I thought PB was the general...Quote:
Originally Posted by Warriorbird
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7UHICy8Etf...rangelove1.jpg
Printable View
I thought PB was the general...Quote:
Originally Posted by Warriorbird
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7UHICy8Etf...rangelove1.jpg
This looks like more good news.
https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hpho...83549008_n.jpg
I thought the ACA was supposed to save us money?Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolff
Attachment 6397Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
How is it jumping to 130 billion, from less than 20, good?
Because it's less than 160 billion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanteax
DUH!
Another shining example of cwolff not having a clue.
Actually, they always knew it would jump. Remember, a lot of the taxes were started back in 2011. Now we are getting into the part where it costs money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanteax
Remember tho when Obama said it wouldn't increase the deficit?
He meant to say that on April 1st of 2009.
Attachment 6397Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I thought you were some shit hot business man? Either you're just being critical because you like to troll or you don't understand what you're looking at. Which is it?Quote:
The health-care law's expansion of insurance coverage will cost $104 billion less than projected over the next decade, according to revised estimates from nonpartisan budget analysts Monday. Obamacare's lower-than-expected costs will come largely because premiums will be cheaper than previously thought.
Obamacare's coverage provisions in 2014 are expected to cost $5 billion less than the $41 billion the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation projected earlier in the year. The CBO now expects the federal government to spend about $164 billion less in the next decade on subsidies in Obamacare health insurance marketplaces. The CBO's expected costs of the Affordable Care Act's coverage provisions have declined since it was signed four years ago, as you can see in the below chart.
"It's going to cost less than we originally thought therefore it's saving us money!"
I also like how it specifically just mentions it will cost less in subsidies. Is that because more people are qualifying for Medicaid than they originally thought and the 164 billion they are "saving" in subsidies is going to be spent on Medicaid?