View Poll Results: Political affiliation?

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Republican (and tacos)

    4 9.76%
  • Democrat (and tacos)

    7 17.07%
  • Independent (and tacos)

    16 39.02%
  • Other (and tacos)

    14 34.15%
Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 100

Thread: Let's clarify some things!

  1. #71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Anyone with a microphone and camera can make people seem any way they want through editing. FOX does it all the time.
    ???

    I can buy the argument that these types of videos usually just show the people that look stupid and ignore the ones where people were actually able to give good answers but...what?

    That's not what you're saying...at least that's now what you typed. You're saying with just a camera and a microphone that anyone can make anyone look any way they want with "editing"? Like...we can edit footage in such a way as to...what are you saying?

    You should stick to making your arguments on Youtube videos if that were the case, Back, then you could edit the videos in a way so it looks like you make sense.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    28,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Five View Post
    Tolerance does not mean tolerating intolerance. It's intolerance that does not tolerate tolerance.

  3. #73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thondalar View Post
    That would require me to register either Democrat or Republican. I can't bring myself to do that, because I'm neither of those things. Although there are times I would like to vote in a closed Primary, I can't simply switch parties on a whim. It would be at least dishonest, to myself most of all. It's not "disenfranchising" in the least. It would be no different than saying all Democrats are voluntarily disenfranchising themselves for not registering Republican, because they can't vote in the Republican Primary.
    They get to vote in a primary. You get to vote in none. Standing on principle can be commendable, but that's not what this is. Democrat is literally defined as those people who are registered with the party. You don't get a lobotomy, you don't get sent to a re-education camp, you aren't compelled to support them in any way. It costs you nothing and doubles the impact of your vote.

    Perhaps this will be my new quintessential example for rationalism vs. empiricism. It is inconceivable to me why you are crippling your voice this way.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atlanteax
    Well, you just nailed why Obama was elected ...

    So very sad it is about Hillary being a woman, or first female president, and zip on *merits* (again, just like how it happened for Obama).
    Obama was a Senator, Hilary was a Senator and Administrative Assistant of State. We're not talking about Robin Williams here.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  4. #74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    They get to vote in a primary. You get to vote in none. Standing on principle can be commendable, but that's not what this is. Democrat is literally defined as those people who are registered with the party. You don't get a lobotomy, you don't get sent to a re-education camp, you aren't compelled to support them in any way. It costs you nothing and doubles the impact of your vote.
    I think Latrin just admitted that him supposedly being a registered Republican doesn't mean jack.

  5. #75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    That's not what you're saying...at least that's now what you typed. You're saying with just a camera and a microphone that anyone can make anyone look any way they want with "editing"? Like...we can edit footage in such a way as to...what are you saying?
    It used to be a very common criticism of the Daily Show.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  6. #76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    I think Latrin just admitted that him supposedly being a registered Republican doesn't mean jack.
    It means I get to vote twice every election. Party registration has never been identically correlated with ideology, for electors or electees.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  7. #77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    It used to be a very common criticism of the Daily Show.
    Sure if you're taking their comments out of context or if you're showing a clip of what someone said yesterday then a clip of what they said 20 years ago so it looks like they contradicted themselves but that's not what's happening in this video. Not even close. Not even in the same ballpark, heck not even on the same planet! Dare I say not even in the same galaxy? I dare say it.

  8. #78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Sure if you're taking their comments out of context or if you're showing a clip of what someone said yesterday then a clip of what they said 20 years ago so it looks like they contradicted themselves but that's not what's happening in this video. Not even close. Not even in the same ballpark, heck not even on the same planet! Dare I say not even in the same galaxy? I dare say it.
    That is another criticism of the Daily Show, but I'm referring specifically to editing interviews (including splicing in footage not recorded at the time) to make the target look bad.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  9. #79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Anyone with a microphone and camera can make people seem any way they want through editing. FOX does it all the time.
    So are you saying that the people in that video really did know what Hillary's accomplishments were, but thanks to clever editing it made like they didn't have a clue, and also that only Fox does this editing you speak of?

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Tolerance does not mean tolerating intolerance. It's intolerance that does not tolerate tolerance.
    Who are some of these intolerant people you speak of? White people and Christians, but only if they're not liberals, right?
    Last edited by Methais; 05-15-2014 at 01:41 PM.
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  10. #80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    That is another criticism of the Daily Show, but I'm referring specifically to editing interviews (including splicing in footage not recorded at the time) to make the target look bad.
    Daily Show criticism aside I'd like to hear how you think these interviews were edited in such a way to make these people look stupid. I'd also like to hear you explain that armed with just a camera, microphone and editing software one can make anyone seem any way they want.

    And...GO!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 43
    Last Post: 07-16-2018, 03:26 PM
  2. Things
    By Ardwen in forum High-End Valuables
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-13-2018, 09:13 PM
  3. A Few Things
    By bun in forum Appraisals
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-11-2010, 11:53 PM
  4. 3 Things
    By Drisco in forum Auctions
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 03:36 PM
  5. The more things change the more things stay the same...
    By StrayRogue in forum Social Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-21-2005, 11:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •