"Unfortunately for the president, these writings are no more correct than the spelling in his original tweet. And in light of the president's apparent embrace of Calabresi's conclusions, it is well worth taking a close look at Calabresi's argument in support of those conclusions," he writes.
Calabresi has argued that Mueller's probe is "null and void" because it violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2.
"The 'constitutional' arguments made against the special counsel do not meet that standard and had little more rigor than the tweet that promoted them. Such a lack of rigor, sadly, has been a disturbing trend in much of the politically charged public discourse about the law lately, and one that lawyers - regardless of their politics - owe a duty to abjure," Conway said.