Exhausting Court Proceedings on the Horizon

[Neveragain]

I do not take everything Snopes says at face value.

For this particular rumor, I believe there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the rumor is true. See? I disagree with Snopes.

Things must be going really well for the prosecution if fags, like you, are focusing on farts.

Must be serious.

[Parkbandit]

I do not take everything Snopes says at face value.

Trump farted and didn't let me sniff it! All I want to do is bury my face in his ass and have him fart on me.

OK.

[~Rocktar~]

For 30 years, Snopes has been the recognized authority to confirm or quelch internet rumors. Snopes has labeled "unproven" the rumors accusing Trump of, um, an unacceptable degree of ventosity in the courtroom.

https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/statu...80399698002206

One, you think Snopes is reliable. It's a couple, now divorced, sitting on their couch doing a minor amount of confirmation biased research on the internet.

Two.

ErMaHgeRd4!!!! Trump riPPed one in COURT! We GoT Him NAO! JoUrNaLiSmSs!




Sorry, just can't put in enough commas. I tried.

[Suppressed Poet]

LOL @ MSNBC

[Methais]

One, you think Snopes is reliable. It's a couple, now divorced, sitting on their couch doing a minor amount of confirmation biased research on the internet.

Two.

ErMaHgeRd4!!!! Trump riPPed one in COURT! We GoT Him NAO! JoUrNaLiSmSs!




Sorry, just can't put in enough commas. I tried.

Next they'll post a "secret recording" and dub this over it and Seran and ClydeRetard will belive them:

[Parkbandit]

Next they'll post a "secret recording" and dub this over it and Seran and ClydeRetard will belive them:

If there are two people who are super qualified to sniff this story out, it's our Dynamic Retard Duo of sErAn and ClydeR (hard R)

[Seran]

Drowsy Donald strikes again.

[Methais]

I believe everything I hear a's long a's I agree with it.

This is correct.

[ClydeR]

The Gross Up.

Just as I predicted, the gross up will be an issue in Trump's criminal trial. Both the prosecution and the defense mentioned it in their opening statements.

The prosecution..

The bank statement that I told you about that he asked Cohen to bring to their meeting, the from the bank statement from Essential Consultants LLC account, which showed the $130, 000 wire that Cohen had made to Keith Davidson to keep Stormy Daniels quiet; you will see in this trial, Allen Wisselberg's handwriting down the side of that bank statement laying out every one of the steps that I just described, showing how they converted the $130, 000 payoff mount to he 420 grand that Cohen was going to get paid back, as a grossed up way to disguise it, not as a reimbursement, but as income.

Cohen and Weisselberg then met with Trump, who approved that repayment amount of 420 grand on the $130, 000 Stormy Daniels payment and a few others expenses.

The defense..

But, think for a moment of what the People just told you. President Trump did not pay Mr. Cohen back $130,000. President Trump paid Michael Cohen $420,000.

And in the same breath, the People told you that President Trump is known as a frugal businessman, that he pinches pennies.

Ask yourself: Would a frugal businessman, would a man who pinches pennies repay $130, 000 debt to the tune of $420,000?

More significantly than that, ladies and gentlemen, you're going to learn that this was not payback. The $35, 000 a month was not a payback to Mr. Cohen for the money that he gave to Ms. Daniels.

He was President Trump's personal attorney.

Based on what you've known for years about the Stormy Daniels hush money, do you already know who is telling the truth even before the participants testify at the trial in the coming days? Do you already know whether or not it was a payback?

Trial transcripts will be posted by the court system daily on the day following the testimony at the below link. They're in pdf but not pdf text, which is dumb.
https://ww2.nycourts.gov/people-v-do...criminal-37026 --click "Transcripts"

[Suppressed Poet]

Based on what you've known for years about the Stormy Daniels hush money, do you already know who is telling the truth even before the participants testify at the trial in the coming days?

I’m glad you asked. The answer is a resounding yes.