Michigan DA politicizing school shooting tragedy by charging parents

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

If a child steals a pack of gum at the grocery store, should the parents go to jail for shoplifting?

---

What world do you live in that it makes sense to compare these two things AT ALL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Realk

What world do you live in that it makes sense to compare these two things AT ALL.

---

Bro...

It's ClydeR.

He's not here to make sense.

He's here to pretend he speaks for conservatives, but in actuality he's a leftist nutjob who has been pretending to be something he's not since 2007 because before that, he was made fun of for having extremist views and it hurt his feelings so badly, he created this login.

Just treat him as the cowardly troll he's always been.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Well this certainly is strange. Gosh, I can't possibly imagine why this bit of evidence wasn't included in the DA's announcement of her political charges against the parents.

Suspect 'appeared calm' | Oxford High School releases their account of deadly shooting



Well that's strange. So the "trained professionals" (the superintendent's words) concluded the shooter appeared calm and did not pose a threat to himself and others and that's why they let him go back to class and yet the parents, who I am assuming are not trained mental health professionals, were somehow supposed to know he was a danger to himself or others?

The DA better pull some amazing evidence out of her ass that the parents knew more than the school or else these charges are complete bullshit and just reek of a political agenda.

Also apparently the principal and assistant principal weren't made aware of the actions that day and this was all handled by the guidance counselor, according to the superintendent.

That article also has the timeline of events regarding when the shooting took place, the text from the mother, and the 911 call from the father:



From what I have read police responded and arrested the shooter about 5 minutes after the shooting started, so the mother's message came over 20 minutes after the shooting had already stopped. That certainly doesn't sound like she knew beforehand the shooting was going to happen and sounds more like she was trying to get him to stop once she put the pieces together.

Also the father is the one who called police to say his gun was missing and that his son is most likely the shooter.

Again the DA better have some evidence other than the bullshit she pulled out of her ass during her news conference.

---

Did anyone else see an article about the Mother posting (or tweeting) something the Friday before about spending time with her son "Playing" with his new Christmas toy?
Or - a teacher's snapshot of a note found on his desktop (the day before or the day of?) showing some sort of gruesome scene with the written words "Help Me?"

If true, could either be indicative of intent?

I haven't followed this case cause I don't follow the news in general. I hope that in time the truth comes out and we find out what the parents knew and when. It just seems to me, like the Sandy Hook and Parkland, things were missed, glossed over or worse yet, hidden and so the tools we have to head off or help these kinda of kids aren't working.

I would hate it if the parents covered up for this kid. I hope the kid never sees the light of day again. I also hope that if the DA is pulling a political stunt and shenanigan's like the prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial did that THEY also never see the light of day.

I really hate how the news media covers these things. I wish they would stop making these shitbags famous.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Realk

What world do you live in that it makes sense to compare these two things AT ALL.

---

They are both criminal acts committed by a child. Both take place because the parents allowed the child to be in a situation where it was possible the child would commit the crime. If parents allow a child to be unsupervised in a store wearing pocketed clothing purchased for the child by the parents, then they should not be surprised when the child steals something.

If parents are to be held criminally liable for the sins of the child, then the prosecution's burden to establish the parents' guilt should, I'm sure you would agree, be higher for a serious crime, like murder, than for a routine crime, like shoplifting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sighisoara

They would likely have a problem expelling him on the spot as that can only be done for disciplinary reasons and I’m guessing none of those things rose to the level of an expulsion/suspension. Public school student handbooks usually always specify the rules and punishments for violations. What I would expect is they assign the kid to online only lessons and send his ass home with a laptop if he doesn’t already have access to one.

---

Kids have gotten suspended or expelled for much less. Like making a finger gun with your hand, eating a Pop Tart to where what’s left is kind of shaped like a gun a little bit, etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Just what law do you think exists in Michigan do you think exists that allows a school official to expel a child "on gut instinct". We've got the right and the left persecuting law enforcement for enforcing mask and vaccine mandates, we've got the left marching whenever a teenager is forcibly detained when they're committing felony assault, then we've got 17 year olds showing up to active riots with assault rifles thinking they're going to be patriots. And getting away with it.

School officials are required to save the world with miniscule funding, highly restrictive laws, no tolerance for discipline from parents who could use the same or worse and a populace on both sides ready to overreact to everything.

No, this little fucker was allowed easy access to a gun of not outright given it altogether. His parents completely delegated all responsibility to his school and mommy dearest shows all the signs through her text of knowing he intended on doing it on the first place.

No, absolutely no, those parents being hauled into jail while additional charges are pending is ABSOLUTELY the right thing to do. We've had yet another mass shooting in a country with a country with way too many firearms and way too little self discipline.

The principle should be hailed as a hero for doing everything they could within the law. That this happened minutes after the parents were summoned and abandoned their armed son in school shows just how right their instincts were.

---

An AR-15 isn’t an assault rifle, since it has no automatic fire function. But thanks for showcasing your ignorance again, retard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

If the gun was in a locked safe, but the kid has the combination.. that's not locking up the gun.

---

What if the kid used the same combination from his dad’s luggage and it worked?

https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video_th...xYW4AI8w4O.jpg


I like how Seran quietly fucked off from the “terrorism” charge after it had to be spelled out for him. :lol:


But just in case I’m wrong about that…hey Seran, can you tell us what the shooter’s religious and/or political motivation was?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

An AR-15 isn’t an assault rifle, since it has no automatic fire function. But thanks for showcasing your ignorance again, retard.

---

Is it a dark color.. like black?

THEN IT IS!

Reported.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Is it a dark color.. like black?

THEN IT IS!

Reported.

---

That sounds pretty racist.

Reported to cwolff.