Justice for Hire - SCOTUS

[Tgo01]

Is it though? Recusal is at theater discretion of the judge or by motion of a moving party.

So let me get this straight, recusal is at the discretion of the judge so therefore it can't possibly be corruption, even though she was getting money from this publisher and this publisher had business before the court and therefore benefited from said financial transaction?

But accepting gifts from close personal friends (and at the time it was also discretionary to report it), who don't have business before the court so they can't benefit from said gifts, is corruption?

Seran, just save everyone some time and say "LOL! Thomas is a black conservative so therefore GUILTY! Sotomayor is a Democrat so therefore INNOCENT!"

You must be frying what's left of your tiny brain trying to make sense out of defending Sotomayor's actual corruption and attacking Thomas when clearly there is no corruption.

[Suppressed Poet]

Is it though? Recusal is at theater discretion of the judge or by motion of a moving party. Justice Sotomayor has a public relationship and business relationship which she disclosed compensation from book sales annually. Meanwhile, Justice Thomas hid his relationship with Billionaire Harlan Crow, failed to disclose the relationship at the time the relevant hearing was where recusal was in question, and hid hundreds of thousands, or millions in money, compensation or gifts paid directly to him or indirectly through his wife, household and family. So yeah, you clearly don't understand the difference.

Your outrage is quite selective.

[Parkbandit]

Your outrage is quite retarded.

FTFY.

Selective denotes an intelligence behind it.. as if he were capable of making a decision.

He's not.

He's outraged at whatever MSNBC tells him he is outraged about.

[Seran]

So let me get this straight, recusal is at the discretion of the judge so therefore it can't possibly be corruption, even though she was getting money from this publisher and this publisher had business before the court and therefore benefited from said financial transaction?

But accepting gifts from close personal friends (and at the time it was also discretionary to report it), who don't have business before the court so they can't benefit from said gifts, is corruption?

Seran, just save everyone some time and say "LOL! Thomas is a black conservative so therefore GUILTY! Sotomayor is a Democrat so therefore INNOCENT!"

You must be frying what's left of your tiny brain trying to make sense out of defending Sotomayor's actual corruption and attacking Thomas when clearly there is no corruption.

I mean it's pretty clear your political bias doesn't allow you to see the difference between the two circumstances, but if you're not even going to try what's the point?

[Methais]

I mean it's pretty clear your political bias doesn't allow you to see the difference between the two circumstances, but if you're not even going to try what's the point?

[Parkbandit]

I mean it's pretty clear your political bias doesn't allow you to see the difference between the two circumstances, but if you're not even going to try what's the point?

Jesus fucking Christ..

[Tgo01]

Uh-oh! It turns out several current and former Democrat justices also went on vacations and accepted other lavish gifts from Democrat mega donors.

Former Democrat justice Breyer went on 219 said vacations during his time on the court.

Remember one of my first posts in this thread said this would end up being a nothing burger, we just had to wait few weeks for the the truth to come out?

Yeah. Looks like I was right yet again. Whenever Democrats are onto their newest outrage remember to ignore them for several weeks until the facts come out.

[Parkbandit]

Uh-oh! It turns out several current and former Democrat justices also went on vacations and accepted other lavish gifts from Democrat mega donors.

Former Democrat justice Breyer went on 219 said vacations during his time on the court.

Remember one of my first posts in this thread said this would end up being a birthing burger, we just had to wait few weeks for the the truth to come out?

Yeah. Looks like I was right yet again. Whenever Democrats are onto their newest outrage remember to ignore them for several weeks until the facts come out.

Are they black and don't toe the Democrat line?

No?

Then they don't count.

[Seran]

Uh-oh! It turns out several current and former Democrat justices also went on vacations and accepted other lavish gifts from Democrat mega donors.

Former Democrat justice Breyer went on 219 said vacations during his time on the court.

Remember one of my first posts in this thread said this would end up being a nothing burger, we just had to wait few weeks for the the truth to come out?

Yeah. Looks like I was right yet again. Whenever Democrats are onto their newest outrage remember to ignore them for several weeks until the facts come out.

Source or it didn't happen.

[Parkbandit]

Source or it didn't happen.

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...or-Hire-SCOTUS