Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[Gelston]

Took you long enough.

He's been effectively trolling you since June 2011.

The better educated our people are, the people we do in the world.

[Back]

No vitriol here.

I think the abolition of slavery can respectfully be seen as a motivating factor for the Union later in the war. Definitely wasn't the goal earlier on.

Glad you're doing some research. Silly, but fun argument.

Yeah these PC back and forths are alway silly. Entertaining though I have to admit. And despite myself I realized the other day that even though I engage in the silliness ultimately it forces me to actually research things I have not thought about in years. So there is a positive to it all.

I think this is where we have to agree to disagree about abolition. Unless you would agree that any opinion on abolition and it's role in the Civil War is open to interpretation? I can say that abolition at a certain point could have been used as a tool while still maintaining the integrity of it's intent. But I have to stand by abolition as the primary reason that drove what ultimately became the Civil War.

[Parkbandit]

"Agree to disagree" is seriously the dumbest saying ever.

Well.. maybe that the North fought in the civil war to enforce the Emancipation Proclamation might be just as dumb..

[Neveragain]

Yeah these PC back and forths are alway silly. Entertaining though I have to admit. And despite myself I realized the other day that even though I engage in the silliness ultimately it forces me to actually research things I have not thought about in years. So there is a positive to it all.

I think this is where we have to agree to disagree about abolition. Unless you would agree that any opinion on abolition and it's role in the Civil War is open to interpretation? I can say that abolition at a certain point could have been used as a tool while still maintaining the integrity of it's intent. But I have to stand by abolition as the primary reason that drove what ultimately became the Civil War.

I think I have done an excellent job providing you with the evidence that the average person gave 0 shits about slavery. Every "argument" provided are the same excuses used by those that were pro-slavery.

It's not human, they can't survive on their own, the abolitionists are crazy. I would go as far as comparing the abolitionists of the time to the Jehovah witness that comes knocking at your door.

It's OK though, like the abolitionist, the pro-life movement does not measure a persons humanity by the stage of life it's currently in. We see a nation that has been slaughtering human beings for personal convenience and within a decade it will be abolished.

[Tenlaar]

I think I have done an excellent job

Somehow I am not surprised.

[Neveragain]

Your weird attempts to equate so many things to abortion never work, and it just makes you look...well, like a weird person who keeps bringing abortion up when nobody else was talking about it.

I agree, it's weird that we charge an assailant with double homicide if they murder a pregnant woman.

Oh dear, an anon person from the PC thinks I'm weird. I better go sit in the corner or I may not get picked. The 3rd grade was awesome good times.

[Tenlaar]

I agree, it's weird that we charge an assailant with double homicide if they murder a pregnant woman.

The concept that a woman should have the right to terminate her pregnancy and not somebody else by violent means, thus there is a criminal charge associated with it, should not be that hard to grasp. Assuming you made it through the third grade that you mentioned.

[Neveragain]

The concept that a woman should have the right to terminate her pregnancy and not somebody else by violent means, thus there is a criminal charge associated with it, should not be that hard to grasp. Assuming you made it through the third grade that you mentioned.

So it is a human life? I mean how do you charge a person for a second murder if there was no 2nd human murdered? How do you terminate something that has not started, that being the start of a human life.

I'm just trying to grasp the logic here to which there is no logic to grasp. There is no logic in the thought that a woman decides when it's a human being, where is the science in this idea?

[Neveragain]

This is fantastic.

Grey rep

white noise faggot lmao, ignore list needed more idiots

:cough: coward :cough:

Yes that ignore list must be yuuuuge with your grey rep and all.

[Tenlaar]

I'm just trying to grasp the logic here to which there is no logic to grasp.

You are starting from a point where it being a human life and a woman having a choice to terminate it are mutually exclusive. This is incorrect. You put your own parameters on any counter-argument before it can even made, which is why you aren't even arguing anything, you're just somebody who likes to bring up abortion when nobody else is talking about it.