Clinton Emails

[Jarvan]

Is this going to be a game changer?

Or will the Dems and most Media act like this is nothing at all?

Dems already are seemingly brushing it off...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/us...ards.html?_r=0

I don't know how the media will react, I heard the AP could possibly be suing her.

[Androidpk]

Another right wing conspiracy to discredit Hillary.

/s

[waywardgs]

Why is this important? Security concerns or something?

[Androidpk]

Why is this important? Security concerns or something?

Security and transparency concerns.

[waywardgs]

Security and transparency concerns.

Yeah, just read the articles. Yeah, she should have been using a gov acct. Will it matter? Not in the slightest.

[Tgo01]

Yeah, just read the articles. Yeah, she should have been using a gov acct. Will it matter? Not in the slightest.

I was gonna say it's stupid that she won't get fired for this but like, she already quit so there really isn't much that can be done in that regard. But this made me realize something strange; why is it those appointed to political positions seem to not really care about their jobs compared to those who were voted in?

For example: hasn't Obama replaced like 20 top administration officials since he was sworn in, only a handful were forced to resign? Bush had similar numbers. The others were just like "Okay, 3 years is enough for me, CYA!" or "Oh shit a scandal? Okay, I'll just quit."

Yet if there is a scandal involving an elected official they will usually fight tooth and nail to keep their job, the only notable exception of course is Nixon.

[waywardgs]

I was gonna say it's stupid that she won't get fired for this but like, she already quit so there really isn't much that can be done in that regard. But this made me realize something strange; why is it those appointed to political positions seem to not really care about their jobs compared to those who were voted in?

For example: hasn't Obama replaced like 20 top administration officials since he was sworn in, only a handful were forced to resign? Bush had similar numbers. The others were just like "Okay, 3 years is enough for me, CYA!" or "Oh shit a scandal? Okay, I'll just quit."

Yet if there is a scandal involving an elected official they will usually fight tooth and nail to keep their job, the only notable exception of course is Nixon.

It's pretty typical. These positions are generally stepping stones for something else. No one is going to risk everything on a job if it means hamstringing themselves in an election down the road.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah, just read the articles. Yeah, she should have been using a gov acct. Will it matter? Not in the slightest.

I think it's a bigger deal than what it's being made in the MSM, but I agree.. won't matter in the slightest. I am surprised by the outrage from some on the left.. clearly they are hoping it hurts Clinton enough for someone else to run.

[Parkbandit]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video...email-29397129

Plus a Stan Lee sighting!

[Jarvan]

Why is this important? Security concerns or something?

Well.. if EVERY single email she did was from her personal account, and they ALL were stored on her private server in her house, there HAD to be classified emails. Which means she did the same thing as Petraeus. Not to mention the fact that NONE of these emails were turned over during the 7 subpena's she received for Benghazi.

So yes.. it could be a big deal.