http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/misc/ronmeat.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Printable View
http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/misc/ronmeat.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Sorry, I meant how do they eat steak when they decide to eat steak the wrong way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Attachment 9278Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Not sure how this is going to come out...
https://media.giphy.com/media/l2JJzA...xP2g/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbTXqrS9l5E
Not bias, you guys. Not even a tiny bit.
I can see both sides of this argument.. and if Twitter is banning people who target individuals for harassment.. I’m fine with that. But Joe is right.. it’s an ideological rule that they are using to ban people, not a biological or scientific rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
That's the thing. They are essentially agreeing with one side of the argument and saying if you engage in the other side of the argument then you can be banned for it, and using the excuse that they are just "protecting" people from the meanie heads. Strangely enough these one sided rules always tend to be against Conservatives.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I responded to a post from Tlaib with "Motherfucker" on twitter and got banned for one post. I deleted twitter after that, problem solved.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray