mainstream media outlets misleads the public. It's absurd to watch happen, but that's where we are.

Suppression of video? It is on Youtube... It's super easy to find.

[Seran]

Where did I say public sentiment determines if someone is guilty or not? I think we should look at the evidence and facts, not just by whether or not the person was charged. You’re an even bigger boot licker than I thought. We can’t even question the authorities according to you.

You're a fucking idiot. Neither the evidence nor the facts supported a murder charge, which is explicitly what the prosecutor in charge found. Yet you care neither for facts or evidence unless you're the ones choosing both. And yet both of those facts, that you claim she is murder, and the evidence, that she was shot in the not-face and still you're unable to admit the truth. That's why you're a fool.

[Tgo01]

You're a fucking idiot. Neither the evidence nor the facts supported a murder charge

Trump hasn't been charged with a crime yet so remember according to your logic you can't say he's guilty of incitement. Your rules! We have to trust whatever the government tells us.

[Shaps]

Trump hasn't been charged with a crime yet so remember according to your logic you can't say he's guilty of incitement. Your rules! We have to trust whatever the government tells us.

Oh.. I see what you did there... LOL.

[Neveragain]

You don't care about right and wrong

[Methais]

Trump hasn't been charged with a crime yet so remember according to your logic you can't say he's guilty of incitement. Your rules! We have to trust whatever the government tells us.

Technically he was with the 2nd impeachment, and then he was acquitted.

Pretty sure that makes him double not guilty, which is even more not guilty than not being charged in the first place.

[Gelston]

According to the prosecutors no crime has been committed. I think we can speculate outside of what DA’s say, especially given how politically charged these positions have become recently. They haven’t even released the officer’s name 4 months later, when a white officer shoots a black person the officer’s name is usually released within 24-48 hours before any of the facts even come out. What’s the hold up here?

Multiple crimes were committed. That is why the FBI has been arresting everyone they see in pictures.

[Gelston]

Trump hasn't been charged with a crime yet so remember according to your logic you can't say he's guilty of incitement. Your rules! We have to trust whatever the government tells us.

He has been charged twice and acquitted twice.