Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
I don't think they can convict him of collusion and I don't mean to be a stickler but we're having all kinds of issues here with the "collusion is not a crime" thing. My preference is that we can use the word collusion as an umbrella term which encapsulates conspiracy, bribery, and all kinds of other acts illegal acts which make up collusion without arguing the definitions anymore. In your opinion, is that ok? I'm not going to put words in your mouth here, but I think that's what you've just said.
Well technically you can be impeached for anything. SCOTUS would probably be VERY wary of wading into that battle, and barring that there's no actual check on impeachment proceedings.

So we don't need to stick to strict juridical terms when it comes to hypothetical impeachment.