Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

[Tenlaar]

The Second Amendment doesn't have limitations

Except for that whole well regulated militia thing, but why pay attention to that bit and the historical context?

[Gelston]

For what purpose does someone need a fully automatic weapon?

[Tgo01]

For what purpose does someone need a fully automatic weapon?

[Androidpk]

Bump stocks are flying off the shelves.

[Gelston]

No, for that you need...

[Parkbandit]

The Second Amendment doesn't have limitations and is not about hunting. The automatic weapons ban is a farce and is simply a step down the slope. Why should law abiding citizens be restricted from owning what they want?

Then we shouldn't go down the slope at all?

Ok, then you are fine with anyone owning a fully auto machine gun?

What about a rocket launcher?

What about a tank?

What about a nuclear weapon?

Do you see how your argument makes no sense at all?

[Tenlaar]

No, for that you need...

FTFY

[~Rocktar~]

Except for that whole well regulated militia thing, but why pay attention to that bit and the historical context?

Lots of legal scholars have argued both ways. Based on the English standards at the time it does not modify the primary sentence which includes ". . . shall not be infringed."

[~Rocktar~]

Then we shouldn't go down the slope at all?

Ok, then you are fine with anyone owning a fully auto machine gun?

What about a rocket launcher?

What about a tank?

What about a nuclear weapon?

Do you see how your argument makes no sense at all?

Yes I am fine with people owning those things assuming they can afford them. My argument is perfectly accurate and denotes a social reality with laws and the decay of society. If you are not committing harm on others then why should not not be able to own whatever you want? Why is it that wen a drunk hits someone, it's the drunk's fault, when a suicide bomber kills people, it's the bomber's fault, when a terrorist (or fucked up rich teen brat) drives into a crowd it's their fault but when someone shoots people (other than in Tennessee) it's the gun's fault?

[Androidpk]

Yes I am fine with people owning those things assuming they can afford them.

And I thought Back was the king of stupidity. Congratulations on stealing his crown.