Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[Back]

So people running for president can't be investigated for possible crimes? What about people who are currently president?

Trump is targeting the Bidens for political gain. Don't be naive.

Are you ready to state here for the record that you would approve of the next Democratic president asking any foreign government to investigate any of Trump's children's dealings without any evidence whatsoever of wrongdoing?

[Tgo01]

Trump is targeting the Bidens for political gain. Don't be naive.

And the endless stream of butthurt Democrats aren't targeting Trump for political gain?

So the endless nonsense and endless investigations into Trump is seeking justice, but just the mere mention of investigating Biden or any Democrat is "targeting for political gain"? Do I understand the fucked up brain that is Back?

Are you ready to state here for the record that you would approve of the next Democratic president asking any foreign government to investigate any of Trump's children's dealings without any evidence whatsoever of wrongdoing?

Without any evidence? Absolutely not. Biden BRAGGED ON VIDEO about withholding money until Ukraine fired the prosecutor investigating the company his son worked for. Doesn't that at least warrant an investigation? No? But third and fourth hand hearsay warrants an impeachment? This is too much even for you, Back.

[Alfster]

Come on now, Back, even someone like you can surely see this is starting to look like complete bullshit.

"Whistleblower" with third and fourth hand information comes forward with accusations that are mostly false. The whistleblower spoke with top Democrats in the House prior to coming forward. Democrats say it's bad shit and demand transcripts of the phone call, expecting Trump to deny the request and using that as further evidence that Trump is corrupt.

Instead Trump complies with the demand, the transcript shows the whistleblower is mostly wrong, Democrats immediately move on to the next talking point that the transcript isn't important, Adam Schiff realizes the whistleblower complaint is such shit that he has to literally make up what Trump said in the transcript to make Trump look as bad as possible and John Brennan practically begs more "whistleblowers" to come forward and wouldn't you know it? More "whistleblowers" come forward.

Even someone of your limited intelligence has to admit this all seems rather suspect, even if you don't want to flat out admit it's all bullshit.

You're world is one of the most willful ignorant ones out there. Jesus dude, you're full in on all th propoganda and too stupid to notice.

You're missing major pieces here, but Breitbart and fox won't show you those. You cry about fake news, then intentionally position yourself to only believe your safe spaces.

[Back]

And the endless stream of butthurt Democrats aren't targeting Trump for political gain?

Trump should be investigated because he has not been forthcoming about anything to the point of obstruction over a so-called witch hunt. If there were nothing to hide he would not be trying so hard to hide things. Wouldn't the best way to say "shut up democrats" be to show them everything to prove there is nothing there? Instead Trump has gone out of his way to obstruct the Mueller investigation from start to finish.

That investigation did find that Russia meddled in our election and that Trump could be arrested as soon as he leaves office. Trump was the one who benefited from the meddling, Trump's operatives met with Russians in Trump tower and lied about it, Trump asked the Russians to hack the DNC emails and they did.

So the endless nonsense and endless investigations into Trump is seeking justice, but just the mere mention of investigating Biden or any Democrat is "targeting for political gain"? Do I understand the fucked up brain that is Back?

Except the investigation into Trump includes him obstructing American lawmakers while the Bidens have been cleared of any wrongdoing already. The investigation into Trump is by Americans. Trump is asking foreign governments to investigate a political rival and his son.

Without any evidence? Absolutely not. Biden BRAGGED ON VIDEO about withholding money until Ukraine fired the prosecutor investigating the company his son worked for.

Biden bragged about being a part of the reason a corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor was fired, who was not investigating his son but the owner of the company his son was on the board of, and that allies in the EU also thought that prosecutor should go.

Doesn't that at least warrant an investigation? No? But third and fourth hand hearsay warrants an impeachment? This is too much even for you, Back.

Its much more than third and fourth hand hearsay at this point. You should check some other sources of information than those who are trying to deceive you into believing your enemies are other Americans.

[Tgo01]

You're world is one of the most willful ignorant ones out there. Jesus dude, you're full in on all th propoganda and too stupid to notice.

Just tell me what I'm wrong about. You always do this, just post vague nonsense about how I'm always wrong and watch Fox News or something. Put up or shut the fuck up and get off deez nuts already.

[Tgo01]

If there were nothing to hide he would not be trying so hard to hide things.

Talk about irony.

while the Bidens have been cleared of any wrongdoing already.

Whom exactly cleared the Bidens of any wrongdoing? Have a link handy?

[~Rocktar~]

I love this, there is a ABC video where they have Rep Hakeen Jeffries spewing the company line about if Trum has done nothing wrong, why does he keep hiding things. Lack of transparency doesn't mean you committed a crime. Not talking to a government investigator does not mean guilt. I love this BS. This is Joseph Goebbels at his finest.

[Back]

Whom exactly cleared the Bidens of any wrongdoing? Have a link handy?

There is stuff out there.

Here is one good link that debunks the claim.

https://theintercept.com/2019/05/10/...reformer-says/

[Tgo01]

There is stuff out there.

Here is one good link that debunks the claim.

https://theintercept.com/2019/05/10/...reformer-says/

I was going to read the entire article but that's a lot of nonsense to sift through. I did get through the first few paragraphs and I can't help but notice not a single formal investigation was mentioned at all. Is there one mentioned later in the article that you can quote for me?

Or is it when it comes to Biden we can rely on "an American-educated lawyer who founded Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption Action Center" to clear not only Joe Biden but also his son, but when it comes to Trump we need endless investigations which cost the American taxpayers tens of millions of dollars?

[Back]

I was going to read the entire article but that's a lot of nonsense to sift through. I did get through the first few paragraphs and I can't help but notice not a single formal investigation was mentioned at all. Is there one mentioned later in the article that you can quote for me?

To investigate what? That the vice president was doing his job?

Or is it when it comes to Biden we can rely on "an American-educated lawyer who founded Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption Action Center" to clear not only Joe Biden but also his son, but when it comes to Trump we need endless investigations which cost the American taxpayers tens of millions of dollars?

Yes but only because there are obvious signs that Trump has obstructed an official investigation here in America, sought assistance from an adversarial foreign government in the 2016 election, and has now openly asked for more from Ukraine and China. And thats just in the top 5 things Trump has done to undermine the American government. Remember, Trump has said believes Putin over our own intelligence community.