https://media4.giphy.com/media/l0MYz...mrXW/giphy.gif
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...d-for-Ashliana
Printable View
No thanks, Tardbandit. You guys will be called out on your ignorance whenever, and wherever, it's necessary. :)
Please try to contain your ongoing butthurt meltdown from Trump's epic loss to your special thread.
You're the SJW version of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuAvRCSWu8I
in b4 tired worn out copy & paste projection
Speaking of tired, worn out, copy and paste projection..
https://i.gifer.com/3OA0m.gif
Your own memes contradict this:
https://i.imgur.com/s18K2KL.png
Try again once you’ve acquired even a minimal amount of self awareness.
Hey, Methais. "Tangerines can't be orange! -- because oranges are orange!" doesn't make much sense, and similarly, an image that I made that was long doesn't mean right-wing attempts at memery, like yours, can't be long. :)
Better luck working through your difficulties with basic reasoning next time.
Remember the other day when you pulled out Ol' Reliable for my use of a video that exceeded your arbitrary length constituting the same? Hint: That video was less than half as long as the one you just posted. Seeing you commit a self-own, based on your own logic, and then twist yourself into pretzels to excuse it never gets old.
:rofl:
Interesting way of saying that best case you don't understand things like context, worst case you're making a total false equivalency. But you constantly "argue" in bad faith, so that's expected. I'm gonna go with you're just dense as fuck though, because you repeatedly demonstrate your inability to follow or understand anything.
Still waiting for those wall of text right wing memes you keep not producing though. What's the hold up?
Hurry the fuck up. Surely you're foaming at the mouth to score a "win" on a 30 year old text game forum, no?
https://media.tenor.com/images/a9342...df01/tenor.gif
Interesting way of saying "Someone could try to make this argument, but I think by implying that someone could, I somehow did. Even though I didn't."
See above. Not only are you, in reality, failing to lay out a case, you're either deluded enough to believe that you did, or cynical enough to believe that it wasn't immediately transparent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
And, as predicted, here come the logical pretzels. Except, as with last time and the evidentiary standards you set forth, you set the rule. To quote your retarded words: your post was "just the video version" of the wall of text.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
And as the realization slowly dawns over Methais understanding he undercut his own case:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://i.redd.it/pnxxngt3suq41.png