Things that you have taken seriously today (Political version)

[Shaps]

Person B has a higher transmission rate, increasing risk to Person A.

Person B is 29 times more likely to require hospitalization, utilizing beds and services Person A may require.

Person B is more likely to develop a mutated virus, with which to make the vaccine of Person A less effective.

Person B is squandering medical resources for an illness largely preventable by a free vaccine.

Person A is sick of Person B arguing their freedom gives them the right to infect others.

Person B is a horrible person.

In order:

Person A is vaccinated - your point is mute - because you say the vaccine works.

That is on Person B, they are taking the risk. Hospitals use resources for all types of things, and dumb decisions of people. Should a hospital turn away all drug/drinking cases on a weekend night? I mean.. they're taking up resources that person A may require right?

To claim vaccinated vs. unvaccinated is more prone for a mutated virus - I believe hasn't been proven? But historically, you know why viruses mutate? Because we develop vaccines and they mutate to adjust for them. So link some data if you're going to make that claim.

All people squander all types of medical resources for all types of shit... please see my earlier post regarding medical issues people have based upon personal choices... which you tried to brush aside.

Person B is sick of Person A arguing that they should take orders about their personal health from strangers or government administrators. You don't know what an individuals situation is... and claiming you know what's best for them is bullshit.

Person A is fine. Person B is fine. Jackasses like you? Not so much.


I'll say one last time... Listen to your personal physicians and do what is best for your health. Be respectful and cognizant of your surroundings. And otherwise tell people like the above to fuck off.

[Seran]

In order:

Person A is vaccinated - your point is mute - because you say the vaccine works.

That is on Person B, they are taking the risk. Hospitals use resources for all types of things, and dumb decisions of people. Should a hospital turn away all drug/drinking cases on a weekend night? I mean.. they're taking up resources that person A may require right?

To claim vaccinated vs. unvaccinated is more prone for a mutated virus - I believe hasn't been proven? But historically, you know why viruses mutate? Because we develop vaccines and they mutate to adjust for them. So link some data if you're going to make that claim.

All people squander all types of medical resources for all types of shit... please see my earlier post regarding medical issues people have based upon personal choices... which you tried to brush aside.

Person B is sick of Person A arguing that they should take orders about their personal health from strangers or government administrators. You don't know what an individuals situation is... and claiming you know what's best for them is bullshit.

Person A is fine. Person B is fine. Jackasses like you? Not so much.


I'll say one last time... Listen to your personal physicians and do what is best for your health. Be respectful and cognizant of your surroundings. And otherwise tell people like the above to fuck off.

Person B isn't listening to their physician, they're believing every crackpot Fox News theory about self determination and making everyone else ill around this. You're a fucking retarded if you think vaccines are 100% effective too.

[Tgo01]

Person B isn't listening to their physician, they're believing every crackpot Fox News theory about self determination and making everyone else ill around this. You're a fucking retarded if you think vaccines are 100% effective too.

Person B doesn't listen to their physician and doesn't quit smoking.

Seran: Let Person B die.

[Seran]

Person B doesn't listen to their physician and doesn't quit smoking.

Seran: Let Person B die.

Do you seriously do anything but hyperbole?

[Tgo01]

Do you seriously do anything but hyperbole?

Should that person die? I mean he's taking a bed and squandering medical resources.

[Seran]

Should that person die? I mean he's taking a bed and squandering medical resources.

Did I say that? No. You're literally making shit up like you always do. Someone who smokes /may/ wind up in the hospital, with any number of ailments which are treatable, maybe not curable. But antibiotics, oxygen, even most cancer treatments aren't supply limited

Monoclonal antibodies are very supply limited. As a result of supply being outstripped by demand, the supply is being apportioned to states. Period. Bitch and moan all you want, but it's an incredibly reasonable maneuver.

[Tgo01]

Did I say that? No.

Oh right, you just defend people who say those people should die and you somehow think it's Group A's business what medical procedures Group B decides they do or do not want because they are taking up a hospital bed and "squandering" medical resources.

Don't act like your shit don't stink. You're just barely stopping short of saying let those people die.

[Parkbandit]

You're a fucking retarded if you think vaccines are 100% effective too.

This explains everything you need to know about Seran.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

As a result of supply being outstripped by demand, the supply is being apportioned to states. Period.

By this argument we should stop shipping water to California. Or firefighters.

And avocados from Mexico.

[Shaps]

Man.. with this new logic.. Perhaps Colorado and Utah should damn up the Colorado River.. they are having water shortages themselves, and the natural resource is in their land mass. Wonder how that would go over in California... but it does fit this new logic.