Quote Originally Posted by Bobmuhthol View Post
You're making my point for me. You simultaneously want it to be true that graffiti is both violent and a crime, but not a violent crime. Well, if it's a nonviolent crime, then it isn't violent to a reasonable person.
Again I never said anything wasn't a crime, you brought up both crime AND graffiti, I merely asked FlayedAngel if he considered property damage to be violence since he has often referred to the protests as "largely peaceful."

Again would "non-peaceful" work better for your sensibilities?