More Obamacare fuckups

[Warriorbird]

Our justice system was set up to let guilty men go free if that means not punishing the innocent. Why do you think it is that the defense can appeal, but the prosecution cannot, no matter what happens?

It was set up pretty purposefully that way. One of the people who's ideas influenced it was one of the people who's considered a founder of modern conservative thought, Edmund Burke. He wanted to stand against radical liberal misuse of the death penalty (ala Revolutionary France.)

Sort of stands against some of the "KILL THEM ALL" ranting.

[Ravenwood]

That's cause the message is almost certainly a lie.

But even if that ONE message is true, what would you have to say about the hundreds against Obamacare... nothing most likely. Or they are lying.

Just give up Cwolff. We all know you are the poster child for Us vrs Them.

So you would rather a mass murdering psychopath that WILL rape and kill more little kids goes free, then an innocent gets punished?

Frankly.. if I got the death penalty for something I didn't do, I would fight it, but if I KNEW that a criminal like that wouldn't go free even tho I was gana die, I would be ok with it.

Well spoken, You are a man of integrity and honor.Liberals only claim to grasp those concepts when it suits their agendas to do so.

[Warriorbird]

Well spoken, You are a man of integrity and honor.Liberals only claim to grasp those concepts when it suits their agendas to do so.

Our non double jeopardy/frequent appeal system was set up largely due to the influence of conservative responses to the French Revolution.

[cwolff]

Im sure it has happened and I feel for the families and for those who have had to pay such a high price for our safety and right to live.

But is sures beats the alternative and is a small price in comparison. A handful of somewhat innocent lives (they had to have done something in order to facilitate this mistaken identity and end up on death row in the first place) versus the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent people simply trying to exist peacefully with the rest of us?

Seems a no-brainer to me.

So morally speaking, it's ok to kill people. The key is if it's for a greater good. If you kill someone for their wallet you get killed. If you kill someone because you thought they killed someone for their wallet; that's just bad luck.

[Ravenwood]

I'm not advocating for the cessation of society or executing criminals. Generally speaking I do believe it's better that some criminals get away if it means no innocents are mistakenly punished.

With the advent of modern DNA testing and much more sophisticated forensics, the chances of an innocent man being executed are much less than any of us dying in a plane crash or being struck by lightning.

Once again, liberal hypocrisy shows. You accuse conservatives of living in the past and being outdated and old fashioned but it seems thats okay when it furthers your own arguments.

[cwolff]

Well spoken, You are a man of integrity and honor.Liberals only claim to grasp those concepts when it suits their agendas to do so.

Wow, I get it now. Ravenwood is doing the Clyder thing with the satire. RW's the Colbert to Clyde's Stewart. Too funny.

[Warriorbird]

Wow, I get it now. Ravenwood is doing the Clyder thing with the satire. RW's the Colbert to Clyde's Stewart. Too funny.

He's done it before. I tried to take it seriously because I definitely don't want it to be the poster I imagine it is.

[Ravenwood]

So morally speaking, it's ok to kill people. The key is if it's for a greater good. If you kill someone for their wallet you get killed. If you kill someone because you thought they killed someone for their wallet; that's just bad luck.

We arent talking about peoples wallets. Were talking about taking the lives of people who would rape, murder and molest your family and not even feel bad about it. Even as morally bankrupt as most liberals are, surely you must understand why this is necessary.

In supporting these kinds of criminals you choose death over life, evil over good and wrong over right. Period

[cwolff]

He's done it before. I tried to take it seriously because I definitely don't want it to be the poster I imagine it is.

It's a little PC mystery. Is it satire or reinforcement?

[Warriorbird]

It's a little PC mystery. Is it satire or reinforcement?

It's a weird position to be in to hope it actually is a Republican.