I don't get it. What am I missing here? You really want me to explain the difference between what's essentially a dress code issue and the constitution?
Now if this kid is able to make a 1st amendment case out of this, and it doesn't get laughed out of court, then we have something to consider.
We could try it in places like Parkland and see what happens. It probably won't hurt. Kids will get used to it. They'll start cutting out pipe shaped holes in the pages of their books to smuggle contraband.
Check this out:
This popped up on Facebook recently. This is what I've been talking about with how we get laws. Park owners are being accused of designing it themselves to save money on engineering and math. Now Kansas will probably have to make stricter laws because that's how laws happen.Although several other states rejected proposals to build Verrückt, lax amusement ride regulations in Kansas permitted its construction at the Schlitterbahn water park, reported local Fox affiliate WDAF-TV.
http://huffp.st/uMygi03
Last edited by cwolff; 03-26-2018 at 03:57 AM.
So you're saying people will find a way to get around laws no matter what?
It really is great for this discussion because we have a bunch of people talking with no expertise (like these school kids) and just relying on trial and error but without knowing whats already been tried.This popped up on Facebook recently. This is what I've been talking about with how we get laws. Park owners are being accused of designing it themselves to save money on engineering and math. Now Kansas will probably have to make stricter laws because that's how laws happen.
Last edited by drauz; 03-26-2018 at 04:05 AM.
We know what's been tried and the assault weapon ban had a positive impact on mass shootings.
Edit:And no, about the getting around things. You'll never stop crime 100%. We do know ways to deter it.
The article is an example of laws working. Dude had to find a state that didn't have laws against his half assed engineering
Last edited by cwolff; 03-26-2018 at 04:18 AM.