More Obamacare fuckups

[Methais]

Didn't they slip the whole "federal government is taking over student loans" thing into Obamacare too? That was a pretty dick move too.

[Androidpk]

1. Premiums are skyrocketing because a) no one can get the legislation done to make the necessary tweaks that would normally come with a new large program and b) Sen. Rubio included in a must-pass bill about 2 years ago a provision that required the risk corridor reimbursement program to be revenue neutral. This killed off reimbursement payments from the government that all the insurers were dependent on because they did not have the underwriting experience to anticipate how sick or healthy their signups would be. For the new health insurance co-ops, this effectively killed them because they needed that money to replenish their reserves. For the larger insurance companies, this forced them to raise premiums to cover reserves. A lot of them are pulling out of the exchanges because they needed those payments in order to not take a loss. This, of course, creates an anti-competitive situation in quite a few states.

This is literally the only legislative accomplishment I think Rubio had during his entire Senate term. Not sure why he didn't run on it during the primary. I'd have figured "Guy who killed Obamacare" would've picked up a lot of GOP primary votes.

2. You're still deflecting as to what in Obamacare you find disagreeable. At least I know where Tgo stands - he wants single payer. You? It seems to me that your political philosophy is so incoherent that you can't even figure out what you support. I have no idea at this point why you were pro-Sanders.

Liking a candidate doesn't automatically mean falling in line with every single one of their political positions.

[Taernath]

Liking a candidate doesn't automatically mean falling in line with every single one of their political positions.

Are you a single issue voter on marijuana legalization?

[Androidpk]

Liking a candidate doesn't automatically mean falling in line with every single one of their political positions.

Thread: More Obamacare fuckups
Zero. Self. Awareness. So much for me being "delusional," and "everyone" thinking how obviously NOT conservative you are. Have fun palling around with your fellow conservatives.

So much salt from you, Ashley.

[Methais]

Thread: More Obamacare fuckups
Zero. Self. Awareness. So much for me being "delusional," and "everyone" thinking how obviously NOT conservative you are. Have fun palling around with your fellow conservatives.

So much salt from you, Ashley.

Give him a break, he's special needs.

[Androidpk]

Give him a break, he's special needs.

Special. Needs.

[Kembal]

Liking a candidate doesn't automatically mean falling in line with every single one of their political positions.

It generally means that either:

a) you have party allegiance to the candidate;
b) you agree with a considerable amount of their political positions; or
c) you know the candidate personally

A and C don't apply here. So what exactly did you agree with Bernie on?

[Gelston]

It generally means that either:

a) you have party allegiance to the candidate;
b) you agree with a considerable amount of their political positions; or
c) you know the candidate personally

A and C don't apply here. So what exactly did you agree with Bernie on?

Or you agree with more of their stances than the other candidate?

[Methais]

Or you agree with more of their stances than the other candidate?

Or you would rather anybody be in office that isn't Hillary.

[Androidpk]

It generally means that either:

a) you have party allegiance to the candidate;
b) you agree with a considerable amount of their political positions; or
c) you know the candidate personally

A and C don't apply here. So what exactly did you agree with Bernie on?

again with the assumptions..