Russia Investigation Heating Up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Duh...that's why it needs to up its investigation game. Can't you read?

Also, it's PK - don't take any number he gives as facts.

---

That's the thing about politically-motivated bias; if your standard setting is already 100, there's no "up" left to go when there's an actual reason. Hillary probably would've faced real consequences regarding her server use if the GOP hadn't wasted all their political capital with the public hysterically investigating her over something she had nothing to do with occurring (Benghazi).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

That's the thing about politically-motivated bias; if your standard setting is already 100, there's no "up" left to go when there's an actual reason. Hillary probably would've faced real consequences regarding her server use if the GOP hadn't wasted all their political capital with the public hysterically investigating her over something she had nothing to do with occurring (Benghazi).

---

Both sides have politically-motivated biases.

The left has gone absolutely insane because they thought 2016 was going to be an easy win. Literally nobody on the left thought Trump would win at all. It was suppose to be a landslide victory.

Now you have all sorts of investigations because the left doesn't know what else to do. Just wait until 2019 when the House takes over. Then the number will be 928932832 and PK will post another chart showing it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Both sides have politically-motivated biases.

The left has gone absolutely insane because they thought 2016 was going to be an easy win. Literally nobody on the left thought Trump would win at all. It was suppose to be a landslide victory.

Now you have all sorts of investigations because the left doesn't know what else to do. Just wait until 2019 when the House takes over. Then the number will be 928932832 and PK will post another chart showing it.

---

Your stance requires that you be ignorant of the fact that the Special Counsel is a Republican ... who was appointed by a Republican.. that Trump nominated. Republicans control both houses of Congress. "The left" doesn't have the ability to do anything until they take control of the House at the beginning of 2019.

Would you care to try again, this time not with profound ignorance?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

No, it isn't splitting hairs, it's apples and oranges. Your ignorance of the subject is not a surprise though.

---

Just more NOU from Androidpk. Honest question, do you know ANYTHING, or do you just repeat what you hear from MSNBC/CNN and just say NOU when you have no idea how to respond?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Your stance requires that you be ignorant of the fact that the Special Counsel is a Republican ... who was appointed by a Republican.. that Trump nominated. Republicans control both houses of Congress. "The left" doesn't have the ability to do anything until they take control of the House at the beginning of 2019.

Would you care to try again, this time not with profound ignorance?

---

You assume the Republican party is united. It's not.

Geez, go watch House of Cards or something. It's like you have no idea what politics is like at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

You assume the Republican party is united. It's not.

Geez, go watch House of Cards or something. It's like you have no idea what politics is like at all.

---

That doesn't address anything that I said. You claimed the investigations are the result of "the left, which doesn't know what else to do." There is no element of the Republican party that's part of "the left," and the investigations into Trump's criminality have been started by Republicans who were appointed by Trump himself. I repeat: Your stance is based on your profound ignorance, or you had a brainfart. Which is it?

I can't tell what's more sad; watching Androidpk act like he knows what he's talking about or watching Ashliana act like he knows what he's talking about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

I can't tell what's more sad; watching Androidpk act like he knows what he's talking about or watching Ashliana act like he knows what he's talking about.

---

The fact that you merely stated "Ashliana's acting like what he knows what he's talking about" without actually trying to claim what I'm wrong about says it all. Republicans in the Trump age have completely ceded the pretense of making arguments, instead relying on precious fee-fees. Better luck scrounging up an argument next time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

The fact that you merely stated "Ashliana's acting like what he knows what he's talking about" without actually trying to claim what I'm wrong about says it all. Republicans in the Trump age have completely ceded the pretense of making arguments, instead relying on precious fee-fees. Better luck scrounging up an argument next time.

---

Why would I bother? Last time I proved my claims for you you literally just responded with a video of "The Price is Right" losing sound effect. And now here you are claiming I do exactly what you did. It's like you and Androidpk are in a "NOU!" contest. I'm here to say you might as well just stop, Androidpk is actually pretty good at his "NOU!" game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Why would I bother? Last time I proved my claims for you you literally just responded with a video of "The Price is Right" losing sound effect. And now here you are claiming I do exactly what you did. It's like you and Androidpk are in a "NOU!" contest. I'm here to say you might as well just stop, Androidpk is actually pretty good at his "NOU!" game.

---

Oh, you were serious when you stupidly posted a person's profile, as if that somehow demonstrates your contention? :rofl:

You made a claim. You couldn't back it up. You made a claim today. You couldn't back it up. It's a consistent theme with you, as what you say is based on your fantasies and your feelings. Better luck next time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

You are STILL SO UPSET!!!

You've literally spent 10 years on this message board being so upset.. because of red reputation comments.

Time well spent by me.

Thank you for entertaining me.

Hey, do us all a favor and tell us again how you don't care about red rep again.... for the 10000000000th time.... all the while hoping someone is somehow hitting on you.

Sad!



So, collusion has already been established for over a year now.. yet Trump is still our President.

You're so fucking retarded.

---

You’re a scumbag

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

That doesn't address anything that I said. You claimed the investigations are the result of "the left, which doesn't know what else to do." There is no element of the Republican party that's part of "the left," and the investigations into Trump's criminality have been started by Republicans who were appointed by Trump himself. I repeat: Your stance is based on your profound ignorance, or you had a brainfart. Which is it?

---

Yes it does but I’m not surprised considering you keep having another argument with PB that literally goes around in circles because of your lack of reading comprehension. I don’t expect any breakthrough here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SHAFT

You’re a scumbag

---

I don’t think you use ignore at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Collusion's already been established... more than a year ago. Have you been hysterically cowering away from the news? Or is your memory shot?

---

Link showing this please. Not an opinion piece.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Yes it does but I’m not surprised considering you keep having another argument with PB that literally goes around in circles because of your lack of reading comprehension. I don’t expect any breakthrough here.

---

Okay. By all means, point out the issues with my reading comprehension in my discussion with PB. Unlike you, I can point to several of PB's. In fact, in my last response to him, I laid one out. There's a pattern here among the Parkbandit Defense Force. It's called "not backing up your assertions." Let's see how you do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Collusion's already been established... more than a year ago.

---

Link showing this please. Not an opinion piece.

---

Trump's son admitted to eagerly colluding with Russia, on Twitter, in a desperate attempt to get ahead of the New York Times story that was about to break reporting that fact. Whether Trump and his clan "colluded" isn't in question. It's a matter of the degree to which they conspired that's being investigated.

Another example -- after flatly denying dozens, if not hundreds of times, that they had any ongoing business interests or deals in Russia -- Cohen admitted in his guilty plea that he, on Trump's behalf, lied repeatedly, to the press, to Congress, specifically at Trump's direction. He's going to prison for it. He's only one of 5 Trump campaign members who's now a convicted felon.

Similarly, a few days ago in another court filing, the Special Counsel confirmed in court they have direct evidence that Manafort breached his plea agreement by lying about his ongoing contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known to U.S. sources as an intelligence asset for Russia, and for lying about ongoing contact with the Trump administration. SCO's court filing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Just more NOU from Androidpk. Honest question, do you know ANYTHING, or do you just repeat what you hear from MSNBC/CNN and just say NOU when you have no idea how to respond?

---

Troll and cry all you want, Trump and his goons are going down and no amount of temper tantrums from some loser on the PC is going to stop it from happening.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Troll and cry all you want, Trump and his goons are going down and no amount of temper tantrums from some loser on the PC is going to stop it from happening.

---

k

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Troll and cry all you want, Trump and his goons are going down and no amount of temper tantrums from some loser on the PC is going to stop it from happening.

---

Lol quoted for when trump gets re elected after this witch hunt is over.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Okay. By all means, point out the issues with my reading comprehension in my discussion with PB. Unlike you, I can point to several of PB's. In fact, in my last response to him, I laid one out. There's a pattern here among the Parkbandit Defense Force. It's called "not backing up your assertions." Let's see how you do.



Trump's son admitted to eagerly colluding with Russia, on Twitter, in a desperate attempt to get ahead of the New York Times story that was about to break reporting that fact. Whether Trump and his clan "colluded" isn't in question. It's a matter of the degree to which they conspired that's being investigated.

Another example -- after flatly denying dozens, if not hundreds of times, that they had any ongoing business interests or deals in Russia -- Cohen admitted in his guilty plea that he, on Trump's behalf, lied repeatedly, to the press, to Congress, specifically at Trump's direction. He's going to prison for it. He's only one of 5 Trump campaign members who's now a convicted felon.

Similarly, a few days ago in another court filing, the Special Counsel confirmed in court they have direct evidence that Manafort breached his plea agreement by lying about his ongoing contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known to U.S. sources as an intelligence asset for Russia, and for lying about ongoing contact with the Trump administration. SCO's court filing.

---

Tr;dr

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Okay. By all means, point out the issues with my reading comprehension in my discussion with PB. Unlike you, I can point to several of PB's. In fact, in my last response to him, I laid one out. There's a pattern here among the Parkbandit Defense Force. It's called "not backing up your assertions." Let's see how you do.

---

https://youtu.be/0u8teXR8VE4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koars Light

You libs do realize the statute of limitations for all of this is 5 years. If Trump wins his 2nd term, it’s over, Trumps in the clear of anything Mueller dishes out.

---

Given that DoJ guidelines state a sitting POTUS can't be indicted statute of limitations could be tolled until he is out of office. Plus he's not winning in 2020 so... Maybe you can write letters to him whi!e he's in prison.

Looks like Maria Butina and the Feds have reached a plea deal agreement and will potentially be filing it this week. :popcorn:


https://i.imgur.com/0y2VvlA.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

I'm afraid pointing out your ten-year obsession -- as a 50 year old -- with sending other men furious, sexualized messages full of your trademarked impotent rage doesn't constitute other people being upset by your obsession. People weren't angry with you as a result of that thread. They felt sorry for you, that you'd been on this earth for 65+ years and had somehow escaped the psychiatric care you so clearly need.

The comments you chose to obsessively send to other men anonymously on the Internet may have been of a sexual nature, but that doesn't mean anybody's claimed you were "hitting on them." Your reading comprehension is off-the-charts poor, so nobody's surprised you made that error.

---

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.

Quote:

---

Five of the president's campaign members are now convicted felons for repeated lying to the Special Counsel regarding Russia. Trump's been exposed as conspiring with Russia in exchange for a Trump Tower deal, after flatly denying all deals with Russia.. hundreds of times.. over the course of multiple years. Specifically, duping people like you eager to accept and reguritate anything he says. Even Fox News is expecting the president to be indicted as you sit here claiming "HURR All's well in Trumpland!"

---

How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.

Quote:

---

:rofl: You sound pretty upset. No surprise there, though - you've embarrassed yourself how many times now?

---

Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all. Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SHAFT

You’re a scumbag

---

Hilarious, coming from you.

I'm surprised you even used the correct "you're" though.. so I'm going to give you a big golf clap for getting it right! Sure, it was likely a lucky guess.. but hey, you did it!

https://media.giphy.com/media/1pofg0cTz5mak/source.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.

---

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.

---

Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

---

Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all.

---

The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

---

Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Snip

---

This is important.

How do you like your steak?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

---

Says the gay guy/girl/it with Trump Derangement Syndrome. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.



Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.



Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.



The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.



Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

---

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time:

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.



How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.



Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all. Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time

---

You being too retarded to read or understand a reply reflects only on you. Since you repeated yourself, enjoy the same. Thanks for conceding. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.

---

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.

---

Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

---

Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all.

---

The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

---

Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You being too retarded to read or understand a reply reflects only on you. Since you repeated yourself, enjoy the same. Thanks for conceding. :)



Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.



Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.



Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.



The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.



Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

---

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time:

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.



How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.



Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all. Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

This is important.

How do you like your steak?

---

I'm guessing probably in tube form...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time

---

You being too retarded to read or understand a reply reflects only on you. Since you repeated yourself, enjoy the same. Thanks for conceding. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.

---

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.

---

Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

---

Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all.

---

The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

---

Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

This is important.

How do you like your steak?

---

I'm guessing probably in tube form...

---

Nobody's surprised that's where your mind went. It fits in perfectly with the 10-plus year long obsession with other men you've had up until now, after all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You being too retarded to read or understand a reply reflects only on you. Since you repeated yourself, enjoy the same. Thanks for conceding. :)



Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.



Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.



Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.



The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.



Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.



Nobody's surprised that's where your mind went. It fits in perfectly with the 10-plus year long obsession with other men you've had up until now, after all.

---

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time:

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.



How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.



Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all. Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

Also, before you inevitably have to respond... here's my response:


I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time:

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.



How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.



Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all. Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time

---

You being too retarded to read or understand a reply reflects only on you. Since you repeated yourself, enjoy the same. Thanks for conceding. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.

---

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.

---

Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

---

Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all.

---

The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

---

Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

And for good measure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

I've already spent way too much time replying and since you are basically just saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again... I'm just going to copy paste my last response to you.

So, please re-read this again, since you didn't understand it the first time

---

You being too retarded to read or understand a reply reflects only on you. Since you repeated yourself, enjoy the same. Thanks for conceding. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

We get it! You're a flaming queer and red rep comments make you upset!

You don't have to tell us over and over and over and over again how upset you are! We can literally taste the tears everytime you pound out your copy/paste "OMG IT'S NOT FAIR I'M A FLAMING FAGGOT!"

No one cares. Well, except you obviously.. which makes it even more pathetic.

---

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

How many have to do with the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to beat the pantsuit off your girl?

Spoiler: ZERO.

---

Your tendency to cower away from developments reflects only on you. The real answer is "at least one." Paul Manafort, who the Special Counsel just confirmed in a court filing that they have direct evidence that Manafort violated his plea agreement by lying about and staying in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, known asset of Russian intelligence, and lying about and staying in contact with the Trump administration. In Parkbandit's twisted version of reality -- not at all based on real life -- all is well in Trump world. Everywhere else, Trump is screwed, and even Fox News is expecting him to be indicted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Project much? Nothing has been more embarrassing than your history here.

---

Noting how you've been obviously upset in the last few posts isn't "projection," my spectacularly deluded friend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

You think me calling you a fag is embarrassing to me? Not at all.

---

The fact that you continue to incorrectly claim that your 10-year obsessive spree of sending other men furious, sexualized messages is simply you "calling someone a fag" -- establishes your embarrassment. You wouldn't be constantly lying and trying to obfuscate your actions if you weren't. Much to your obvious dismay, the history of your mental illness is a matter of public record that you can't do anything, whatsoever, to change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Protip: Maybe stop acting like a butthurt little faggot in every post you make here? Are you even capable of such a feat? I doubt it.

---

Pro-tip: Denying you're being buzzhurt when you're oozing butthurt doesn't change anything. Your declarations don't have the power to unilaterally rewrite the universe to suit your delusions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Looks like Maria Butina and the Feds have reached a plea deal agreement and will potentially be filing it this week. :popcorn:

---

Yup, judge confirmed it's a plea deal. Hearing is set for Wednesday. Won't know until then if she's cooperating or just pleading guilty to get a reduced sentence. Given her situation with her lawyers recently I'm guessing the former.

Maria Butina, a 30-year-old Russian gun rights activist who stands accused developing a covert influence operation in the United States, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and cooperate with federal, state and local authorities in any ongoing investigations.

She admits, as part of the deal, according to a copy obtained by ABC News that is expected to be filed to the court, that she and an unnamed “U.S. Person 1,” which sources have identified as longtime Republican operative Paul Erickson, with whom she had a multiyear romantic relationship, “agreed and conspired, with a Russian government official (“Russian Official”) and at least one other person, for Butina to act in the United States under the direction of Russian Official without prior notification to the Attorney General.”

Based on the description, the “Russian Official” appears to be Alexander Torshin, deputy governor of the Russian Central Bank and a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Under his direction, the agreement said, she “sought to establish unofficial lines of communication with Americans having power and influence over U.S. politics.”

:popcorn:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Maria Butina, a 30-year-old Russian gun rights activist who stands accused developing a covert influence operation in the United States, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and cooperate with federal, state and local authorities in any ongoing investigations.

She admits, as part of the deal, according to a copy obtained by ABC News that is expected to be filed to the court, that she and an unnamed “U.S. Person 1,” which sources have identified as longtime Republican operative Paul Erickson, with whom she had a multiyear romantic relationship, “agreed and conspired, with a Russian government official (“Russian Official”) and at least one other person, for Butina to act in the United States under the direction of Russian Official without prior notification to the Attorney General.”

Based on the description, the “Russian Official” appears to be Alexander Torshin, deputy governor of the Russian Central Bank and a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Under his direction, the agreement said, she “sought to establish unofficial lines of communication with Americans having power and influence over U.S. politics.”

:popcorn:

---

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG! THIS IS FINALLY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Blah blah blah 92782732728239 words...

Whether or not you're upset is irrelevant (though you obviously are) - it's that you're mentally ill. You badly need psychiatric care.

Blah blah blah 2827262873297392732 more words

---

Wow, how long did it take you to type up that post? You're literally spending all this time arguing with an anonymous forum member and you are the one saying he needs psychiatric care...

It's obvious you're beyond triggered by him. Get some help.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Wow, how long did it take you to type up that post? You're literally spending all this time arguing with an anonymous forum member and you are the one saying he needs psychiatric care...

It's obvious you're beyond triggered by him. Get some help.

---

Ooh! A recycled snipe from the Parkbandit Defense Force! Very impressive. And to answer your question, not long at all. You're talking to Gemstone players, most of whom type pretty quickly. You wouldn't be a Trump apologist if you were quick on the uptake, though, so no surprise there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Ooh! A recycled snipe from the Parkbandit Defense Force! Very impressive. And to answer your question, not long at all. You're talking to Gemstone players, most of whom type pretty quickly. You wouldn't be a Trump apologist if you were quick on the uptake, though, so no surprise there.

---

It takes more to respond and format the way you are doing it. Dude, dudette (whatever you want to be called) - you be really really triggered. Just admit it.

Edit: And LOL @ your explanation of typing fast because of GS. LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

It takes more to respond and format the way you are doing it. Dude, dudette (whatever you want to be called) - you be really really triggered. Just admit it.

---

Your speed .. isn't my speed .. which isn't Joe Schmo's speed. Putting PB in his place in-between Hearthstone turns is fun.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Edit: And LOL @ your explanation of typing fast because of GS. LOL

---

It's funny because you can't think critically? ... Hilarious.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Your speed .. isn't my speed .. which isn't Joe Schmo's speed. Putting PB in his place in-between Hearthstone turns is fun.



It's funny because you can't think critically? ... Hilarious.

---

https://youtu.be/0u8teXR8VE4

PS: Stop hitting on me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

PS: Stop hitting on me.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGBhQbmPwH8

Sorry, Trump apologists can't date in DC. You're radioactive. Nobody's hitting on you, ever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You're radioactive.

---

Dude, stop hitting on me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Dude, stop hitting on me.

---

People don't hit on incels, sorry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

People don't hit on incels, sorry.

---

You are sick sir man she. I am NOT someone that likes to be abused this way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

You are sick sir man she. I am NOT someone that likes to be abused this way.

---

Don't worry. Someone might settle for you someday.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Don't worry. Someone might settle for you someday.

---

Keep telling yourself that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Don't worry. Someone might settle for you someday.

---

Stahp harassing me.

Reported.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

This is important.

How do you like your steak?

---

Medium burnt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

Medium burnt.

---

Communist.

Quote:

---

Asked if he had any concerns that Trump was implicated, Hatch told CNN: "The Democrats will do anything to hurt this President." Informed it was alleged by federal prosecutors in New York, Hatch said: "OK, but I don't care.”

---

AKA This is all a vast left wing conspiracy but even if it's true I still don't care.

When Trump won the election in 2016 I anticipated 2 specific things happening. The GOP would keep Trump in check and the Democrats would fix their internal problems and come out a stronger party. What I was not anticipating is the GOP bending the knee to Trump and refuse to hold him accountable for anything, including blatantly breaking the law. Their craven fixation on power over rule of law is going to be a stain on the party that they might not ever be able to recover from.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

AKA This is all a vast left wing conspiracy but even if it's true I still don't care.

When Trump won the election in 2016 I anticipated 2 specific things happening. The GOP would keep Trump in check and the Democrats would fix their internal problems and come out a stronger party. What I was not anticipating is the GOP bending the knee to Trump and refuse to hold him accountable for anything, including blatantly breaking the law. Their craven fixation on power over rule of law is going to be a stain on the party that they might not ever be able to recover from.

---

god you're stupid

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

AKA This is all a vast left wing conspiracy but even if it's true I still don't care.

When Trump won the election in 2016 I anticipated 2 specific things happening. The GOP would keep Trump in check and the Democrats would fix their internal problems and come out a stronger party. What I was not anticipating is the GOP bending the knee to Trump and refuse to hold him accountable for anything, including blatantly breaking the law. Their craven fixation on power over rule of law is going to be a stain on the party that they might not ever be able to recover from.

---

So.. you were wrong on both of these political predictions.

I’m shocked. Really. I mean, when you heroically called democrats winning the House in the midterms, I thought that finally, your complete losing streak would finally be over.

But loser has to lose...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

So.. you were wrong on both of these political predictions.

I’m shocked. Really. I mean, when you heroically called democrats winning the House in the midterms, I thought that finally, your complete losing streak would finally be over.

But loser has to lose...

---

Wrong as usual, PB. Democrat registration and participation has skyrocketed and the 2018 midterm victories were the largest in almost 50 years. The DNC stripped superdelegates of their powers and other issues were fixed within the party. They're looking far better than they did in 2016. But hey, you be you and deny reality all you want.

America is majority democrat with 12 million more registered democrats than republicans.

Plus Hillary won the popular vote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RichardCranium

Plus Hillary won the popular vote.

---

Imagine if we still operated how we did at the beginning of the US where the person that came in second was the VP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

America is majority democrat with 12 million more registered democrats than republicans.

---

Fortunately, most of those retards congregate in the same places, making those numbers irrelevant nationally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Wrong as usual, PB. Democrat registration and participation has skyrocketed and the 2018 midterm victories were the largest in almost 50 years. The DNC stripped superdelegates of their powers and other issues were fixed within the party. They're looking far better than they did in 2016. But hey, you be you and deny reality all you want.

---

Wut?

Super delegates are the least of the problems in the Democrat party. Only some Bernie fan would think that is a major problem...

Your only platform goal is ZOMG RESIST TRUMP!
You've alienated the middle class
You keep running old Party has beens because it's "their" time..

No, seriously.. everything is perfect with your new party Androidpk... enjoy.

Birds of a feather and all that..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wrathbringer

Fortunately, most of those retards congregate in the same places, making those numbers irrelevant nationally.

---

You can stick your head in the sand and claim that it is irrelevant according to some antiquated rules made by people in a new settlement over 200 years ago but it is very relevant when you consider the pulse of America in contemporary times.

Antiquated rules allow republicans to retain any power at this point. The last two Republican presidents both lost the popular vote. Republicans are out numbered by democrats pure and simple. If we went to one person, one vote, what currently poses as the republican party would be irrelevant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

You can stick your head in the sand and claim that it is irrelevant according to some antiquated rules made by people in a new settlement over 200 years ago but it is very relevant when you consider the pulse of America in contemporary times.

Antiquated rules allow republicans to retain any power at this point. The last two Republican presidents both lost the popular vote. Republicans are out numbered by democrats pure and simple. If we went to one person, one vote, what currently poses as the republican party would be irrelevant.

---

Thankfully we aren't going to regress and go back in antiquity to experience mob rule.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Wut?

Super delegates are the least of the problems in the Democrat party. Only some Bernie fan would think that is a major problem...

Your only platform goal is ZOMG RESIST TRUMP!
You've alienated the middle class
You keep running old Party has beens because it's "their" time..

No, seriously.. everything is perfect with your new party Androidpk... enjoy.

Birds of a feather and all that..

---

Superdelegates were a big issue for lots of Democrats. Continue showing how little you know about politics though, this is amusing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Superdelegates were a big issue for lots of Democrats. Continue showing how little you know about politics though, this is amusing.

---

Yes, we know Democrats tried to fix the election. Thank god for the electoral college.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

You can stick your head in the sand and claim that it is irrelevant according to some antiquated rules made by people in a new settlement over 200 years ago but it is very relevant when you consider the pulse of America in contemporary times.

Antiquated rules allow republicans to retain any power at this point. The last two Republican presidents both lost the popular vote. Republicans are out numbered by democrats pure and simple. If we went to one person, one vote, what currently poses as the republican party would be irrelevant.

---

You just illustrated the benefits of the electoral college while attempting to argue against it. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wrathbringer

You just illustrated the benefits of the electoral college while attempting to argue against it. :lol:

---

Look at you having a grown up conversation! Your momma would be proud that you could put together a sentence longer than "you're retarded".

Times have changed since the days of slavery and suffrage old man. Do you agree with the democratic principle of majority rule?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

You can stick your head in the sand and claim that it is irrelevant according to some antiquated rules made by people in a new settlement over 200 years ago but it is very relevant when you consider the pulse of America in contemporary times.

Antiquated rules allow republicans to retain any power at this point. The last two Republican presidents both lost the popular vote. Republicans are out numbered by democrats pure and simple. If we went to one person, one vote, what currently poses as the republican party would be irrelevant.

---

Please attend a 4th grade civics course.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Look at you having a grown up conversation! Your momma would be proud that you could put together a sentence longer than "you're retarded".

Times have changed since the days of slavery and suffrage old man. Do you agree with the democratic principle of majority rule?

---

Do you believe that a majority should be able to crush the minority? Do you feel that urbanites should dictate law to rural farmers with little if any say from said farmers?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Superdelegates were a big issue for lots of Democrats. Continue showing how little you know about politics though, this is amusing.

---

Androidpk(2018): The major problem with the Democrat Party is how Super delegates controlled the nomination process.

You're right man! Dems have solved all the problems they've had! They will never lose another election now!

Good job!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Androidpk(2018): The major problem with the Democrat Party is how Super delegates controlled the nomination process.

You're right man! Dems have solved all the problems they've had! They will never lose another election now!

Good job!

---

Funny thing, Hillary had about 350ish more regular delegates than Bernie Sanders did. If Super Delegates didn't exist, she still beat him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Funny thing, Hillary had about 350ish more regular delegates than Bernie Sanders did. If Super Delegates didn't exist, she still beat him.

---

SHUT UP YOUR MOUTH! BERNIE WOULD HAVE WON!

Honestly, I'm not sure what 2018Androidpk "thinks" about it. He's probably fine with it now, since he was so against it in 2016.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Do you believe that a majority should be able to crush the minority? Do you feel that urbanites should dictate law to rural farmers with little if any say from said farmers?

---

Your first question is a little overly dramatic. Yes to your second question. Sorry, I have nothing against farmers, but I'm not interested in holding back the entire nation just because a few people are scared of progress.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

SHUT UP YOUR MOUTH! BERNIE WOULD HAVE WON!

Honestly, I'm not sure what 2018Androidpk "thinks" about it. He's probably fine with it now, since he was so against it in 2016.

---

I've heard people say the delegates only voted that way because of the super delegates, but I think I remember the majority of the super delegates holding off until it was clear the delegates were in majority in favor of Hillary. Either way, I think it is funny that people get pissy at the super delegates. Bernie has been a politician since 1981, and then for 2 years he was a Democrat, he switched back to being an independent again after 2016. He basically just popped in and said "I'm gonna go ahead and take over leadership of this party, thx."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Your first question is a little overly dramatic. Yes to your second question. Sorry, I have nothing against farmers, but I'm not interested in holding back the entire nation just because a few people are scared of progress.

---

Yeah, fuck the rights and voices of the people who grow all our food!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Please attend a 4th grade civics course.

---

Please join the rest of the human race.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SHAFT

Please join the rest of the human race.

---

https://j.gifs.com/KOG0zn.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Your first question is a little overly dramatic. Yes to your second question. Sorry, I have nothing against farmers, but I'm not interested in holding back the entire nation just because a few people are scared of progress.

---

Your idea of "progress" is hilarious.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

I'm not interested in holding back the entire nation just because a few people are scared of progress.

---

Comments like this is why the left is retarded. The electoral college is all about protecting state rights. Elections are decided by the states.

"Progressives" want to change this to election by mob rule.

I hope you have a horrible Christmas Back!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Look at you having a grown up conversation! Your momma would be proud that you could put together a sentence longer than "you're retarded".

Times have changed since the days of slavery and suffrage old man. Do you agree with the democratic principle of majority rule?

---

No.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wrathbringer

No, you fucking retard.

---

Fix't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wrathbringer

No.

---

So you don't believe in democracy. If I remember you also don't believe in paying taxes. Yet you talk non stop shit to people who do while enjoying the safety of living in this country?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

So you don't believe in democracy. If I remember you also don't believe in paying taxes. Yet you talk non stop shit to people who do while enjoying the safety of living in this country?

---

Have another wine cooler, back. And watch a three minute youtube video on civics so that you can speak on this subject much more intelligently than you are now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

You can stick your head in the sand and claim that it is irrelevant according to some antiquated rules made by people in a new settlement over 200 years ago but it is very relevant when you consider the pulse of America in contemporary times.

Antiquated rules allow republicans to retain any power at this point. The last two Republican presidents both lost the popular vote. Republicans are out numbered by democrats pure and simple. If we went to one person, one vote, what currently poses as the republican party would be irrelevant.

---

"Democrats don't win by the current rules! We must change the rules so Democrats can win more!"

Spoken like a true loser.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wrathbringer

Have another wine cooler, back. And watch a three minute youtube video on civics so that you can speak on this subject much more intelligently than you are now.

---

If we're dispensing advice to each other, mine is for you to fuck right the fuck off.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

If we're dispensing advice to each other, mine is for you to fuck right the fuck off.

---

Someone's triggered.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Someone's triggered.

---

If being triggered means being tired of listening to some fool talk shit non stop with no grounds to back it up and then telling them to take that shit elsewhere, then yeah, guilty. :LOL:

Back you've convinced me, one person one vote is the way to go. Since states can choose how they assign their electoral votes I say we start with the largest state and demand they split up their electoral votes based on the popular vote. We won't rest until California makes this change to show the rest of the country how it's done! Are you with me, Back!?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

If being triggered means being tired of listening to some fool talk shit non stop with no grounds to back it up and then telling them to take that shit elsewhere, then yeah, guilty. :LOL:

---

LOLOLOL YOU'RE SO FUNNY!!!

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0Hly2...VILm/giphy.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

If being triggered means being tired of listening to some fool talk shit non stop with no grounds to back it up and then telling them to take that shit elsewhere, then yeah, guilty. :LOL:

---

https://i.imgur.com/A1cU4iI.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Androidpk(2018): The major problem with the Democrat Party is how Super delegates controlled the nomination process.

You're right man! Dems have solved all the problems they've had! They will never lose another election now!

Good job!

---

No one but you said it was a major problem. The point was it was an issue and the DNC addressed it, unlike the RNC which has acted like a beta cuck towards Trump. Good job holding Individual 1 accountable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Fix't.

---

Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

I've heard people say the delegates only voted that way because of the super delegates, but I think I remember the majority of the super delegates holding off until it was clear the delegates were in majority in favor of Hillary. Either way, I think it is funny that people get pissy at the super delegates. Bernie has been a politician since 1981, and then for 2 years he was a Democrat, he switched back to being an independent again after 2016. He basically just popped in and said "I'm gonna go ahead and take over leadership of this party, thx."

---

You don't know what you are talking about. Bernie is an outside and he's really going to shake up Washington!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

No one but you said it was a major problem. The point was it was an issue and the DNC addressed it, unlike the RNC which has acted like a beta cuck towards Trump. Good job holding Individual 1 accountable.

---

YOU are the one that brought it up as an example of how the DNC has changed so dramatically since 2016 that they are now a stronger party. Only a Bernie Fanboi would believe that is the top thing that required a major change.

And Trump has given me everything I ever wanted out of my one vote and more. I never thought, in my wildest imagination, that it would bring this much entertainment to me.

Thank you for leading the pack during this meltdown. It's been hilarious to watch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

YOU are the one that brought it up as an example of how the DNC has changed so dramatically since 2016 that they are now a stronger party. Only a Bernie Fanboi would believe that is the top thing that required a major change.

And Trump has given me everything I ever wanted out of my one vote and more. I never thought, in my wildest imagination, that it would bring this much entertainment to me.

Thank you for leading the pack during this meltdown. It's been hilarious to watch.

---

Individual 1

Individual 1's consigliere gets his prison sentence at 11 today.

Russian spy Maria Butina and her GOP operative boyfriend are telling the FBI how they helped setup a very private line if communication between Russian government officials and Individual 1 and how the NRA was used to funnel tens of millions of dollars to Individual 1's campaign. Is it legal to get campaign funding from a foreign government? Asking for a friend..

Cohen's sentence hearing is ongoing now and Assistant US Attorney Nicholas Roos is talking about how these campaign finance crimes carried a tremendous social cost.

"In committing these crimes, Mr. Cohen ((and by extension the Individual 1 who ordered them*)) has eroded faith in the electoral process and compromised the rule of law."

*I'm adding this part

Judge William Pauley walked through each of the counts against Cohen, saying "each of these crimes is a serious offense against the United States."

"Mr. Cohen pled guilty to a veritable smorgasbord of fraudulent conduct." he said.

Individual 1's twitter responses are going to be lit :popcorn:

Sentence is in, 3 years in prison for Individual 1's former consigliere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koars Light

36 months, for paying a couple of whores from lying. This is the best the Liberals can come up with? Really?

https://media.tenor.com/images/cdbdb...f523/tenor.gif

---

One of the whores is actually paying him now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koars Light

36 months, for paying a couple of whores from lying. This is the best the Liberals can come up with? Really?

https://media.tenor.com/images/cdbdb...f523/tenor.gif

---

3 years in prison for breaking federal laws. And no, not liberals, Republicans. And this is just getting started. Individual 1's turn will be coming up soon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

Let me spell this out for you in terms you'll understand:

Bob Mueller is a Federal Prosecutor in the DoJ who is investigating a sitting US President. There is one rule above all others that any Federal Prosecutor in his position must abide by: You do NOT under any circumstances make public statements or filings that in any way, shape, or form would lead the public to suspect the current sitting US President of having broken the law unless you are 100% certain that they did. And Mueller is the DoJ's most ardent boy scout- he follows the rules to the letter. (particularily in this situation)

Add to that the fact that this investigation involves the most serious allegations any modern US President has faced, and it's even more true than usual. The damage that unnecessary doubt and suspicion would do to the office of the President, the President's ability to effectively lead the country, and the sense of stability this country relies on to keep going is immeasurable.

Mueller has been progressively painting the picture of what happened in the 2016 election very carefully and deliberately. And his most recent filings have been connecting all of the dots in ways that clearly indicate that all roads lead to the President. Every word in these filings is precise and strategic. And both Trump and Trump's campaign were mentioned repeatedly in the filings in lieu of less accusatory language like "US citizens" or "major political campaign".

I doubt any of you are going to bother reading these filings or the previous ones, but I suggest you start coming up with your cognitive dissonance strategies now so you can explain away how blind and deluded you have been for the past two years.

---

You’re stupid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

That too!

---

Like totes omg!!!

https://media1.tenor.com/images/1146...itemid=7712120

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

Let me spell this out for you in terms you'll understand:

Bob Mueller is a Federal Prosecutor in the DoJ who is investigating a sitting US President. There is one rule above all others that any Federal Prosecutor in his position must abide by: You do NOT under any circumstances make public statements or filings that in any way, shape, or form would lead the public to suspect the current sitting US President of having broken the law unless you are 100% certain that they did. And Mueller is the DoJ's most ardent boy scout- he follows the rules to the letter. (particularily in this situation)

Add to that the fact that this investigation involves the most serious allegations any modern US President has faced, and it's even more true than usual. The damage that unnecessary doubt and suspicion would do to the office of the President, the President's ability to effectively lead the country, and the sense of stability this country relies on to keep going is immeasurable.

Mueller has been progressively painting the picture of what happened in the 2016 election very carefully and deliberately. And his most recent filings have been connecting all of the dots in ways that clearly indicate that all roads lead to the President. Every word in these filings is precise and strategic. And both Trump and Trump's campaign were mentioned repeatedly in the filings in lieu of less accusatory language like "US citizens" or "major political campaign".

I doubt any of you are going to bother reading these filings or the previous ones, but I suggest you start coming up with your cognitive dissonance strategies now so you can explain away how blind and deluded you have been for the past two years.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

I couldn't help but laugh at this one. I'm not sure what "conversation" you think we had, but given that I've spent the last month or so transitioning to a new role at work- effectively working two jobs- I've barely been sleeping- let alone visiting PC. I've dropped in maybe once a week. So apparently you've been having a one sided conversation with yourself and giving yourself imaginary rhetorical points over it.

Which is...bleak to say the least. But also exactly what I would expect out of you.

---

Good god how much sand falls out of your pirahna-vagina on an average day?

Just admit for once that you were wrong and you rarely click past the first result on Google.

In b4 “I was obviously being sarcastic about the Aka, just like I was about Blizzard paying $5m per month for a WoW server!

Every time you disappear for a bit after making yourself look so stupid that even you noticed, it’s the same “I was super busy being the most important person where I work and have been working 25 hour shifts!” You’ve used this bs multiple times, and it’s always been right after you said stuff so stupid that even you had a brief split second moment of self awareness.

At least have some variation for your fictional excuses. Like you had to make a road trip to Indiana to pick up a super special dildo that wasn’t safe to be shipped via normal methods but you didn’t allow your Prius to go over 35 mph because environment so it took a while. No one would question that.

SDNY's press release today: "the tax laws apply to everybody."

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...red-trump.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

The only thing raising questions about your sexuality are your actions, buddy. Most men don't spend a decade of their lives -- starting in their 50's -- sending other men furious, sexualized imagery they spent untold hours of their lives cooking up. What drove you to do so is your own issue.



Collusion's already been established... more than a year ago. Have you been hysterically cowering away from the news? Or is your memory shot?

---

Just curious...are you a top or a bottom?

This tweet aged rather poorly.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuO2IQOW0AA61lz.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Good god how much sand falls out of your pirahna-vagina on an average day?

Just admit for once that you were wrong and you rarely click past the first result on Google.

In b4 “I was obviously being sarcastic about the Aka, just like I was about Blizzard paying $5m per month for a WoW server!

Every time you disappear for a bit after making yourself look so stupid that even you noticed, it’s the same “I was super busy being the most important person where I work and have been working 25 hour shifts!” You’ve used this bs multiple times, and it’s always been right after you said stuff so stupid that even you had a brief split second moment of self awareness.

At least have some variation for your fictional excuses. Like you had to make a road trip to Indiana to pick up a super special dildo that wasn’t safe to be shipped via normal methods but you didn’t allow your Prius to go over 35 mph because environment so it took a while. No one would question that.

---

You son of a bitch, I thought she came back again to gloat about how she was so above us after her trip to the moons of Saturn but you're just replying to a days-old post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koars Light

Called statute of limitations, he’s clear.

---

Baghdad Bob strikes again!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

This tweet aged rather poorly.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuO2IQOW0AA61lz.jpg

---

https://i.redd.it/2irllrf7uy221.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

That's the thing about politically-motivated bias; if your standard setting is already 100, there's no "up" left to go when there's an actual reason. Hillary probably would've faced real consequences regarding her server use if the GOP hadn't wasted all their political capital with the public hysterically investigating her over something she had nothing to do with occurring (Benghazi).

---

Did she have anything to do with all of those idiots telling us it was over a YouTube video? Which you and time4pk probably still believe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Troll and cry all you want, Trump and his goons are going down and no amount of temper tantrums from some loser on the PC is going to stop it from happening.

---

Quoted for when you scrub this later on and pretend you never said it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Given that DoJ guidelines state a sitting POTUS can't be indicted statute of limitations could be tolled until he is out of office. Plus he's not winning in 2020 so... Maybe you can write letters to him whi!e he's in prison.

---

Quoted for when you scrub this the day after the 2020 election and pretend you never said it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Did she have anything to do with all of those idiots telling us it was over a YouTube video? Which you and time4pk probably still believe.

---

The CIA had conflicting intelligence regarding that.

Did you not read the results of the GOP-led investigation that they spent millions of dollars and two plus years on?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by House Intelligence Committee, led by Republicans

"There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence."

---

No? How embarrassing for you. Then again, the GOP's intent was never to actually inform voters or investigate legitimate concerns. It was to convince uncritical stooges who don't care about facts that "HURR HILLARY BAD."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

People don't hit on incels, sorry.

---

So that’s why you’re always so angry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

AKA This is all a vast left wing conspiracy but even if it's true I still don't care.

When Trump won the election in 2016 I anticipated 2 specific things happening. The GOP would keep Trump in check and the Democrats would fix their internal problems and come out a stronger party. What I was not anticipating is the GOP bending the knee to Trump and refuse to hold him accountable for anything, including blatantly breaking the law. Their craven fixation on power over rule of law is going to be a stain on the party that they might not ever be able to recover from.

---

You’re trying really really REALLY hard at this Great Value time4fun thing.

At least you’re trying at something for once.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

You can stick your head in the sand and claim that it is irrelevant according to some antiquated rules made by people in a new settlement over 200 years ago but it is very relevant when you consider the pulse of America in contemporary times.

Antiquated rules allow republicans to retain any power at this point. The last two Republican presidents both lost the popular vote. Republicans are out numbered by democrats pure and simple. If we went to one person, one vote, what currently poses as the republican party would be irrelevant.

---

Remember how you didn’t have a problem with the electoral college until Hillary lost?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Your first question is a little overly dramatic. Yes to your second question. Sorry, I have nothing against farmers, but I'm not interested in holding back the entire nation just because a few people are scared of progress.

---

Why did you remove “Resist white supremacy.” from your sig?

Look everybody, Back is a white supremacist!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

3 years in prison for breaking federal laws. And no, not liberals, Republicans. And this is just getting started. Individual 1's turn will be coming up soon.

---

You, NPC 1, are retarded.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taernath

You son of a bitch, I thought she came back again to gloat about how she was so above us after her trip to the moons of Saturn but you're just replying to a days-old post.

---

I’m on vacation this week, and I do most of my PC’ing from work.

And/or when I’m taking a dump. I’m just now getting caught up.

I can’t feel my legs. Send help.

https://pics.me.me/standing-up-after...s-16102460.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

The CIA had conflicting intelligence regarding that.

Did you not read the results of the GOP-led investigation that they spent millions of dollars and two plus years on?



No? How embarrassing for you. Then again, the GOP's intent was never to actually inform voters or investigate legitimate concerns. It was to convince uncritical stooges who don't care about facts that "HURR HILLARY BAD."

---

So you do believe it was over a YouTube video.

This could very well earn you a #1 contender spot.

Is cwolff still the champ? Or did time4fun take it back yet?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

So you do believe it was over a YouTube video.

This could very well earn you a #1 contender spot.

Is cwolff still the champ? Or did time4fun take it back yet?

---

You desperately need to work on your reading comprehension.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

So you do believe it was over a YouTube video.

This could very well earn you a #1 contender spot.

Is cwolff still the champ? Or did time4fun take it back yet?

---

Championships can't change hand without an official ruling and I don't remember voting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You desperately need to work on your reading comprehension.

---

You tap danced around the YouTube part, and you know what that means...

But anyway...do you believe Hillary when she said Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

You tap danced around the YouTube part, and you know what that means...

But anyway...do you believe Hillary when she said Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video?

---

You do realize that doubling down on willful ignorance isn't an argument, right? Hillary's statements were based on conflicting intelligence the CIA had. She repeated the CIA's official opinion at the time. So did Susan Rice.

Your failure or unwillingness to read (or inability to comprehend) the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee's report on Benghazi, that they wasted millions of dollars and multiple years on, reflects only on you.

https://i.imgur.com/zaCJXRl.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You do realize that doubling down on willful ignorance isn't an argument, right? Hillary's statements were based on conflicting intelligence the CIA had. She repeated the CIA's official opinion at the time. So did Susan Rice.

Your failure or unwillingness to read (or inability to comprehend) the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee's report on Benghazi, that they wasted millions of dollars and multiple years on, reflects only on you.

---

https://media.giphy.com/media/L8XuphFGqlSfe/giphy.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

https://media.giphy.com/media/L8XuphFGqlSfe/giphy.gif

---

"My willful ignorance being pointed out is hilarious!"

Thanks for playing, Methais. Perhaps next time you should pick a topic you know anything about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

"My willful ignorance being pointed out is hilarious!"

Thanks for playing, Methais. Perhaps next time you should pick a topic you know anything about.

---

Which part of those “conflicting reports” said that a YouTube video caused it to happen?

Also, I’d like to apologize real quick, as I keep forgetting people like you don’t understand memes and gifs and other things involving humor, but the gladiator pic is laughing at you. Because you’re stupid. And delusional.

But anyway, tell me more about the CIA reports blaming Benghazi on a YouTube video and how that’s why Hillary was telling us it was purely over outrage about a YouTube video instead of linking a 37 page wall of text that you didn’t read.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

"My willful ignorance being pointed out is hilarious!"

Thanks for playing, Methais. Perhaps next time you should pick a topic you know anything about.

---

I heard ur gay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Which part of those “conflicting reports” said that a YouTube video caused it to happen?

---

Uhh, the part where that was the CIA's original stance, which Clinton relied on. Doubling down over and over again on you not having read anything on the topic.... doesn't actually constitute an argument. Are you asking to be simultaneously educated on the topic and have your nonsensical non-points debunked?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Also, I’d like to apologize real quick, as I keep forgetting people like you don’t understand memes and gifs and other things involving humor, but the gladiator pic is laughing at you. Because you’re stupid. And delusional.

---

Regardless of what you intended, the only thing that deserves laughter is you being too spectacularly retarded to understand that your stance has been undercut even by Republican hacks who were forced to clear her of any supposed wrongdoing -- that reflects only on you. Your willful ignorance doesn't constitute an argument.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

But anyway, tell me more about the CIA reports blaming Benghazi on a YouTube video and how that’s why Hillary was telling us it was purely over outrage about a YouTube video instead of linking a 37 page wall of text that you didn’t read.

---

If you'd read it, you wouldn't be sitting here saying "tell me more about what's in the report."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

3 years in prison for breaking federal laws. And no, not liberals, Republicans. And this is just getting started. Individual 1's turn will be coming up soon.

---

How do you think this will impact any collusion case against President Trump. Be specific..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Is cwolff still the champ? Or did time4fun take it back yet?

---

Cwolff was stripped of his title when he lost the will to defend it. time4fun was named champion and is currently looking for a challenger. The current rankings are:

1) Ashliana - It’s really stepped up in cwolff’s absence. Has decent stamina, but uses the same tired combinations over and over and over again.. which is easy to defend again. It’s main strength is it’s ability to bore the shit out of anyone until they just give up and walk away.

2) Androidpk (2018) - Another one that has stepped up his game as of late. He’a very difficult to coach because he’s lazy, but he’s crafty and when the ref’s back is turned, he has no morals and nothing is off limits. Usually has to borrow stuff to get into the ring, but he’s not above hair pulling and biting as long as he isn’t caught.

3) Shaft - His meltdown has been fun to watch over the last 2 years, but his major weakness is inconsistency. Strong at times, then he’s nonexistent. If he wants to be champion, he needs to stay engaged.

4) Backlash - The People’s Champion has returned! Strong showing on Drunk Tuesday, but he just needs quantity. As the past champion, he knows what it takes to win and if he puts forth some effort, can easily leap over the other contenders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

uses the same tired combinations over and over and over again.

---

When you claim the same retarded things, Parkbandit, and can't back up anything you say, the same relevant responses apply. Want some fresh responses? Try coming up with some fresh points. Playing pretend that your claims weren't debunked doesn't last forever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Cwolff was stripped of his title when he lost the will to defend it. time4fun was named champion and is currently looking for a challenger. The current rankings are:

1) Ashliana - It’s really stepped up in cwolff’s absence. Has decent stamina, but uses the same tired combinations over and over and over again.. which is easy to defend again. It’s main strength is it’s ability to bore the shit out of anyone until they just give up and walk away.

2) Androidpk (2018) - Another one that has stepped up his game as of late. He’a very difficult to coach because he’s lazy, but he’s crafty and when the ref’s back is turned, he has no morals and nothing is off limits. Usually has to borrow stuff to get into the ring, but he’s not above hair pulling and biting as long as he isn’t caught.

3) Shaft - His meltdown has been fun to watch over the last 2 years, but his major weakness is inconsistency. Strong at times, then he’s nonexistent. If he wants to be champion, he needs to stay engaged.

4) Backlash - The People’s Champion has returned! Strong showing on Drunk Tuesday, but he just needs quantity. As the past champion, he knows what it takes to win and if he puts forth some effort, can easily leap over the other contenders.

---

:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Cwolff was stripped of his title when he lost the will to defend it. time4fun was named champion and is currently looking for a challenger. The current rankings are:

1) Ashliana - It’s really stepped up in cwolff’s absence. Has decent stamina, but uses the same tired combinations over and over and over again.. which is easy to defend again. It’s main strength is it’s ability to bore the shit out of anyone until they just give up and walk away.

2) Androidpk (2018) - Another one that has stepped up his game as of late. He’a very difficult to coach because he’s lazy, but he’s crafty and when the ref’s back is turned, he has no morals and nothing is off limits. Usually has to borrow stuff to get into the ring, but he’s not above hair pulling and biting as long as he isn’t caught.

3) Shaft - His meltdown has been fun to watch over the last 2 years, but his major weakness is inconsistency. Strong at times, then he’s nonexistent. If he wants to be champion, he needs to stay engaged.

4) Backlash - The People’s Champion has returned! Strong showing on Drunk Tuesday, but he just needs quantity. As the past champion, he knows what it takes to win and if he puts forth some effort, can easily leap over the other contenders.

---

https://youtu.be/RFlCD5CYAcU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

How do you think this will impact any collusion case against President Trump. Be specific..

---

It establishes precedence that Individual 1 is a criminal.

I'm glad Cohen got the book thrown at him. What kind of lawyer pleads guilty to crimes without any sort of agreement in place for a reduced sentence?

If the best "witness" they have against Trump so far is a convict currently serving time in prison for lying I think Trump is in good shape.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

I think Trump is in good shape.

---

Fox's top legal analyst disagrees with you:

"We've learned that federal prosecutors here in New York City -- not Bob Mueller and his team in Washington DC -- career prosecutors in New York City -- have evidence that the President of the United States committed a felony, by ordering and paying Michael Cohen to break the law. How do we know that? They told that to a federal judge. Under the rules, they can't tell that to a federal judge unless they actually have that hardcore evidence. Under the rules, they can't tell that to a federal judge unless they intend to DO something with that evidence." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55sqoOfBmZA&t=3m38s

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

I think Trump is in good shape.

---

Here's Tgo trying to outdo Koars Light for Bagdad Bob impersonation of the year award. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Fox's top legal analyst disagrees with you:

"We've learned that federal prosecutors here in New York City -- not Bob Mueller and his team in Washington DC -- career prosecutors in New York City -- have evidence that the President of the United States committed a felony, by ordering and paying Michael Cohen to break the law. How do we know that? They told that to a federal judge. Under the rules, they can't tell that to a federal judge unless they actually have that hardcore evidence. Under the rules, they can't tell that to a federal judge unless they intend to DO something with that evidence." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55sqoOfBmZA&t=3m38s

---

What so called evidence is this, other than Cohen's lying testimony?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

It establishes precedence that Individual 1 is a criminal.

---

Does it though? Wouldn't Trump hire a lawyer to make sure he doesn't break the law?

Cohen is a self serving scumbag who used his position as Trump's lawyer to make money.

3 years isn't enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Does it though? Wouldn't Trump hire a lawyer to make sure he doesn't break the law?

Cohen is a self serving scumbag who used his position as Trump's lawyer to make money.

3 years isn't enough.

---

Riiiight, because Trump is so concerned with not breaking the laugh... :lol2:

The always real news at MSNBC just referred to Mike Pompeo as a "butt boy." Yes that's right, on national TV Mika Brzezinski used a homophobic slur on MSNBC. Let's now all watch as the always outraged far left either doesn't care, pretends it never happened, or even calls for her to get a raise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Just curious...are you a top or a bottom?

---

https://youtu.be/GECfMTueVpU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Just curious...are you a top or a bottom?

---

https://youtu.be/GECfMTueVpU

---

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...deeyechloe.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...deeyechloe.jpg

---

Your best post ever.

https://i.imgur.com/VjTEjpbl.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/zfhrGROl.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/YMujsu0l.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koars Light

Dude’s not wrong. All of that is a legit defense.

---

I wonder who composed it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RichardCranium

I wonder who composed it.

---

His lawyer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

His lawyer.

---

Yeah but which one? Not Rudy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RichardCranium

Yeah but which one? Not Rudy.

---

Lawyer McLawyerstein

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trump's butt boy

The always real news at MSNBC just referred to Mike Pompeo as a "butt boy." Yes that's right, on national TV Mika Brzezinski used a homophobic slur on MSNBC. Let's now all watch as the always outraged far left either doesn't care, pretends it never happened, or even calls for her to get a raise.

---

ok

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Does it though? Wouldn't INDIVIDUAL 1 hire a lawyer to make sure he doesn't break the law?

Cohen is a self serving scumbag who used his position as INDIVIDUAL 1'S lawyer to make money.

3 years isn't enough.

---

Fixed for ya.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

The always real news at MSNBC just referred to Mike Pompeo as a "butt boy." Yes that's right, on national TV Mika Brzezinski used a homophobic slur on MSNBC. Let's now all watch as the always outraged far left either doesn't care, pretends it never happened, or even calls for her to get a raise.

---

Deflector shields, up!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

The always real news at MSNBC just referred to Mike Pompeo as a "butt boy." Yes that's right, on national TV Mika Brzezinski used a homophobic slur on MSNBC. Let's now all watch as the always outraged far left either doesn't care, pretends it never happened, or even calls for her to get a raise.

---

Oh my god! That's awful! As the arbiter of all things LGBT, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I now hate MSNBC. How could I have been so blind, ignoring this joke, compared to conservative sources giving uncritical platforms to far-right zealots for decades?

Thank you for showing me the light -- it's not the right to blame, despite having campaigned tirelessly against equal rights and having donated untold millions of dollars fighting them, but the left, who campaigned tirelessly for equal rights and donated untold millions for them.

The term "butt boy" is incredibly hurtful -- evoking decades, if not centuries, of painful memories where that term has been used to denigrate queer Americans.

Mika should be tarred and feathered. Pilloried, even.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Oh my god! That's awful! As the arbiter of all things LGBT, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I now hate MSNBC. How could I have been so blind, ignoring this joke, compared to conservative sources giving uncritical platforms to far-right zealots for decades?

Thank you for showing me the light -- it's not the right to blame, despite having campaigned tirelessly against equal rights and having donated untold millions of dollars fighting them, but the left, who campaigned tirelessly for equal rights and donated untold millions for them.

The term "butt boy" is incredibly hurtful -- evoking decades, if not centuries, of painful memories where that term has been used to denigrate queer Americans.

Mika should be tarred and feathered. Pilloried, even.

---

You're leaving an awful lot of letters of the LGBT there. Hater.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

The term "butt boy" is incredibly hurtful -- evoking decades, if not centuries, of painful memories where that term has been used to denigrate queer Americans.

---

So you condemn the term. Please have a moment to observe and then condemn the individual who used the same language to denigrate the person you disagree with.

https://i.imgur.com/C781p3b.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

So you condemn the term. Please have a moment to observe and then condemn the individual who used the same language to denigrate the person you disagree with.

https://i.imgur.com/C781p3b.png

---

Wut

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Wut

---

Butt boy is a harmful term, according to Ashlianna. You posted the little edit there, I made sure to snag the date and time, calling Tgo a butt boy. An inexcusable term that harms people. Ashlianna was willing to address Tgo. I'm asking if she's willing to address you on the same grounds.

I thought it was pretty straightforward.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Butt boy is a harmful term, according to Ashlianna. You posted the little edit there, I made sure to snag the date and time, calling Tgo a butt boy. An inexcusable term that harms people. Ashlianna was willing to address Tgo. I'm asking if she's willing to address you on the same grounds.

I thought it was pretty straightforward.

---

I see Ashliana's blatant sarcasm went flying over your head :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Uhh, the part where that was the CIA's original stance, which Clinton relied on. Doubling down over and over again on you not having read anything on the topic.... doesn't actually constitute an argument. Are you asking to be simultaneously educated on the topic and have your nonsensical non-points debunked?

Regardless of what you intended, the only thing that deserves laughter is you being too spectacularly retarded to understand that your stance has been undercut even by Republican hacks who were forced to clear her of any supposed wrongdoing -- that reflects only on you. Your willful ignorance doesn't constitute an argument.



If you'd read it, you wouldn't be sitting here saying "tell me more about what's in the report."

---

You didn’t read it either. You just linked some 37 page wall of text all like “here you go here’s proof!” knowing that nobody is going to waste time reading all that bs.

But since you seem to be claiming you have read it, feel free to shut me down by quoting the relevant part(s) that blame Benghazi on a Youtube video and directing me to which page(s) it’s found on.

Should only take you seconds, since you should already know precisely where it says that and all. Right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Cwolff was stripped of his title when he lost the will to defend it. time4fun was named champion and is currently looking for a challenger. The current rankings are:

1) Ashliana - It’s really stepped up in cwolff’s absence. Has decent stamina, but uses the same tired combinations over and over and over again.. which is easy to defend again. It’s main strength is it’s ability to bore the shit out of anyone until they just give up and walk away.

2) Androidpk (2018) - Another one that has stepped up his game as of late. He’a very difficult to coach because he’s lazy, but he’s crafty and when the ref’s back is turned, he has no morals and nothing is off limits. Usually has to borrow stuff to get into the ring, but he’s not above hair pulling and biting as long as he isn’t caught.

3) Shaft - His meltdown has been fun to watch over the last 2 years, but his major weakness is inconsistency. Strong at times, then he’s nonexistent. If he wants to be champion, he needs to stay engaged.

4) Backlash - The People’s Champion has returned! Strong showing on Drunk Tuesday, but he just needs quantity. As the past champion, he knows what it takes to win and if he puts forth some effort, can easily leap over the other contenders.

---

:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RichardCranium

I wonder who composed it.

---

Kranar

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RichardCranium

Yeah but which one? Not Rudy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Lawyer McLawyerstein

---

It’s GSLawyer you nubs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Oh my god! That's awful! As the arbiter of all things LGBT, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I now hate MSNBC. How could I have been so blind, ignoring this joke, compared to conservative sources giving uncritical platforms to far-right zealots for decades?

Thank you for showing me the light -- it's not the right to blame, despite having campaigned tirelessly against equal rights and having donated untold millions of dollars fighting them, but the left, who campaigned tirelessly for equal rights and donated untold millions for them.

The term "butt boy" is incredibly hurtful -- evoking decades, if not centuries, of painful memories where that term has been used to denigrate queer Americans.

Mika should be tarred and feathered. Pilloried, even.

---

https://media1.tenor.com/images/723e...itemid=6197334

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun’s butt boy

ok

---

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

:lol:

---

SHAFT

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SHAFT

SHAFT

---

Now THIS is the type of stupidity you need to climb up in the ranks!

Stay engaged.

Stay triggered.

Continue the meltdown.

I'm in your corner.

:thumbup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

You didn’t read it either.

---

I did read it, when it was originally released. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

You just linked some 37 page wall of text all like “here you go here’s proof!” knowing that nobody is going to waste time reading all that bs.

---

The report's fundamental conclusions are very short, and reflect what I said.. considering I directly quoted it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

But since you seem to be claiming you have read it, feel free to shut me down by quoting the relevant part(s) that blame Benghazi on a Youtube video and directing me to which page(s) it’s found on.

Should only take you seconds, since you should already know precisely where it says that and all. Right?

---

I already did. You've demonstrated, repeatedly, that you couldn't read (or comprehend) two short sentences.

Your refusal to read anything about the incident you apparently found so outrageous.... doesn't constitute an argument on your part. You're doubling down on something you know next to nothing about, then going "SEE? I don't know anything about it! I'm fairly certain I should be outraged, because some Republican told me to be! No, not the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee who wasted millions of dollars to produce a report that CLEARED the administration! The ones that know as little as I do!"

Spectacularly convincing, Methais.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Oh my god! That's awful! As the arbiter of all things LGBT, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I now hate MSNBC. How could I have been so blind, ignoring this joke, compared to conservative sources giving uncritical platforms to far-right zealots for decades?

Thank you for showing me the light -- it's not the right to blame, despite having campaigned tirelessly against equal rights and having donated untold millions of dollars fighting them, but the left, who campaigned tirelessly for equal rights and donated untold millions for them.

The term "butt boy" is incredibly hurtful -- evoking decades, if not centuries, of painful memories where that term has been used to denigrate queer Americans.

Mika should be tarred and feathered. Pilloried, even.

---

Take it easy, Butt Boy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

I see Ashliana's blatant sarcasm went flying over your head :lol:

---

So it's only sarcasm when it's got negative connotations toward one side but not the other? Oh man, that sounds like a problematic double standard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

So it's only sarcasm when it's got negative connotations toward one side but not the other? Oh man, that sounds like a problematic double standard.

---

Why don't you ask Ashliana yourself if it was sarcasm or not, since you seem to be having so much trouble.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Why don't you ask Ashliana yourself if it was sarcasm or not, since you seem to be having so much trouble.

---

I wasn't asking you but you presumed to know. Then when you lacked something solid you deflected to try and minimize the idea that I'd caught you being a stupid dick.

Maybe next time, don't answer for other people with your own interpretations. It'll make posts like this, typically needing to be unspoken, less mandatory for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

I wasn't asking you but you presumed to know. Then when you lacked something solid you deflected to try and minimize the idea that I'd caught you being a stupid dick.

Maybe next time, don't answer for other people with your own interpretations. It'll make posts like this, typically needing to be unspoken, less mandatory for you.

---

I presumed it was sarcasm? Seriously? Go reread Ashliana's comment. It's dripping with sarcasm. Stop being such a fucking retarded butt boy. :lol:

But seriously, why do all the MAGA troll bots have such shitty reading comprehension?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

I presumed it was sarcasm? Seriously? Go reread Ashliana's comment. It's dripping with sarcasm. Stop being such a fucking retarded butt boy. :lol:

---

So when are we not being literal? Because it feels like if we're going to be assuming that Ashliana is qualified enough to dictate what is and is not hate speech, he'd be taken literally on every instance regarding it.

But we're not, are we? Because you have no conviction and shitty morals yet decry each and every time that your behavior changes because of a handful of people you disagree with personally about politics.

Quote:

---

But seriously, why do all the MAGA troll bots have such shitty reading comprehension?

---

Almost like it was your sole driving purpose really, at times, to deliberately bait those people you swear are stalking you. Or harassing you. Or making you change your posting behavior and patterns because of their trolling nature.

Oh. You must have so many wrinkles in that fucking walnut brain of yours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Let's now all watch as the always outraged far left either doesn't care, pretends it never happened, or even calls for her to get a raise.

---

I never get tired of being right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Now THIS is the type of stupidity you need to climb up in the ranks!

Stay engaged.

Stay triggered.

Continue the meltdown.

I'm in your corner.

:thumbup:

---

You're confused.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

I never get tired of being right.

---

Virtuous lot, aren't they? Completely willing to hold the brand of what is and is not "hate speech"... until someone from their own side says it then suddenly it's 'just a joke'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

So when are we not being literal? Because it feels like if we're going to be assuming that Ashliana is qualified enough to dictate what is and is not hate speech, she'd be taken literally on every instance regarding it.

---

Ashliana is a he. I'm sure he enjoys you calling him a she though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Ashliana is a he. I'm sure he enjoys you calling him a she though.

---

Fix't. Otherwise it's a hate crime.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Virtuous lot, aren't they? Completely willing to hold the brand of what is and is not "hate speech"... until someone from their own side says it then suddenly it's 'just a joke'.

---

Butt boy is now hate speech? You're a special kind of stupid aren't you? Maybe you should go back to not taking any drugs, eh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Butt boy is now hate speech? You're a special kind of stupid aren't you? Maybe you should go back to not taking any drugs, eh?

---

Since 2005, it has been recognized that the following is deragotory language to gay men:

Quote:

---

"Butt pirate, butt boy, butt rider, butt pilot, or butt rustler"

---

Oh, but please keep going. It's getting kind of funny again. You. You are kind of funny again. Because I'm fucking laughing at how thick you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Since 2005, it has been recognized that the following is deragotory language to gay men:

Oh, but please keep going. It's getting kind of funny again. You. You are kind of funny again. Because I'm fucking laughing at how thick you are.

---

Yeah, because you really care if it's derogatory right? That's why you didn't give a fuck that parkbandit keeps calling ashliana a flaming queer or a faggot. Get the fuck out of here with your faux outrage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Yeah, because you really care if it's derogatory right? That's why you didn't give a fuck that parkbandit keeps calling ashliana a flaming queer or a faggot. Get the fuck out of here with your faux outrage.

---

Because if you're going to pretend to be stalked, harassed, and bullied it helps to define a clear line that the person is crossing. Especially when that person or side you're in support of is, by no unclear definition of the word, crossing a line you have. Why the free pass, you dumb fuck?

I'll clarify that none of that shit offends me. Just like faggot or queer doesn't offend Ashlianna, when it's directed at them by PB. Something they've said numerous times. So when it comes to PB calling them one, I know that Ashlianna can, by their own admittance, fucking take it.

I'll be glad to break it down further but it's obvious I'll need to use fucking sock puppets with you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

I'll be glad to break it down further but it's obvious I'll need to use fucking sock puppets with you.

---

stop fucking sock puppets you disgusting bitch

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

stop fucking sock puppets you disgusting bitch

---

The sock Dobi got in Harry Potter was a crunchy one. He was set free by a sex sock. You think on that, you bigot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

The sock Dobi got in Harry Potter was a crunchy one. He was set free by a sex sock. You think on that, you bigot.

---

I have no idea wtf you just said you fucking weeb.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Because if you're going to pretend to be stalked, harassed, and bullied it helps to define a clear line that the person is crossing. Especially when that person or side you're in support of is, by no unclear definition of the word, crossing a line you have. Why the free pass, you dumb fuck?

I'll clarify that none of that shit offends me. Just like faggot or queer doesn't offend Ashlianna, when it's directed at them by PB. Something they've said numerous times. So when it comes to PB calling them one, I know that Ashlianna can, by their own admittance, fucking take it.

I'll be glad to break it down further but it's obvious I'll need to use fucking sock puppets with you.

---

Look at all the fucks I give, astray, look at them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Look at all the fucks I give, astray, look at them.

---

The wrinkliest brain for its size. I'd say use your balls for reference but you forgot them in someone's purse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Yeah, because you really care if it's derogatory right? That's why you didn't give a fuck that parkbandit keeps calling ashliana a flaming queer or a faggot. Get the fuck out of here with your faux outrage.

---

Yeah but see I'm not someone who gives a shit what kind of language someone uses, that's what far left cretins such as yourself do. Well, it's what you do when people on the right use such language, if someone on the left does it you call them a hero.

Weird how that works.

So 164 nations in the UN agreed to a resolution that would make migration a "human right" and that illegal immigrants should be entitled to social services in the country they illegally moved to. I wonder how many rich Middle Eastern countries are going to follow this resolution? Or is it more like they expect Europe and US and Canada to take in illegal aliens?

Oh! My bad, the resolution also states it's a hate crime to refer to illegal aliens as illegal aliens, you should refer to them as "irregular migrants."

Amy Schumer hates that women supposedly have to look "super fuckable" in order to get recognition for their talents so she's going to do the opposite from now on.

Okay, maybe I missed it, but when did Amy Schumer ever look "super fuckable"?

It sure as hell wasn't when she was wearing black leather:

https://d1o0agh0cxj49r.cloudfront.ne...1487878527.jpg

Tgo's nervous breakdown continues. I blame Individual 1.

Androidpk apparently thinks Amy Schumer does look "super fuckable."

Failure isn't always a cut and dry thing in comedy as it's constantly evolving. If your material is deemed unfunny by peers in the same field, some of whom have been around for a while and know the game, would it not benefit you to look back on that material with a critical eye?

How is she so fucking dense? Also, is this the right topic?

Lisa Lampenelli is a pretty big comic. If anyone thinks she is super fuckable....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Also, is this the right topic?

---

Yes, if Amy Schumer becomes super fuckable then it proves Russian collusion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Androidpk apparently thinks Amy Schumer does look "super fuckable."

---

Meanwhile Tgo would still rather be fucked by Trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Meanwhile Tgo would still rather be fucked by Trump.

---

Does time4fun know you're using homosexuality as an insult? You better scrub this post before she evicts you from her couch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Does time4fun know you're using homosexuality as an insult? You better scrub this post before she evicts you from her couch.

---

I'm not insulting you, just stating the obvious.