FBI raid on Trump's home

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

White people trust three letter organizations too readily.

Like BLM?

edit to add: oh dang, I was too late. Here are some more white people should trust less?

NIH?
CDC?
ABC?
NBC?
CBS?
CNN?
FOX?
IRS?
WHO?
ICE?

[Astray]

Like BLM?

edit to add: oh dang, I was too late. Here are some more white people should trust less?

NIH?
CDC?
ABC?
NBC?
CBS?
CNN?
FOX?
IRS?
WHO?
ICE?

Never trust Whitey. It never goes well. Not even for them!

[drumpel]

Never trust Whitey. It never goes well. Not even for them!

[Parkbandit]

That's racist, by Law of Surprise.

LoS seems pretty trustworthy.

[Parkbandit]

Never trust Whitey. It never goes well. Not even for them!

NTW seems legit.

[Parkbandit]

Has nothing to do with what is or isn't public record, classified national security documents are protected by attorney client privilege or the Trump teams pipe dream that Trump has executive privilege. They're documents produced by the executive branch, owned by the Federal government, and illegally in the possession of a citizen. Executive privilege doesn't apply, thus a special master to review classified materials needn't be appointed. The DOJ has attempted to meet in the middle, allowing a special master of non classified information such as Trump's memos from his advisors, which is an incredibly relevant carve out.

You made a great deal of assumptions here.

Let the legal system work itself out. If President Trump did something wrong, let him face the consequences. If he didn't, you will still rage and carry on like the mouthbreathing retard you are.

Either way, you are very upset about the Special Master being appointed.. so given your track record, that seems like that is the way to go.

[Gelston]

Has nothing to do with what is or isn't public record, classified national security documents are protected by attorney client privilege or the Trump teams pipe dream that Trump has executive privilege. They're documents produced by the executive branch, owned by the Federal government, and illegally in the possession of a citizen. Executive privilege doesn't apply, thus a special master to review classified materials needn't be appointed. The DOJ has attempted to meet in the middle, allowing a special master of non classified information such as Trump's memos from his advisors, which is an incredibly relevant carve out.

It is 100% about what is on public record. Courts in the US are built on transparency. This one, since it possibly involves classified documents and that is a key part of the case, cannot be. We couldn't even see 90% of the warrant information. You can jam your ears and scream as loud as you want, but you know this is true.

You are the one trying to compare this to a GTA case, yet in a GTA case, the entire warrant and court documents would be visible to the entire public.

[Seran]

It is 100% about what is on public record. Courts in the US are built on transparency. This one, since it possibly involves classified documents and that is a key part of the case, cannot be. We couldn't even see 90% of the warrant information. You can jam your ears and scream as loud as you want, but you know this is true.

You are the one trying to compare this to a GTA case, yet in a GTA case, the entire warrant and court documents would be visible to the entire public.

The judge doesn't distinguish between unclassified memorandum and classified documents not subject to any privilege claim in her order, which grants a hypothetical special master entirely too much control over a rapidly evolving situation with massive national security implications. The DOJ argument is for the judge to not try and overreach by hindering intelligence agencies from protecting our country. Sorry that you don't see the difference between protecting our country and protecting a criminal.

[Methais]

The judge doesn't distinguish between unclassified memorandum and classified documents not subject to any privilege claim in her order, which grants a hypothetical special master entirely too much control over a rapidly evolving situation with massive national security implications. The DOJ argument is for the judge to not try and overreach by hindering intelligence agencies from protecting our country. Sorry that you don't see the difference between protecting our country and protecting a criminal.

As a woman, how does that make you feel?

[Shaps]

Trump in jail yet? No?

Be back in a couple weeks for a checkup on how it's going.