Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

[RichardCranium]

You know the histories of the people that were part of the crowd? Are you part of Latrin's Universal Surveillance Team, or are you just grasping at straws to victim blame and justify a terrible act?

This is probably the best point anyone has made. If Latrin were President this would have never happened because universal surveillance.

[Neveragain]

No, it's not 'OK.' Just like J-walking isn't 'ok.'

Neither instance affords me the right to use my car as a battering ram however.

Now it's my turn to ask a ludicrous question that we both know the answer to:

If I happen to buy a tank, can I just run it through the public library because of my right to unrestricted free movement?

You and your comrades argument is "how big of a weapon is acceptable for an act of violence?" not what protected rights are being violated that lead to the acts of violence. Is throwing a rock at someone an acceptable form of response to speech you don't like? Or is a tank the line for which we say that's too extreme of a violent response?

Both sides are guilty of acts of violence. Both sides espouse ideology that is anti-freedom. This woman is not a hero or a victim, she was part of the problem.

[Androidpk]

You and your comrades argument is "how big of a weapon is acceptable for an act of violence?" not what protected rights are being violated that lead to the acts of violence. Is throwing a rock at someone an acceptable form of response to speech you don't like? Or is a tank the line for which we say that's too extreme of a violent response?

Both sides are guilty of acts of violence. Both sides espouse ideology that is anti-freedom. This woman is not a hero or a victim, she was part of the problem.

Please never stop being such an obvious moron for all to mock.

[Pin]

You and your comrades argument is "how big of a weapon is acceptable for an act of violence?" not what protected rights are being violated that lead to the acts of violence. Is throwing a rock at someone an acceptable form of response to speech you don't like? Or is a tank the line for which we say that's too extreme of a violent response?

Both sides are guilty of acts of violence. Both sides espouse ideology that is anti-freedom. This woman is not a hero or a victim, she was part of the problem.

We are useing motorized vehicles in our examples because that is quite literally what was used in the attack in Virginia.

I don't see an answer to my question, so I'll ask again - can I ram my tank through a public building, or does my unrestricted movement maybe have some restrictions on it after all?

[Neveragain]

Please never stop being such an obvious moron for all to mock.

Was it OK for ANTIFA and BLM to throw rocks and pepper spray white nationalists that obtained the proper permits to assemble?

[Androidpk]

Was it OK for ANTIFA and BLM to throw rocks and pepper spray white nationalists that obtained the proper permits to assemble?

Totally justifies murdering someone.

[Neveragain]

Of course you can't, a public library is not public property designed for the movement of said tank. A public roadway is designed for just that purpose.

Is it OK to barricade your driveway because I don't like you?

[Neveragain]

Totally justifies murdering someone.

You can't kill someone by throwing a rock at them?

[Pin]

Of course you can't, a public library is not public property designed for the movement of said tank. A public roadway is designed for just that purpose.

So wait I'm confused- how can I have the right to free unrestricted movement if the 'government' of all things can tell me where I can and can not go with its 'roads?'

[Androidpk]

You can't kill someone by throwing a rock at them?

How many people in Charlottesville died that day because of a rock thrown at them?