Oh...:grr:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Printable View
Oh...:grr:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
In the meantime, you are guilty of doing that *all the time* cwolff.
No I'm not. Even this time I didn't do that. I asked the question "if they are real issues then why aren't they being raised" and Tg's interpretation of that was to assume I questioned whether he was even telling the truth personally. See read below.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanteax
ATL, you fall into the same trap as the others. You assume before you write and you assume that people are trying to trap you. Can't even converse with you because you'll reply "I'm not falling for your bullshit blah blah blah"Quote:
ut...you just questioned...if I was even telling the truth...about..those things...
"Others" being you?Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolff
lol ...Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolff
cwolff is like John Cleese's character in the argument clinic sketch.
In order to receive the help you need, you must first admit you have a problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolff
The key is that "Hispanics" isn't a voting bloc, and Presidential elections aren't based on the popular vote. Some Hispanics are more liberal, some are more conservative. President Bush received the majority of the Hispanic vote in 2000 Florida, because those Hispanics happen to be mostly Cubans who are more conservative, and he therefore won the election. The last two Presidential elections were annihilations so Florida wouldn't have mattered anyway, but we're still talking about 29 electoral votes that the Republicans are needlessly sacrificing. I'm sure there are other states with similar sub-demographics, just not as pronounced.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Methais wants to send black men to die needlessly. How am I not surprised.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's true, so think it through. Why are they manufacturing stories when they have perfectly good ways to attack Obama? What if it has less to do with cogent attacks and more to do with the content of the attacks themselves? Take drones. The Republican base is pro-drone, so they're probably not going to respond to attacks on that front, right? What if everything actually bad about Obama is conservative-leaning? (He is a centrist, logically he would represent values on both sides near to the middle.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
It could be ridiculous, but if it was, why would they have to invent attacks? It takes a lot of work to invent something untrue, I should know. Much easier to just parrot the truth.I'm not sure how you define recovery and I know better than to ask. For my own interest, if we measure how long it takes for real GDP to reach the previous peak, we get:Quote:
Originally Posted by Thondalar
Great Depression - 7 years
Post WW2 - 6 years
Mid 70s - 2 years
Great Recession - 3.5 years
So now Benghazi never happened?Quote:
Originally Posted by Latrinsorm
That's the correct takeaway, you got it Terry. A+ and a sticker.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01