Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[Seran]

The problem with folks like Tgo01 is no matter how much evidence or proof you dig up, you'll always be ridiculed and ordered to produce more in further defense of your argument. People like It don't bother with fact, they go write op-eds for FoxNews and Breitbart screaming as loudly and often as they can knowing they'll never be asked to provide substance.

[Neveragain]

Here's the exact section from the report:



I expect you're too busy screaming to read any of that, of course. You get more unhinged daily.

The last sentence is all that needs to be read.

"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

The report finds that Trump didn't commit a crime. There is no such thing as being exonerated when there is no evidence that a crime was committed. The exoneration takes place when there is no evidence, quit being retarded.

You, Mueller and the democrats need to go back and take criminal justice 101. Unless of course you knowingly don't give a fuck about our justice system, well.., that would make you all tyrants.


The way Mueller (let's face it, Mueller didn't write the report) worded this, it basically states "We couldn't find evidence but we don't want to admit that we're retarded"

[Neveragain]

The problem with folks like Tgo01 is no matter how much evidence or proof you dig up, you'll always be ridiculed and ordered to produce more in further defense of your argument. People like It don't bother with fact, they go write op-eds for FoxNews and Breitbart screaming as loudly and often as they can knowing they'll never be asked to provide substance.

Imagine being so vastly retarded that you have come up with your own evidence even after the DOJ didn't find shit after 3 years.

[Seran]

The last sentence is all that needs to be read.

"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

You just quoted something that invalidates your entire argument. it also does not exonerate him." The entirety of the report is based on the fact that there's no jurisdiction to charge a crime. The sentence clearly points out that the report does not charge nor exonerate Trump

You're an idiot.

[Gelston]

You just quoted something that invalidates your entire argument. it also does not exonerate him." The entirety of the report is based on the fact that there's no jurisdiction to charge a crime. The sentence clearly points out that the report does not charge nor exonerate Trump

You're an idiot.

You are innocent until proven guilty. They said there is nothing pointing to him committing a crime.

[Neveragain]

You just quoted something that invalidates your entire argument. it also does not exonerate him." The entirety of the report is based on the fact that there's no jurisdiction to charge a crime. The sentence clearly points out that the report does not charge nor exonerate Trump

You're an idiot.

So we spent 2 1/2 years to find no evidence but we can't exonerate because we have no evidence to prove that a crime was committed. This is not how the American legal system works. How this was even investigated without any evidence proves it's a sham, a county judge wouldn't even consider this case.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Trump in his presser saying "Dems should ask for all the conversations. Pence's conversations. The first conversation. They were perfect. Wonderful conversations".

Troll ranking = Epic.

[Tgo01]

Here's the exact section from the report:



I expect you're too busy screaming to read any of that, of course. You get more unhinged daily.

So no where in the Mueller report did it state that the only reason he didn't charge the president was because he couldn't?

Thought as much. Don't you feel cleaner now having actually read the report and coming to the concl...oh that's right, you still think somewhere in there he is saying if it weren't for that darn OLC opinion I would have indicted that bastard!

How do you still say this with a straight face when Mueller, the man himself, testifying under oath before congress, said that narrative was NOT true? How do you do that?

Aren't you a teacher or something? How did you get that job? "I hate America and Democracy more than any of these other communists applying for this job!" It's the only thing that makes sense after watching you fail so hard at even the simplest of tasks over and over again.

[Tgo01]

The problem with folks like Tgo01 is no matter how much evidence or proof you dig up, you'll always be ridiculed and ordered to produce more in further defense of your argument.

That's not true. I just want SOME evidence to begin with.

Like for example: show me in the transcript exactly where Trump said something to the effect of "You won't see a dime until you prosecute Biden's son!"

Just that? Am I asking too much? I guess I am

[Seran]

That's not true. I just said SOME evidence to begin with.

Like for example: show me in the transcript exactly where Trump said something to the effect of "You won't see a dime until you prosecute Biden's son!"

Just that? Am I asking too much? I guess I am

QED