Page 25 of 217 FirstFirst ... 1523242526273575125 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 250 of 2162

Thread: Terrorists break into US Capitol Building

  1. #241
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PWC, VA
    Posts
    9,132
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    PB is the only one with some balls on the Republican side here to call this for what it is.

    Tgo is just stuck on whataboutism mode.
    No, I am not Drauz in game.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    29,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beldannon5 View Post
    you are wrong park. and Back you are an idiot. however we all know this. This was not a coup. That could still be coming. you don't take a few people and try to supposedly take over one building giving them time to get away if you are doing a coup. Unless i don't understand how coups work. Once again it shouldn't have happened but it was far from insurrection or a coup
    This is dangerous thinking. So now, anyone with any kind of grievence against the US government can just forcibly break into the US Capitol, ransack it, and thats just no big deal to you? Can the mafia do that? Can the Navajo Nation do that? Can granny and her knitting circle do that? No fucking way is it ok or no big deal.
    Last edited by Back; 01-11-2021 at 07:33 PM.

  3. #243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    Do you blame President Trump for the terrorists breaking into the US Capitol?

    66% of registered voters do.

    Would you support President Trump being immediately removed from office, whether via the 25th Amendment or impeachment?

    50% of registered voters do, including a plurality of independents. (ibid)
    Corroboration from another source: 51% of adults support President Trump being immediately removed from office "for promoting this unrest."
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  4. #244
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,611
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    Corroboration from another source: 51% of adults support President Trump being immediately removed from office "for promoting this unrest."
    Less than 1400 polled in your quoted link and under 600 in the other.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  5. #245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
    You want to know what's wrong with communism?

    Are we talking about the theory you learned at the MCAD or actual real life?
    Congratulations- you have demonstrated that you have nothing to offer.

    But I'll help you out here. The problem with Communist and Socialist countries during the Cold War wasn't the socialism/economic systems. After all, China has a socialist economy, and it's the second largest economy in the world. At the time Russia had one of the biggest economies in the world.

    It was exactly what I already brought up (which you apparently missed or didn't understand): they weren't (and still aren't) free societies. THAT'S what was, and is, wrong with them.

    They are, and were, under single party rule and had no democratic form of government. Even today, Russia *technically* has a democracy, but the government has full control over the elections and is a big fan of adding ballots. And the Legislative bodies are terrified of defying Putin because they tend to disappear when they do (which means the leader of the country also controls the legislature with fear...which should sound really familiar). China technically has multiple parties, but the Chinese Communist Party is the official state party. It directs everything, and the other political parties are allowed to exist as long as they don't act like opposition parties. And the Chinese Communist Party ultimately determines the highest levels of leadership in the country (not on paper but absolutely in practice).

    And here's why this matters: because somewhere along the way you all got your brains scrambled and started believing that Capitalism meant libertarianism, and that socialism refers to the government providing social services to its people. And now you, for absolutely insane and inexplicable reasons, have decided that helping people in need is evil and oppression. But having government that provides services to its people was A) never something exclusive to socialist/communist countries AT ALL and B) not remotely why people attacked those systems of government to begin with.

    Actually what was, and is, wrong with the truly socialist and communist countries is the lack of free and fair elections for the highest levels of office, the existence of either an official or defacto state party, and the lack of free press and an independent judiciary. They're the same things that are wrong with Poland (which is turning into a crisis in the EU) and Hungary.

    And it's literally what the GOP has been focusing on. Gerrymandering states so heavily that the opposition party needs 70% of the vote to control 50% of the seats. Massive voter suppression initiatives aimed at disenfranchising groups that are less likely to vote for them. Stacking the Courts with highly ideological judges, many of whom are unqualified for the job but who can be counted on to render certain decisions. Attacking the free press and calling them "the enemy of the people". And trying to overturn legitimate democratic elections in order to ensure their President can stay in power, despite the will of the people.

    So not only do none of you actually know what Marxism, Socialism, or Communism is. You've completely missed the point of why people have been so against those things. In fact the party you support has become increasingly anti-democratic and is doing the same things that turned people against real Socialist/Communist/Marxist countries.
    Last edited by time4fun; 01-07-2021 at 07:03 PM.

  6. #246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drauz View Post
    Tgo is just stuck on whataboutism mode.
    No I'm totally on board with this new fangled terminology all the cool kids are using these days. This was a largely peaceful protest. I mean shit, considering the only person who fired a gun was a police officer, the only person who was injured/murdered was an innocent civilian, and no private property was destroyed or looted, I would say this is the actual definition of largely peaceful, unlike the leftist led "largely peaceful" riots that have been going on for months.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    This is dangerous thinking. So now, anyone with any kind of grievence against the US government can just forcibly break into the US Capital, ransack it, and thats just no big deal to you? Can the mafia do that? Can the Navajo Nation do that? Can granny and her knitting circle do that? No fucking way is it ok or no big deal.
    I am not saying this wasn't a big deal. I am saying it wasn't like people are saying it was. IT SHOULDN"T HAVE HAPPENED. no one shoudl be able to or should do it. NO OKAY

  8. #248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    No I'm totally on board with this new fangled terminology all the cool kids are using these days. This was a largely peaceful protest. I mean shit, considering the only person who fired a gun was a police officer, the only person who was injured/murdered was an innocent civilian, and no private property was destroyed or looted, I would say this is the actual definition of largely peaceful, unlike the leftist led "largely peaceful" riots that have been going on for months.
    So the missing mail and laptop wasn't looting.

    Smashing the memorial for a recently deceased black man isn't destroying federal property.

    Breaking windows to try to get past the barricade is apparently not vandalism.
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  9. #249

    Default

    https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreak...ing_to_breach/

    https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreak...ing_woman_not/

    Totally peaceful breaking of windows and climbing over the barricade by said peaceful and innocent citizen.
    Last edited by Alfster; 01-07-2021 at 07:17 PM.
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  10. #250

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    So the missing mail and laptop wasn't looting.

    Smashing the memorial for a recently deceased black man isn't destroying federal property.

    Breaking windows to try to get past the barricade is apparently not vandalism.
    I said no private property was destroyed. Are you so dumb you need me to explain the difference between public and private property?

    Oh wait, I almost forgot who I was talking to, of course you’re that dumb.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-02-2021, 11:11 PM
  2. Statuary Hall in the Capitol
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-21-2017, 10:52 AM
  3. The 50 Most Beautiful People on Capitol Hill
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-29-2014, 09:07 PM
  4. Muslims Being Accommodated in the TN Capitol?
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-26-2013, 12:53 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-12-2008, 04:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •