Spoiler Alert: The next paragraph of the article you quoted -- which you conveniently didn't continue with -- says: "but there is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."
Not only is there absolutely no evidence that anyone in the Clinton campaign spread the birther nonsense, the "evidence" the Trump campaign tried to cite in favor of it never brings up anything remotely relevant. And more than that,
even if you
could somehow demonstrate that Clinton was responsible for it, she never touted the issue -- unlike Trump, who literally conned retarded conservatives about it on Twitter for years.
Your own mostly-delusional article confirms the IPAB -- which
still wasn't "a death panel" -- never had a single appointment. All IPAB had the power to do, even if it had been filled, was to make recommendations to Congress. If anything, opposition to IPAB demonstrates the hypocrisy that supposedly "fiscally conservative" Republicans have.
Ooh! How
inconvenient for you --
Trump's handpicked NASA administrator, himself a climate change skeptic Republican congressman from Oklahoma appointed in April -- just announced that he now understands and accepts climate science:
NASA administrator Bridenstein, testifying before Congress:
“The National Climate Assessment, that includes NASA, and it includes the Department of Energy, and it includes NOAA, has clearly stated it is extremely likely, [that] is the language they use, that human activity is the dominant cause of global warming, and I have no reason to doubt the science that comes from that.” Bridenstine said.
Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii): “Is it fair to call this an evolution of your views?”
Bridenstine: “Yes.”
Source.
Too bad "collusion" has already been established, by Trump Jr's own admission on Twitter, no less. Did you forget about the 70+ criminal charges that have been filed, resulting in a half-dozen guilty pleas already? Stay tuned, my delusional friend.
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote