
Originally Posted by
Jarvan
It's funny. (I know both sides do it but still) Isn't the President's job, and in fact he is sworn under oath to do, is uphold the laws of this land? So why is it when the Republicans say lets change or do away with it, it's the "Law of the Land" but when he needs to do something to save face, help out a key voting block, or not utterly destroy the economy BEFORE mid-terms, it's perfectly ok to not uphold the law?
I don't see actually how he can just choose to "not enforce" one aspect of the law, yet enforce another. It would be like a DA not prosecuting bank robbers for armed robber, but ticketing them for jay walking to their get away car.