My goodbye forever rant

[Fortybox]

Answer the question and stop deflecting. I believe Simu more and more the longer this thread goes and the lack of responses to the actual allegations Coase is making.

[Mobius1]

Answer the question and stop deflecting. I believe Simu more and more the longer this thread goes and the lack of responses to the actual allegations Coase is making.

Exactly this. People keep making references to the wiki not having enough info, so on and so forth. But that in no way has any bearing on what Simu is ACTUALLY accusing them of.

To quote the accusations from the logs posted:

Mazreth says, "Well, since all I have are the notes to go on, I can say that a discussion about intentions to exploit the bug before it was discovered are the primary reason anyone and everyone involoved is getting a warning."

Coase says, "We also, unfortunately, discovered evidence that that you were aware that this was a bug, discussed it with others, did not report it, and continued to abuse it."

So again, I ask for like the third or fourth time - Is Simu lying, and you did not know it was supposed to be un-enchantable, and you did not discuss it with anyone?

I know of several people that enchanted it and did not get warnings. Likely because Simu had no evidence that they knew it was a bug. But the ones that got warnings, they claim there is evidence of exploitation. Not only that, they claim that it was even purposefully being exploited BECAUSE they found out about it.

So you can tell me all you want that the wiki isn't clear about it, but were you TRULY ignorant about its enchantability?

If what Simu says is true, consider yourself lucky you didn't get a ban.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Exactly this. People keep making references to the wiki not having enough info, so on and so forth. But that in no way has any bearing on what Simu is ACTUALLY accusing them of.

To quote the accusations from the logs posted:





So again, I ask for like the third or fourth time - Is Simu lying, and you did not know it was supposed to be un-enchantable, and you did not discuss it with anyone?

I know of several people that enchanted it and did not get warnings. Likely because Simu had no evidence that they knew it was a bug. But the ones that got warnings, they claim there is evidence of exploitation. Not only that, they claim that it was even purposefully being exploited BECAUSE they found out about it.

So you can tell me all you want that the wiki isn't clear about it, but were you TRULY ignorant about its enchantability?

If what Simu says is true, consider yourself lucky you didn't get a ban.

No one is going to come out and publicly tell you they knew it was a bug and were planning on exploiting it. Get real.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

No one is going to come out and publicly tell you they knew it was a bug and were planning on exploiting it. Get real.

Let me amend that to say, no one with a live account.

[Mobius1]

No one is going to come out and publicly tell you they knew it was a bug and were planning on exploiting it. Get real.

And silence is generally taken as an admission of guilt.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

And silence is generally taken as an admission of guilt.

WTF country do you live in?

[Mobius1]

WTF country do you live in?

A country where we have a decent capability to use deductive reasoning?

The GMs said there is evidence they knew. Evidence that was compelling enough for them to give warnings to some of their beloved Pay 2 Win players.

My question has been deflected several times, even by you, such as right now. So what is any reasoning individual supposed to conclude? I'd say the scales weigh heavily on Simu's side.

It's even more telling, since Simu did not give warnings to everyone.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

A country where we have a decent capability to use deductive reasoning?

The GMs said there is evidence they knew. Evidence that was compelling enough for them to give warnings to some of their beloved Pay 2 Win players.

My question has been deflected several times, even by you, such as right now. So what is any reasoning individual supposed to conclude? I'd say the scales weigh heavily on Simu's side.

It's even more telling, since Simu did not give warnings to everyone.

Ok, lets play your guilty unless you respond game.

Did you, or did you not, touch an underaged girl without her permission?

[Mobius1]

Ok, lets play your guilty unless you respond game.

Did you, or did you not, touch an underaged girl without her permission?

Yes

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Yes

Well there you go. You are correct, it's so much easier when you assume guilt with no facts at all.