At this point you have to look at the clinical definition of schizophrenia. It gets a bit philosophical, but...if you look at the pure definition of it, the temporary delusional paranoia reported by marijuana users in your studies would constitute schizophrenic disorder, even though it rarely manifests itself as anything more dangerous than peering out your blinds incessantly.
...and that's precisely my problem. Schizophrenia, as a clinical diagnoses, has many facets. You saying you're using the term "only for itself" means you're ignoring the fact that there are serious variants to the diagnoses, similar to "autism spectrum"...some autistics are completely incapable of participating in normal society, while others only need to be trained in certain coping mechanisms to be almost completely self-sufficient through normal life.This is not an accurate depiction of my position. I am using the term schizophrenia only for itself.
It shows an incredible lack of knowledge about a topic you seem to be so fervent about. Quite frankly, I don't see how you would expect anyone here to take you seriously after this, even those who may have, before now.
This further shows your lack of knowledge in this field. Psychotic and Affective are not equal classifications. It's not either/or.In the past I have repeatedly highlighted the interesting fact that marijuana is linked only with psychotic disorders and not affective ones. Affective disorders are clearly bad, so if I was doing what you were saying, why would I explicitly say marijuana DOESN'T cause them?
I can honestly say, no. This goes back to the fact that not all schizophrenia is the same. Even if I knew they would have the most severe form, I wouldn't be for "curing" them...eugenics isn't really my field. There is a very long love/hate relationship between genius and insanity...and personally, I envy the mentally invalid. They live a care-free life, and have never once tried to comprehend the things in my head daily...God bless them.Since you bring up your personal experience, suppose you were guaranteed that your child would develop schizophrenia. Would you subject them to a treatment that had a 1 in 5000 chance of killing them if you were also guaranteed it would cure them?
You say this from a position of someone who hasn't been there, and assumes the worst because you don't know any better. It's common.If I had a child, I am pretty confident I would do so if it spared them my mental illnesses.
You're full of shit, see above.I can't speak for America, but I believe it should be because I have investigated the facts of the matter. This is usually a better approach than believing rhetoric.
More likely he realized you're a complete tard, as I've unequivocally proven above.Kaldonis was operating under the mistaken belief that marijuana use and schizophrenia are uncorrelated. If you hold that belief, my contention that there is a causal link makes no sense. As I say, though, that belief is mistaken. I assumed that Kaldonis became aware of this, which is why he never responded to my question asking him to back it up.![]()