Climate Change Report

[cwolff]

Leave my steak alone, you fucking twats.

As part of its plan to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Obama administration is targeting the dairy industry to reduce methane emissions in their operations.

This comes despite falling methane emission levels across the economy since 1990.

The White House has proposed cutting methane emissions from the dairy industry by 25 percent by 2020. Although U.S. agriculture only accounts for about 9 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, it makes up a sizeable portion of methane emissions — which is a very potent greenhouse gas.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/28/wh...#ixzz2xYQQV6Jd

Your steaks don't come from dairy farms.

[Parkbandit]

You're letting your emotions get the best of you. It's clouding you ability to reason.

[Parkbandit]

All I do is reason. But I've since given up trying to reason with idealogues.

http://www.petitionproject.org/

The debate is OVER.

98% of all the smart scientists say that man causes global warming, er.. global cooling, er... global climate change.

Get the fuck back in line.

[cwolff]

The debate is OVER.

98% of all the smart scientists say that man causes global warming, er.. global cooling, er... global climate change.

Get the fuck back in line.

More positive proof that you still don't understand the topic. Come on man. It's not that hard. You sound like the Donald questioning global warming because the east coast had a cold Winter. Do you really want to echo the Donald?

[Jarvan]

More positive proof that you still don't understand the topic. Come on man. It's not that hard. You sound like the Donald questioning global warming because the east coast had a cold Winter. Do you really want to echo the Donald?

You know.. I always thought winters were SUPPOSED to be Cold.

Face it.. as of right now, they can say anything they want, and be covered in any eventuality.

They say... "The Earth is warming.. but that doesn't mean your area will be warmer, it may be cooler. Weather patterns will change, but you may not see a change. Blizzards the likes we haven't seen for decades may hit, but maybe not in your area. But trust us, this IS happening, we just won't say WHERE it will happen, because we are not 100% sure where it will happen exactly, we just know somewhere at some time, it will"

It's like getting a Nobel Prize for saying that there will be more Earthquakes, and some may happen somewhere at some point. So we should be prepared.

The best part is when all these Global Warming "religious" fanatics predict something... it doesn't happen, and then they go.. "that doesn't disprove what I said".

Yet people like Cwolff think Religious people are nuts for saying something similar about God.

[Latrinsorm]

Face it.. as of right now, they can say anything they want, and be covered in any eventuality.

You do not understand the claims of climate change.

[Parkbandit]

More positive proof that you still don't understand the topic. Come on man. It's not that hard. You sound like the Donald questioning global warming because the east coast had a cold Winter. Do you really want to echo the Donald?

Yes. That is exactly what I was saying.

I've already told you: WB has the market cornered on making shit up and hoping no one calls him on it. Let's leave that to him... it's all he has here.

Why don't you just continue to be you: Post any idiotic Democrat talking points you can find and defend it no matter what. That is your thing.

[cwolff]

Yes. That is exactly what I was saying.

I've already told you: WB has the market cornered on making shit up and hoping no one calls him on it. Let's leave that to him... it's all he has here.

Why don't you just continue to be you: Post any idiotic Democrat talking points you can find and defend it no matter what. That is your thing.

Is it? I mean, I understand why there are variations in weather patterns. I'm not the guy who see it's snowing and says "HA, So much for global warming". Are you? Either way it's not a democrat or republican issue. In this folder you should probably attack me for defending the best understandings that science has today about climate change. That'd be more accurate.

[NinjasLeadTheWay]

Is it? I mean, I understand why there are variations in weather patterns. I'm not the guy who see it's snowing and says "HA, So much for global warming". Are you? Either way it's not a democrat or republican issue. In this folder you should probably attack me for defending the best understandings that science has today about climate change. That'd be more accurate.

But...but...but you ignored all of my facts from NOAA and the IPCC, the graphs and models and science that clearly show changes in CO2 has nothing to do with global warming. You are the sworn enemy of facts when you accept the IPCC report at face value without checking the data for yourself. And the data shows LAND USE and the Urban Heat Island Effect have had more effect on climate data, but not actual climate, than anything to this day. As for actual changes in the climate, well shit, it's nothing special going on that hasn't gone on long before we were an industrialized planet. LOOK AT ICE CORE SAMPLES!!!! GOD DAMN IT!!! WHY THE FUCK DO WE REHASH THIS EVERY OTHER WEEK?!

[cwolff]

But...but...but you ignored all of my facts from NOAA and the IPCC, the graphs and models and science that clearly show changes in CO2 has nothing to do with global warming. You are the sworn enemy of facts when you accept the IPCC report at face value without checking the data for yourself. And the data shows LAND USE and the Urban Heat Island Effect have had more effect on climate data, but not actual climate, than anything to this day. As for actual changes in the climate, well shit, it's nothing special going on that hasn't gone on long before we were an industrialized planet. LOOK AT ICE CORE SAMPLES!!!! GOD DAMN IT!!! WHY THE FUCK DO WE REHASH THIS EVERY OTHER WEEK?!

We didn't ignore your graphs we refuted them and told you to read the report which addresses your concerns.

Why would I read an entire report when the entire first paragraph is bullshit? That doesn't speak to the credibility of the rest of the document. It's not worth my time to read the drivel that mirrors the usual bullshit.

There seems to be some misconception about the effects of global warming/climate change. The Earth is not in trouble. Life here will go on. Humans are in trouble. Slight changes in the environment can mean big changes for large populations. CO2 may be good for plants; changing the chemistry of the atmosphere is not good for mammals.

The references and grabs you posted are either incorrect, a small part of the bigger story or just blatantly misinterpreted to fit your belief system. Just read the link you posted about sea ice. You cherry picked one paragraph to support your ideas but half that article is explaining the phenomena and it's not a pretty picture. Heat islands weren't just ignored to make the math work. They were accounted for and they don't have an effect on total global warming since most of the earth is water and open land. The ocean increased .32 degrees fahrenheit. Do you have any idea how hard it is to warm that much water?

The ideas you presented are addressed in the NAS report. You should read it. At least it will give you information to try to refute.