Dumb things conservatives say:

[Tgo01]

There's quite a difference between censorship and allowing Super PACs. I'd think you'd be smart enough to see that, but you never can tell.

Where in my quote did you see the words "Super PACs"? It said "corporations."

Where in my post does it even talk about disallowing any sort of entity? It quite plainly said "prohibiting such entities from spending money to influence elections."

[Warriorbird]

Where in my quote did you see the words "Super PACs"? It said "corporations."

Where in my post does it even talk about disallowing any sort of entity? It quite plainly said "prohibiting such entities from spending money to influence elections."

It's okay that you don't understand the issue. Someday you'll maybe put in some further study.

[Tgo01]

It's okay that you don't understand the issue. Someday you'll maybe put in some further study.

.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..............................

I've never seen someone be so condescending while being so obviously wrong at the same time. Mad props, WB.

[Parkbandit]

As often as you comprehend them.

[Parkbandit]

.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..............................

I've never seen someone be so condescending while being so obviously wrong at the same time. Mad props, WB.

Have you missed his other political posts? It's a common theme.

[Back]

I will say one thing. Ted Cruz is a good troll.

[Warriorbird]

.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..............................

I've never seen someone be so condescending while being so obviously wrong at the same time. Mad props, WB.

Critical thinking time.

Why exactly are super PACs problematic? Why is unlimited corporate donations a problem?

You know that you and Cruz are purposefully trying to conflate the issue so your claims are staggering.

Add most of your entire posting history to the condescending category if it's suddenly an issue to you.

[Tgo01]

Critical thinking time.

Why exactly are super PACs problematic? Why is unlimited corporate donations a problem?

You know that you and Cruz are purposefully trying to conflate the issue so your claims are staggering.

No, you're just simply refusing to believe what your own eyes are reading.

This would be akin to trying to battle domestic violence by making domestic partnerships illegal altogether.

The way this legislation is written is like using an anvil when a screwdriver would do the job.

If this was all just about Super PACs then why does the legislation say Congress will have the power of "prohibiting such entities (corporations) from spending money to influence elections"?

Corporations could always spend money on elections because it was viewed as free speech. Now you're basically cheering Congress along for wanting to violate free speech under the guise of "Sticking it to them Super PACs!"

This is mind boggling on so many levels.

Everyone should be concerned when Congress can decide to silence large segments of our population on a whim but apparently as long as they "promise" they are just doing this to go after Super PACs then it's okay.



Follow the leader, now.

[Warriorbird]

No, you're just simply refusing to believe what your own eyes are reading.

This would be akin to trying to battle domestic violence by making domestic partnerships illegal altogether.

The way this legislation is written is like using an anvil when a screwdriver would do the job.

If this was all just about Super PACs then why does the legislation say Congress will have the power of "prohibiting such entities (corporations) from spending money to influence elections"?

Corporations could always spend money on elections because it was viewed as free speech. Now you're basically cheering Congress along for wanting to violate free speech under the guise of "Sticking it to them Super PACs!"

This is mind boggling on so many levels.

Everyone should be concerned when Congress can decide to silence large segments of our population on a whim but apparently as long as they "promise" they are just doing this to go after Super PACs then it's okay.



Follow the leader, now.

You are. You're going with Ted Cruz's censorship line when it isn't there. Pretty simple.

[Methais]

What if they outlaw corporations from making campaign contributions and then say that since Mitt Romney said corporations are people too, that means people can't make campaign contributions either?

WHICH LEAVES ONLY UNIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111