
Originally Posted by
Ker_Thwap
Ask yourself if you think the prosecution and punishment of Sterling was done in generally liberal manner, or a generally conservative manner. I think he was "prosecuted" in a generally conservative manner.
They didn't care that he might have had his privacy violated. (not legally)
Didn't suggest he go to a Jason Kidd 6 month re-education clinic.
Didn't care that this man was brainwashed by the 1950s society
Didn't care that he's part of a protected class, age (fading mental faculties?)
Didn't care about a unilateral decision without hearing his side of the story, suggestions for improvement.
Exulted in the rage demonstrated by the NBA and NAACP spokespeople.
These seem to me hallmarks of the conservative way of thinking.
Being more conservative than some, I think they did a fine job. I'm just surprised no liberal is concerned about the methods used to slam him. Are you suggesting that Sterling's human rights aren't important, regardless of whether it's a criminal or civil issue?