An "endeavor" to obstruct justice is what makes it a crime, even if there is no actual obstruction.
Printable View
No endeavor was made, he was wanting to fire Mueller because of perceived conflict of interest, which was conflict about a golf club membership. The "endeavor" (that never occurred) was about that. Not obstructing the investigation. Mueller would have been replaced.
Having read section 1503 on "endeavoring to obstruct justice" it still requires an action. No action left that office. It is more on attempting to destroy evidence, but failing to, or trying to coerce someone into lying under Oath, but they still tell the truth. It is broad, but it still requires action.
:lol:Under United States law an investigation doesn't even have to be taking place for prosecutable obstruction to occur. This necessarily means that affecting an investigation is irrelevant.What's more plausible for a June attempt to fire Mueller, a golf club membership that he knew about since the inception of the investigation in May, or the reports in June that Mueller was specifically investigating the President?Quote:
Except that nothing that Trump did involving this supposed order had any effect on Mueller or the investigation in anyway.
Mueller's replaceability is irrelevant, just as Cox's was in 1973.Quote:
The "endeavor" (that never occurred) was about that. Not obstructing the investigation. Mueller would have been replaced.