This is probably the best point anyone has made. If Latrin were President this would have never happened because universal surveillance.
Printable View
You and your comrades argument is "how big of a weapon is acceptable for an act of violence?" not what protected rights are being violated that lead to the acts of violence. Is throwing a rock at someone an acceptable form of response to speech you don't like? Or is a tank the line for which we say that's too extreme of a violent response?
Both sides are guilty of acts of violence. Both sides espouse ideology that is anti-freedom. This woman is not a hero or a victim, she was part of the problem.
We are useing motorized vehicles in our examples because that is quite literally what was used in the attack in Virginia.
I don't see an answer to my question, so I'll ask again - can I ram my tank through a public building, or does my unrestricted movement maybe have some restrictions on it after all?
Of course you can't, a public library is not public property designed for the movement of said tank. A public roadway is designed for just that purpose.
Is it OK to barricade your driveway because I don't like you?